The DOI matches its Crossref record.
ON THE NECESSITY OF COMPOSITION-DEPENDENT LOW-TEMPERATURE OPACITY IN MODELS OF METAL-POOR ASYMPTOTIC GIANT BRANCH STARS
Open accessAbstract
The vital importance of composition-dependent low-temperature opacity in low-mass ( M ⩽ 3 M ☉ ) asymptotic giant branch (AGB) stellar models of metallicity Z ⩾ 0.001 has recently been demonstrated. Its significance to more metal-poor, intermediate-mass ( M ⩾ 2.5 M ☉ ) models has yet to be investigated. We show that its inclusion in lower-metallicity models ([Fe/H] ⩽−2) is essential and that there exists no threshold metallicity below which composition-dependent molecular opacity may be neglected. We find it to be crucial in all intermediate-mass models investigated ([Fe/H] ⩽−2 and 2.5 ⩽ M / M ☉ ⩽ 5), because of the evolution of the surface chemistry, including the orders of magnitude increase in the abundance of molecule-forming species. Its effect on these models mirrors that previously reported for higher-metallicity models—increase in radius, decrease in T eff , faster mass loss, shorter thermally pulsing AGB lifetime, reduced enrichment in third dredge-up products (by a factor of 3–10), and an increase in the mass limit for hot bottom burning. We show that the evolution of low-metallicity models with composition-dependent low-temperature opacity is relatively independent of initial metal abundance because its contribution to the opacity is far outweighed by changes resulting from dredge-up. Our results imply a significant reduction in the expected number of nitrogen-enhanced metal-poor stars, which may help explain their observed paucity. We note that these findings are partially a product of the macrophysics adopted in our models, in particular, the Vassiliadis & Wood mass loss rate which is strongly dependent on radius.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There was no threshold in [Fe/H] below which the composition dependent molecular opacities would not produce significant changes.
“Despite claims to the contrary, Constantino et al. (2014) showed that there was no threshold in [ Fe/H ] below which the composition dependent molecular opacities would not produce significant changes.”
From The Dawes Review 2: Nucleosynthesis and Stellar Yields of Low- and Intermediate-Mass Single Stars (2014) · cites this paper as Constantino et al. 2014
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 80
- 10.1086/190349 · DOI
- 10.1086/175039 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1086/161339 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev.astro.46.060407.145222 · DOI · Paper page
- Bessell, 1989, A&AS, 77, 1
- Bloecker, 1995, A&A, 297, 727
- 10.1146/annurev.astro.37.1.239 · DOI
- 10.1051/0004-6361:200809597 · DOI
- Carollo, 2012, ApJ, 744, 195, 10.1088/0004-637X/744/2/195 · DOI
- 10.1051/0004-6361/200913451 · DOI
- 10.1086/176893 · DOI
- 10.1086/163437 · DOI · Paper page
- Cohen, 2005, AJ, 129, 303, 10.1086/426369 · DOI
- 10.1086/183527 · DOI
- Cristallo, 2011, ApJS, 197, 17, 10.1088/0067-0049/197/2/17 · DOI · Paper page
- Cristallo, 2009, ApJ, 696, 797, 10.1088/0004-637X/696/1/797 · DOI · Paper page
- Cristallo, 2007, ApJ, 667, 489, 10.1086/520833 · DOI
- D'Antona, 2005, ApJ, 631, 868, 10.1086/431968 · DOI
- 10.1093/mnras/stt728 · DOI
- Ferguson, 2005, ApJ, 623, 585, 10.1086/428642 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/mnras/stt2313 · DOI
- Frebel, 2006, ApJ, 652, 1585, 10.1086/508506 · DOI
- Frost, 1996, ApJ, 473, 383, 10.1086/178152 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev.astro.42.053102.133945 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1051/0004-6361/201118491 · DOI
- Grevesse, 2007, SSRv, 130, 105
- Herwig, 2000, A&A, 360, 952
- Ivans, 1999, AJ, 118, 1273, 10.1086/301017 · DOI
- 10.1071/AS08036 · DOI
- 10.1051/0004-6361/200912827 · DOI
- Johnson, 2007, ApJ, 658, 1203, 10.1086/510114 · DOI
- 10.1071/AS02013 · DOI · Paper page
