Cited by 109Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaAstrophysical Phenomena and ObservationsStellar, planetary, and galactic studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

QUIESCENCE CORRELATES STRONGLY WITH DIRECTLY MEASURED BLACK HOLE MASS IN CENTRAL GALAXIES

Open access
Terrazas, Bryan A., Bell, Eric F., Henriques, Bruno M. B., White, Simon D. M., Cattaneo, Andrea, Woo, Joanna·2016·The Astrophysical Journal Letters

Abstract

Roughly half of all stars reside in galaxies without significant ongoing star formation. However, galaxy formation models indicate that it is energetically challenging to suppress the cooling of gas and the formation of stars in galaxies that lie at the centers of their dark matter halos. In this Letter, we show that the dependence of quiescence on black hole and stellar mass is a powerful discriminant between differing models for the mechanisms that suppress star formation. Using observations of 91 star-forming and quiescent central galaxies with directly measured black hole masses, we find that quiescent galaxies host more massive black holes than star-forming galaxies with similar stellar masses. This observational result is in qualitative agreement with models that assume that effective, more-or-less continuous active galactic nucleus feedback suppresses star formation, strongly suggesting the importance of the black hole in producing quiescence in central galaxies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3847/2041-8205/830/1/l12

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Moshir, 1990, BAAS, 22, 1325
  2. Sérsic, 1963, BAAA, 6, 41

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Terrazas, B. A., Bell, E. F., Henriques, B. M. B., White, S. D. M., Cattaneo, A., & Woo, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • ETH Zurich (CH)
  • Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics (DE)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal Letters
Published
2016-10-07
Volume
830
Issue
1
Pages
L12
ISSN
  • 2041-8205 (ISSN-L)
  • 2041-8213
OpenAlex
W2523991115
Cited by
103
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 1
FWCI
4.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Astrophysical Journal Letters (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1256260)
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  • California Institute of Technology
  • Jet Propulsion Laboratory
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Keywords
quiescent galaxies, black hole mass, stellar mass, central galaxies, star formation suppression, AGN feedback, galaxy evolution, dark matter halos

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review