The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
REPRODUCING THE STELLAR MASS/HALO MASS RELATION IN SIMULATED ΛCDM GALAXIES: THEORY VERSUS OBSERVATIONAL ESTIMATES
Open accessAbstract
We examine the present-day total stellar-to-halo mass (SHM) ratio as a function of halo mass for a new sample of simulated field galaxies using fully cosmological, ΛCDM, high-resolution SPH + N -body simulations. These simulations include an explicit treatment of metal line cooling, dust and self-shielding, H 2 -based star formation (SF), and supernova-driven gas outflows. The 18 simulated halos have masses ranging from a few times 10 8 to nearly 10 12 M ☉ . At z = 0, our simulated galaxies have a baryon content and morphology typical of field galaxies. Over a stellar mass range of 2.2 × 10 3 –4.5 × 10 10 M ☉ we find extremely good agreement between the SHM ratio in simulations and the present-day predictions from the statistical abundance matching technique presented in Moster et al. This improvement over past simulations is due to a number systematic factors, each decreasing the SHM ratios: (1) gas outflows that reduce the overall SF efficiency but allow for the formation of a cold gas component; (2) estimating the stellar masses of simulated galaxies using artificial observations and photometric techniques similar to those used in observations; and (3) accounting for a systematic, up to 30% overestimate in total halo masses in DM-only simulations, due to the neglect of baryon loss over cosmic times. Our analysis suggests that stellar mass estimates based on photometric magnitudes can underestimate the contribution of old stellar populations to the total stellar mass, leading to stellar mass errors of up to 50% for individual galaxies. These results highlight that implementing a realistic high density threshold for SF considerably reduces the overall SF efficiency due to more effective feedback. However, we show that in order to reduce the perceived tension between the SF efficiency in galaxy formation models and in real galaxies, it is very important to use proper techniques to compare simulations with observations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Starburst99: Synthesis Models for Galaxies with Active Star Formation
Leitherer, C., Schaerer, D., Goldader, J. D., Delgado, R. M. G., Robert, C., Kune, D. F., de Mello, D. F., Devost, D., & Heckman, T. M. (1999) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1086/313233 · Cited by 4,126
Core condensation in heavy halos: a two-stage theory for galaxy formation and clustering
White, S. D. M., & Rees, M. J. (1978) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/183.3.341 · Cited by 3,919
The origin of dwarf galaxies, cold dark matter, and biased galaxy formation
Dekel, A., & Silk, J. (1986) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/164050 · Cited by 1,919 · cited 1×
“In the standard Λ Cold Dark Matter (ΛCDM) paradigm (White & Rees 1978; Fall & Efstathiou 1980; Blumenthal et al. 1984; Dekel & Silk 1986; White & Frenk 1991), many galaxy properties are expected to correlate with the mass of the galaxy’s host halo.”
Background
Cited by
The EAGLE project: simulating the evolution and assembly of galaxies and their environments
Schaye, J., Crain, R. A., Bower, R. G., Furlong, M., Schaller, M., Theuns, T., Dalla Vecchia, C., Frenk, C. S., McCarthy, I. G., Helly, J. C., et al. (2015) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stu2058 · Cited by 3,601
The EAGLE simulations of galaxy formation: calibration of subgrid physics and model variations
Crain, R. A., Schaye, J., Bower, R. G., Furlong, M., Schaller, M., Theuns, T., Dalla Vecchia, C., Frenk, C. S., McCarthy, I. G., Helly, J. C., et al. (2015) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stv725 · Cited by 1,451
Simulating galaxy formation with black hole driven thermal and kinetic feedback
Weinberger, R., Springel, V., Hernquist, L., Pillepich, A., Marinacci, F., Pakmor, R., Nelson, D., Genel, S., Vogelsberger, M., Naiman, J., et al. (2017) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stw2944 · Cited by 1,258
Pontzen, A., & Governato, F. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12953 · Cited by 315
Self-citationASSESSING ASTROPHYSICAL UNCERTAINTIES IN DIRECT DETECTION WITH GALAXY SIMULATIONS
Sloane, J. D., Buckley, M. R., Brooks, A. M., & Governato, F. (2016) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/0004-637x/831/1/93 · Cited by 64
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Munshi, F., Governato, F., Brooks, A. M., Christensen, C., Shen, S., Loebman, S., Moster, B., Quinn, T., & Wadsley, J.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2013-03-06
- Volume
- 766
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 56
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2158077998
- Cited by
- 183
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 14.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: REPRODUCING THE STELLAR MASS/HALO MASS RELATION IN SIMULATED ΛCDM GALAXIES: THEORY VERSUS OBSERVATIONAL ESTIMATES. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0004-637x/766/1/56
- The paper
- Munshi, F., Governato, F., Brooks, A. M., Christensen, C., Shen, S., Loebman, S., Moster, B., Quinn, T., & Wadsley, J. (2013). REPRODUCING THE STELLAR MASS/HALO MASS RELATION IN SIMULATED ΛCDM GALAXIES: THEORY VERSUS OBSERVATIONAL ESTIMATES. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637x/766/1/56
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.