Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 340

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

IS QUASAR OPTICAL VARIABILITY A DAMPED RANDOM WALK?

Open access
Zu, Ying, Kochanek, C. S., Kozłowski, Szymon, Udalski, Andrzej·2013·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

The damped random walk (DRW) model is increasingly used to model the variability in quasar optical light curves, but it is still uncertain whether the DRW model provides an adequate description of quasar optical variability across all timescales. Using a sample of OGLE quasar light curves, we consider four modifications to the DRW model by introducing additional parameters into the covariance function to search for deviations from the DRW model on both short and long timescales. We find good agreement with the DRW model on timescales that are well sampled by the data (from a month to a few years), possibly with some intrinsic scatter in the additional parameters, but this conclusion depends on the statistical test employed and is sensitive to whether the estimates of the photometric errors are correct to within ∼10%. On very short timescales (below a few months), we see some evidence of the existence of a cutoff below which the correlation is stronger than the DRW model, echoing the recent finding of Mushotzky et al. using quasar light curves from Kepler . On very long timescales (>a few years), the light curves do not constrain models well, but are consistent with the DRW model.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0004-637x/765/2/106

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 23 references

Cited by

See all 340

Metadata

Authors
Zu, Y., Kochanek, C. S., Kozłowski, S., & Udalski, A.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2013-02-21
Volume
765
Issue
2
Pages
106
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W2082138926
Cited by
340
References
23
FWCI
12.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: IS QUASAR OPTICAL VARIABILITY A DAMPED RANDOM WALK? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0004-637x/765/2/106
The paper
Zu, Y., Kochanek, C. S., Kozłowski, S., & Udalski, A. (2013). IS QUASAR OPTICAL VARIABILITY A DAMPED RANDOM WALK? The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637x/765/2/106

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.