Cited by 83Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation StudiesNeuroscience and Neural EngineeringElectromagnetic Fields and Biological Effects

Tissue heterogeneity as a mechanism for localized neural stimulation by applied electric fields

Miranda, P C, Correia, L, Salvador, R, Basser, P J·2007·Physics in Medicine and Biology

Abstract

We investigate the heterogeneity of electrical conductivity as a new mechanism to stimulate excitable tissues via applied electric fields. In particular, we show that stimulation of axons crossing internal boundaries can occur at boundaries where the electric conductivity of the volume conductor changes abruptly. The effectiveness of this and other stimulation mechanisms was compared by means of models and computer simulations in the context of transcranial magnetic stimulation. While, for a given stimulation intensity, the largest membrane depolarization occurred where an axon terminates or bends sharply in a high electric field region, a slightly smaller membrane depolarization, still sufficient to generate action potentials, also occurred at an internal boundary where the conductivity jumped from 0.143 S m(-1) to 0.333 S m(-1), simulating a white-matter-grey-matter interface. Tissue heterogeneity can also give rise to local electric field gradients that are considerably stronger and more focal than those impressed by the stimulation coil and that can affect the membrane potential, albeit to a lesser extent than the two mechanisms mentioned above. Tissue heterogeneity may play an important role in electric and magnetic 'far-field' stimulation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0031-9155/52/18/009

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For purely resistive tissues, the secondary field depends only on the ratio of the conductivities of the two adjacent tissues, and is proportional to the strength of the normal component of the applied electric field.

    “For purely resistive tissues, the secondary field depends only on the ratio of the conductivities of the two adjacent tissues, and is proportional to the strength of the normal component of the applied electric field (Miranda et al., 2007).”
  • The existence of electric field hotspots is due to a secondary electric field generated by charge accumulation at tissue interfaces.

    “The existence of electric field hotspots is due to a secondary electric field generated by charge accumulation at tissue interfaces.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Miranda, P. C., Correia, L., Salvador, R., & Basser, P. J.
Affiliations
University of Lisbon (PT)
Venue
Physics in Medicine and Biology
Published
2007-09-03
Volume
52
Issue
18
Pages
5603-5617
ISSN
  • 0031-9155 (ISSN-L)
  • 1361-6560
OpenAlex
W2156898443
Cited by
83
References
43
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 8
FWCI
2.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Physics in Medicine and Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Electromagnetic Fields and Biological Effects
Keywords
tissue heterogeneity, electrical conductivity, electrical field stimulation, membrane depolarization, action potential, volume conductor, internal borders, electric field gradient, transcranial magnetic stimulation, excitable tissues
MeSH terms
Action Potentials, Animals, Computer Simulation, Electric Stimulation, Electromagnetic Fields, Humans, Models, Neurological, Nerve Net, Neurons

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review