The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
CAN MINOR MERGING ACCOUNT FOR THE SIZE GROWTH OF QUIESCENT GALAXIES? NEW RESULTS FROM THE CANDELS SURVEY
Open accessAbstract
The presence of extremely compact galaxies at z ∼ 2 and their subsequent growth in physical size has been the cause of much puzzlement. We revisit the question using deep infrared Wide Field Camera 3 data to probe the rest-frame optical structure of 935 galaxies selected with 0.4 < z < 2.5 and stellar masses M * > 10 10.7 M ☉ in the UKIRT Ultra Deep Survey and GOODS-South fields of the CANDELS survey. At each redshift, the most compact sources are those with little or no star formation, and the mean size of these systems at fixed stellar mass grows by a factor of 3.5 ± 0.3 over this redshift interval. The data are sufficiently deep to identify companions to these hosts whose stellar masses are ten times smaller. By searching for these around 404 quiescent hosts within a physical annulus 10 h −1 kpc < R < 30 h −1 kpc, we estimate the minor merger rate over 0.4 < z < 2. We find that 13%–18% of quiescent hosts have likely physical companions with stellar mass ratios of 0.1 or greater. Mergers of these companions will typically increase the host mass by 6% ± 2% per merger timescale. We estimate the minimum growth rate necessary to explain the declining abundance of compact galaxies. Using a simple model motivated by recent numerical simulations, we then assess whether mergers of the faint companions with their hosts are sufficient to explain this minimal rate. We find that mergers may explain most of the size evolution observed at z ≲ 1 if a relatively short merger timescale is assumed, but the rapid growth seen at higher redshift likely requires additional physical processes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Schlegel, D. J., Finkbeiner, D. P., & Davis, M. (1998) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/305772 · Cited by 15,126
THE SEVENTH DATA RELEASE OF THE SLOAN DIGITAL SKY SURVEY
Abazajian, K. N., Adelman-McCarthy, J. K., Agüeros, M. A., Allam, S. S., Prieto, C. A., An, D., Anderson, K. S. J., Anderson, S. F., Annis, J., Bahcall, N. A., et al. (2009) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1088/0067-0049/182/2/543 · Cited by 5,341
Maraston, C. (2005) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09270.x · Cited by 1,907
THE MAJOR AND MINOR GALAXY MERGER RATES AT z < 1.5
Lotz, J. M., Jonsson, P., Cox, T. J., Croton, D., Primack, J. R., Somerville, R. S., & Stewart, K. (2011) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/742/2/103 · Cited by 450
Cited by
Theoretical Challenges in Galaxy Formation
Naab, T., & Ostriker, J. P. (2017) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081913-040019 · Cited by 722
MORPHOLOGIES OF ∼190,000 GALAXIES AT z = 0–10 REVEALED WITH HST LEGACY DATA. I. SIZE EVOLUTION
Shibuya, T., Ouchi, M., & Harikane, Y. (2015) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1088/0067-0049/219/2/15 · Cited by 426
Huang, S., Leauthaud, A., Greene, J. E., Bundy, K., Lin, Y.-T., Tanaka, M., Miyazaki, S., & Komiyama, Y. (2018) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stx3200 · Cited by 113
Self-citationNewman, A. B., Belli, S., Ellis, R. S., & Patel, S. G. (2018) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aacd4d · Cited by 60
Self-citationMassive Early-type Galaxies in the HSC-SSP: Flux Fraction of Tidal Features and Merger Rates
Huang 黄, Q. 齐., & Fan 范, L. 璐. (2022) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ac85b1 · Cited by 19
Metadata
- Authors
- Newman, A. B., Ellis, R. S., Bundy, K., & Treu, T.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2012-02-02
- Volume
- 746
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 162
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W1994134121
- Cited by
- 456
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 28.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: CAN MINOR MERGING ACCOUNT FOR THE SIZE GROWTH OF QUIESCENT GALAXIES? NEW RESULTS FROM THE CANDELS SURVEY. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0004-637x/746/2/162
- The paper
- Newman, A. B., Ellis, R. S., Bundy, K., & Treu, T. (2012). CAN MINOR MERGING ACCOUNT FOR THE SIZE GROWTH OF QUIESCENT GALAXIES? NEW RESULTS FROM THE CANDELS SURVEY. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637x/746/2/162
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.