Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 304

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 138 of the 138 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

WHAT TURNS GALAXIES OFF? THE DIFFERENT MORPHOLOGIES OF STAR-FORMING AND QUIESCENT GALAXIES SINCE z∼ 2 FROM CANDELS

Open access
Bell, Eric F., van der Wel, Arjen, Papovich, Casey, Kocevski, Dale, Lotz, Jennifer, McIntosh, Daniel H., Kartaltepe, Jeyhan, Faber, S. M., Ferguson, Harry, Koekemoer, Anton, Grogin, Norman, Wuyts, Stijn, Cheung, Edmond, Conselice, Christopher J., Dekel, Avishai, Dunlop, James S., Giavalisco, Mauro, Herrington, Jessica, Koo, David C., McGrath, Elizabeth J., de Mello, Duilia, Rix, Hans-Walter, Robaina, Aday R., Williams, Christina C.·2012·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

We use HST /WFC3 imaging from the CANDELS Multi-Cycle Treasury Survey, in conjunction with the Sloan Digital Sky Survey, to explore the evolution of galactic structure for galaxies with stellar masses >3 × 10 10 M ☉ from z = 2.2 to the present epoch, a time span of 10 Gyr. We explore the relationship between rest-frame optical color, stellar mass, star formation activity, and galaxy structure. We confirm the dramatic increase from z = 2.2 to the present day in the number density of non-star-forming galaxies above 3 × 10 10 M ☉ reported by others. We further find that the vast majority of these quiescent systems have concentrated light profiles, as parameterized by the Sérsic index, and the population of concentrated galaxies grows similarly rapidly. We examine the joint distribution of star formation activity, Sérsic index, stellar mass, inferred velocity dispersion, and stellar surface density. Quiescence correlates poorly with stellar mass at all z < 2.2. Quiescence correlates well with Sérsic index at all redshifts. Quiescence correlates well with "velocity dispersion" and stellar surface density at z > 1.3, and somewhat less well at lower redshifts. Yet, there is significant scatter between quiescence and galaxy structure: while the vast majority of quiescent galaxies have prominent bulges, many of them have significant disks, and a number of bulge-dominated galaxies have significant star formation. Noting the rarity of quiescent galaxies without prominent bulges, we argue that a prominent bulge (and perhaps, by association, a supermassive black hole) is an important condition for quenching star formation on galactic scales over the last 10 Gyr, in qualitative agreement with the active galactic nucleus feedback paradigm.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0004-637x/753/2/167

Cites

138 of 138 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 138 references

Cited by

See all 304

Metadata

Authors
Bell, E. F., van der Wel, A., Papovich, C., Kocevski, D., Lotz, J., McIntosh, D. H., Kartaltepe, J., Faber, S. M., Ferguson, H., Koekemoer, A., Grogin, N., Wuyts, S., Cheung, E., Conselice, C. J., Dekel, A., Dunlop, J. S., Giavalisco, M., Herrington, J., Koo, D. C., McGrath, E. J., de Mello, D., Rix, H.-W., Robaina, A. R., & Williams, C. C.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2012-06-26
Volume
753
Issue
2
Pages
167
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W2149653371
Cited by
304
References
138
FWCI
18.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: WHAT TURNS GALAXIES OFF? THE DIFFERENT MORPHOLOGIES OF STAR-FORMING AND QUIESCENT GALAXIES SINCE z∼ 2 FROM CANDELS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0004-637x/753/2/167
The paper
Bell, E. F., van der Wel, A., Papovich, C., Kocevski, D., Lotz, J., McIntosh, D. H., Kartaltepe, J., Faber, S. M., Ferguson, H., Koekemoer, A., Grogin, N., Wuyts, S., Cheung, E., Conselice, C. J., Dekel, A., Dunlop, J. S., Giavalisco, M., Herrington, J., Koo, D. C., . . . Williams, C. C. (2012). WHAT TURNS GALAXIES OFF? THE DIFFERENT MORPHOLOGIES OF STAR-FORMING AND QUIESCENT GALAXIES SINCE z∼ 2 FROM CANDELS. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637x/753/2/167

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.