Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 261

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 79 of the 79 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

HIGH-DENSITY CIRCUMSTELLAR INTERACTION IN THE LUMINOUS TYPE IIn SN 2010jl: THE FIRST 1100 DAYS

Open access
Fransson, Claes, Ergon, Mattias, Challis, Peter J., Chevalier, Roger A., France, Kevin, Kirshner, Robert P., Marion, G. H., Milisavljevic, Dan, Smith, Nathan, Bufano, Filomena, Friedman, Andrew S., Kangas, Tuomas, Larsson, Josefin, Mattila, Seppo, Benetti, Stefano, Chornock, Ryan, Czekala, Ian, Soderberg, Alicia, Sollerman, Jesper·2014·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

Hubble Space Telescope and ground-based observations of the Type IIn supernova (SN) 2010jl are analyzed, including photometry and spectroscopy in the ultraviolet, optical, and near-IR bands, 26–1128 days after first detection. At maximum, the bolometric luminosity was ∼3 × 10 43 erg s −1 and even at 850 days exceeds 10 42 erg s −1 . A near-IR excess, dominating after 400 days, probably originates in dust in the circumstellar medium (CSM). The total radiated energy is ≳ 6.5 × 10 50 erg, excluding the dust component. The spectral lines can be separated into one broad component that is due to electron scattering and one narrow with expansion velocity ∼100 km s −1 from the CSM. The broad component is initially symmetric around zero velocity but becomes blueshifted after ∼50 days, while remaining symmetric about a shifted centroid velocity. Dust absorption in the ejecta is unlikely to explain the line shifts, and we attribute the shift instead to acceleration by the SN radiation. From the optical lines and the X-ray and dust properties, there is strong evidence for large-scale asymmetries in the CSM. The ultraviolet lines indicate CNO processing in the progenitor, while the optical shows a number of narrow coronal lines excited by the X-rays. The bolometric light curve is consistent with a radiative shock in an r −2 CSM with a mass-loss rate of . The total mass lost is ≳ 3 M ☉ . These properties are consistent with the SN expanding into a CSM characteristic of a luminous blue variable progenitor with a bipolar geometry. The apparent absence of nuclear processing is attributed to a CSM that is still opaque to electron scattering.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0004-637x/797/2/118

Cites

79 of 79 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 79 references

Cited by

See all 261

Metadata

Authors
Fransson, C., Ergon, M., Challis, P. J., Chevalier, R. A., France, K., Kirshner, R. P., Marion, G. H., Milisavljevic, D., Smith, N., Bufano, F., Friedman, A. S., Kangas, T., Larsson, J., Mattila, S., Benetti, S., Chornock, R., Czekala, I., Soderberg, A., & Sollerman, J.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2014-12-08
Volume
797
Issue
2
Pages
118
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W2049024396
Cited by
261
References
79
FWCI
13.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: HIGH-DENSITY CIRCUMSTELLAR INTERACTION IN THE LUMINOUS TYPE IIn SN 2010jl: THE FIRST 1100 DAYS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0004-637x/797/2/118
The paper
Fransson, C., Ergon, M., Challis, P. J., Chevalier, R. A., France, K., Kirshner, R. P., Marion, G. H., Milisavljevic, D., Smith, N., Bufano, F., Friedman, A. S., Kangas, T., Larsson, J., Mattila, S., Benetti, S., Chornock, R., Czekala, I., Soderberg, A., & Sollerman, J. (2014). HIGH-DENSITY CIRCUMSTELLAR INTERACTION IN THE LUMINOUS TYPE IIn SN 2010jl: THE FIRST 1100 DAYS. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637x/797/2/118

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.