- Kennedy, 2011, AJ, 141, 102, 10.1088/0004-6256/141/3/102 · DOI
- Kitsikis, 2008, Mass Loss from Stars and the Evolution of Stellar Clusters, 183
- 10.1086/164810 · DOI
- 10.1051/0004-6361:200810576 · DOI
- Lee, 2005, ApJL, 621, L57, 10.1086/428944 · DOI
- Lucatello, 2006, ApJL, 652, L37, 10.1086/509780 · DOI
- Lucatello, 2005, ApJ, 625, 825, 10.1086/428104 · DOI
- Lucy, 1986, A&A, 154, 267
- Lugaro, 2012, ApJ, 747, 2, 10.1088/0004-637X/747/1/2 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1051/0004-6361:20020304 · DOI
- 10.1051/0004-6361:20066842 · DOI
- 10.1051/0004-6361/200912598 · DOI
- 10.1093/mnras/stt1034 · DOI
- 10.1051/0004-6361/200911744 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11845.x · DOI · Paper page
- Milone, 2013, ApJ, 767, 120, 10.1088/0004-637X/767/2/120 · DOI
- Nieuwenhuijzen, 1990, A&A, 231, 134
- Paczyński, 1970, AcA, 20, 47
- 10.1051/0004-6361/201116592 · DOI
- Paxton, 2013, ApJS, 208, 4, 10.1088/0067-0049/208/1/4 · DOI
- Piotto, 2007, ApJL, 661, L53, 10.1086/518503 · DOI
- 10.1051/0004-6361/201219597 · DOI
- Reimers, 1975, MSRSL, 8, 369
- Rogers, 2002, ApJ, 576, 1064, 10.1086/341894 · DOI
- Rossi, 2005, AJ, 130, 2804, 10.1086/497164 · DOI
- 10.1086/169587 · DOI
- 10.1086/153471 · DOI
- 10.1086/153837 · DOI
- Siess, 2002, ApJ, 570, 329, 10.1086/339733 · DOI
- 10.1051/0004-6361:20041274 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13700.x · DOI
- 10.1051/0004-6361:20066891 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07987.x · DOI
- Straniero, 2006, NuPhA, 777, 311
- 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16473.x · DOI
- 10.1093/mnrasl/slt033 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.17943.x · DOI
- Timmes, 1999, ApJS, 125, 277, 10.1086/313271 · DOI
- Timmes, 2000, ApJS, 126, 501, 10.1086/313304 · DOI
- 10.1086/173033 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15335.x · DOI
- 10.1093/mnras/stt2126 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2009.00722.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17304.x · DOI
- Villanova, 2010, ApJL, 722, L18, 10.1088/2041-8205/722/1/L18 · DOI
- 10.1051/0004-6361/200912043 · DOI
- Wood, 1990, IAP Astrophysics Meeting, Montpellier, France, September 4-7, 1989, From Miras to Planetary Nebulae: Which Path to Stellar Evolution?, 67
- Yong, 2009, ApJL, 695, L62, 10.1088/0004-637X/695/1/L62 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Dawes Review 2: Nucleosynthesis and Stellar Yields of Low- and Intermediate-Mass Single Stars
Karakas, A. I., & Lattanzio, J. C. (2014) · Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia · doi:10.1017/pasa.2014.21 · Cited by 735
“Despite claims to the contrary, Constantino et al. (2014) showed that there was no threshold in [Fe/H] below which the composition dependent molecular opacities would not produce significant changes.”
BackgroundSelf-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Constantino, T., Campbell, S., Gil-Pons, P., & Lattanzio, J.
- Affiliations
- Monash University (AU)
- Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (ES)
- Corresponding author
- Constantino, Thomas
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2014-03-04
- Volume
- 784
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 56
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W1995180331
- Cited by
- 34
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3
- FWCI
- 3.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- The Astrophysical Journal (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Instrumentation › Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
- Keywords
- asymptotic giant branch stars, metal-poor stars, intermediate-mass stars, stellar evolution models, third dredge-up, nitrogen enhancement, hot bottom burning, mass loss, effective temperature, stellar radii, surface chemistry
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review