The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
MOST 1.6 EARTH-RADIUS PLANETS ARE NOT ROCKY
Open accessAbstract
The Kepler mission, combined with ground-based radial velocity (RV) follow-up and dynamical analyses of transit timing variations, has revolutionized the observational constraints on sub-Neptune-sized planet compositions. The results of an extensive Kepler follow-up program including multiple Doppler measurements for 22 planet-hosting stars more than doubles the population of sub-Neptune-sized transiting planets that have RV mass constraints. This unprecedentedly large and homogeneous sample of planets with both mass and radius constraints opens the possibility of a statistical study of the underlying population of planet compositions. We focus on the intriguing transition between rocky exoplanets (comprised of iron and silicates) and planets with voluminous layers of volatiles (H/He and astrophysical ices). Applying a hierarchical Bayesian statistical approach to the sample of Kepler transiting sub-Neptune planets with Keck RV follow-up, we constrain the fraction of close-in planets (with orbital periods less than ∼50 days) that are sufficiently dense to be rocky, as a function of planet radius. We show that the majority of planets have too low density to be comprised of Fe and silicates alone. At larger radii, the constraints on the fraction of rocky planets are even more stringent. These insights into the size demographics of rocky and volatile-rich planets offer empirical constraints to planet formation theories, and guide the range of planet radii to be considered in studies of the occurrence rate of "Earth-like" planets, .
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
UNDERSTANDING THE MASS-RADIUS RELATION FOR SUB-NEPTUNES: RADIUS AS A PROXY FOR COMPOSITION
Lopez, E. D., & Fortney, J. J. (2014) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/792/1/1 · Cited by 722
THE MASS-RADIUS RELATION FOR 65 EXOPLANETS SMALLER THAN 4 EARTH RADII
Weiss, L. M., & Marcy, G. W. (2014) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/2041-8205/783/1/l6 · Cited by 665
Kepler-22b: A 2.4 EARTH-RADIUS PLANET IN THE HABITABLE ZONE OF A SUN-LIKE STAR
Borucki, W. J., Koch, D. G., Batalha, N., Bryson, S. T., Rowe, J., Fressin, F., Torres, G., Caldwell, D. A., Christensen-Dalsgaard, J., Cochran, W. D., et al. (2012) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/745/2/120 · Cited by 241
DENSITY AND ECCENTRICITY OF KEPLER PLANETS
Wu, Y., & Lithwick, Y. (2013) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/772/1/74 · Cited by 231
Cited by
Accurate Empirical Radii and Masses of Planets and Their Host Stars with Gaia Parallaxes
Stassun, K. G., Collins, K. A., & Gaudi, B. S. (2017) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aa5df3 · Cited by 459
Thompson, S. E., Coughlin, J. L., Hoffman, K., Mullally, F., Christiansen, J. L., Burke, C. J., Bryson, S., Batalha, N., Haas, M. R., Catanzarite, J., et al. (2018) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.3847/1538-4365/aab4f9 · Cited by 429
The California-Kepler Survey. IV. Metal-rich Stars Host a Greater Diversity of Planets
Petigura, E. A., Marcy, G. W., Winn, J. N., Weiss, L. M., Fulton, B. J., Howard, A. W., Sinukoff, E., Isaacson, H., Morton, T. D., & Johnson, J. A. (2018) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aaa54c · Cited by 363
Weiss, L. M., Marcy, G. W., Petigura, E. A., Fulton, B. J., Howard, A. W., Winn, J. N., Isaacson, H. T., Morton, T. D., Hirsch, L. A., Sinukoff, E. J., et al. (2018) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aa9ff6 · Cited by 328
The habitability of planets orbiting M-dwarf stars
Shields, A. L., Ballard, S., & Johnson, J. A. (2016) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2016.10.003 · Cited by 319
Metadata
- Authors
- Rogers, L. A.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2015-03-02
- Volume
- 801
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 41
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2078100842
- Cited by
- 790
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 63.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: MOST 1.6 EARTH-RADIUS PLANETS ARE NOT ROCKY. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0004-637x/801/1/41
- The paper
- Rogers, L. A. (2015). MOST 1.6 EARTH-RADIUS PLANETS ARE NOT ROCKY. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637x/801/1/41
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.