Quantum Speed Limit of a Photon under Non-Markovian Dynamics
Open accessAbstract
Quantum speed limit (QSL) time under noise has drawn considerable attention in real quantum computational processes. Though non-Markovian noise is found to be able to accelerate quantum evolution for a damped Jaynes—Cummings model, in this work we show that non-Markovianity will slow down the quantum evolution of an experimentally controllable photon system. As an application, QSL time of a photon can be controlled by regulating the relevant environment parameter properly, which nearly reaches the currently available photonic experimental technology.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The expression for the quantum speed limit time and its behavior sensitively depend on the choice of the initial state.
“However, it was also pointed out that the expression for τ QSL , and hence its behaviour sensitively depends on the choice of the initial state [152], which was confirmed by Zhu and Xu [153].”
From Quantum speed limits: from Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle to optimal quantum control (2017) · cites this paper as [152]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Measure for the Degree of Non-Markovian Behavior of Quantum Processes in Open Systems
Breuer, H.-P., Laine, E.-M., & Piilo, J. (2009) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.103.210401 · Cited by 1,480 · see citing works
Multiphoton entanglement and interferometry
Pan, J.-W., Chen, Z.-B., Lu, C.-Y., Weinfurter, H., Zeilinger, A., & Żukowski, M. (2012) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.84.777 · Cited by 1,410 · cited 1× · see citing works
“test bed to explore the foundations of quantum physics as well as quantum information processing [23, 24].”
BackgroundUltimate physical limits to computation
Lloyd, S. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35023282 · Cited by 1,120 · see citing works
Entanglement and Non-Markovianity of Quantum Evolutions
Rivas, Á., Huelga, S. F., & Plenio, M. B. (2010) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.105.050403 · Cited by 1,037 · see citing works
The maximum speed of dynamical evolution
Margolus, N., & Levitin, L. B. (1998) · Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena · doi:10.1016/s0167-2789(98)00054-2 · Cited by 887 · see citing works
Optimal Control at the Quantum Speed Limit
Caneva, T., Murphy, M., Calarco, T., Fazio, R., Montangero, S., Giovannetti, V., & Santoro, G. E. (2009) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.103.240501 · Cited by 509 · see citing works
Quantum Speed Limits in Open System Dynamics
del Campo, A., Egusquiza, I. L., Plenio, M. B., & Huelga, S. F. (2013) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.110.050403 · Cited by 493 · see citing works
Fundamental Limit on the Rate of Quantum Dynamics: The Unified Bound Is Tight
Levitin, L. B., & Toffoli, T. (2009) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.103.160502 · Cited by 302 · see citing works
A unitarity bound on the evolution of nonstationary states
Fleming, G. N. (1973) · Il Nuovo Cimento A · doi:10.1007/bf02819419 · Cited by 218 · see citing works
Energy–time uncertainty relation for driven quantum systems
Deffner, S., & Lutz, E. (2013) · Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical · doi:10.1088/1751-8113/46/33/335302 · Cited by 199 · see citing works
Geometric derivation of the quantum speed limit
Jones, P. J., & Kok, P. (2010) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.82.022107 · Cited by 172 · cited 1× · see citing works
“These bounds, providing a fundamental limit of the operation rate, are applicable to considerable quantum tasks such as quantum state transfer [9], quantum optimal control [10], and quantum metrology [11] and have been extended to nonorthogonal state cases [12–16] and derived from geometric aspects [17, 18].”
BackgroundQuantum speed limit for perfect state transfer in one dimension
Yung, M.-H. (2006) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.74.030303 · Cited by 128 · see citing works
Comparing different non-Markovianity measures in a driven qubit system
Haikka, P., Cresser, J. D., & Maniscalco, S. (2011) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.83.012112 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
The rate of evolution of a quantum state
Uffink, J. (1993) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.17368 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Probing the degree of non-Markovianity for independent and common environments
Fanchini, F. F., Karpat, G., Castelano, L. K., & Rossatto, D. Z. (2013) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.88.012105 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
On Decaying Rate of Quantum States
Luo, S., & Zhang, Z. (2005) · Letters in Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1007/s11005-004-5095-4 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [28]M. Born and E. Wolf, 'Principles of Optics', (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1999).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Quantum speed limits: from Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle to optimal quantum control
Deffner, S., & Campbell, S. (2017) · Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical · doi:10.1088/1751-8121/aa86c6 · Cited by 585 · see citing works
Trade-Off Between Speed and Cost in Shortcuts to Adiabaticity
Campbell, S., & Deffner, S. (2017) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.118.100601 · Cited by 235 · see citing works
Environment-Assisted Speed-up of the Field Evolution in Cavity Quantum Electrodynamics
Cimmarusti, A. D., Yan, Z., Patterson, B. D., Corcos, L. P., Orozco, L. A., & Deffner, S. (2015) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.114.233602 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
Quantum coherence sets the quantum speed limit for mixed states
Mondal, D., Datta, C., & Sazim, S. (2016) · Physics Letters A · doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2015.12.015 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Quantum-speed-limit time for multiqubit open systems
Liu, C., Xu, Z.-Y., & Zhu, S. (2015) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.91.022102 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Self-citationGeometric quantum speed limits: a case for Wigner phase space
Deffner, S. (2017) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/aa83dc · Cited by 78 · see citing works
- Authors
- Xu, Z.-Y., & Zhu, S.-Q.
- Venue
- Chinese Physics Letters
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2014-02
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 020301
- ISSN
- 0256-307X (ISSN-L)
- 1741-3540
- OpenAlex
- W2204744922
- Cited by
- 33
- References
- 16
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 3.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Chinese Physics Letters (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum optics and atomic interactions
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
- Keywords
- quantum speed limit, non-Markovian dynamics, photon dynamics, non-Markovianity, quantum evolution, environmental noise, photonic systems
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
