Cited by 79Quantum Mechanics and ApplicationsQuantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureQuantum Information and Cryptography

Geometric quantum speed limits: a case for Wigner phase space

Open access
Deffner, Sebastian·2017·New Journal of Physics

Abstract

The quantum speed limit is a fundamental upper bound on the speed of quantum evolution. However, the actual mathematical expression of this fundamental limit depends on the choice of a measure of distinguishability of quantum states. We show that quantum speed limits are qualitatively governed by the Schatten- p -norm of the generator of quantum dynamics. Since computing Schatten- p -norms can be mathematically involved, we then develop an alternative approach in Wigner phase space. We find that the quantum speed limit in Wigner space is fully equivalent to expressions in density operator space, but that the new bound is significantly easier to compute. Our results are illustrated for the parametric harmonic oscillator and for quantum Brownian motion.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1367-2630/aa83dc

Cites

46 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 2 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Reference [53] proposes a bound with a straightforward experimental interpretation, but it is orbit-dependent, valid only for nondegenerate states, and lacks an explicit relation between purity and minimal evolution time.

    “Reference [53] proposes a bound that has a straightforward experimental interpretation, but that is obtained from an orbit-dependent distance, is valid only for nondegenerate states, and does not provide an explicit relation between the purity of the state and the minimal time of evolution.”

    From Tightening Quantum Speed Limits for Almost All States (2018) · cites this paper as [53]

  • An equivalent and more tractable quantum speed limit can be derived using the Wigner representation, where the rate of Wasserstein-p-distance is bounded by the Wigner function norm, as in equation (119).

    “It was shown in [188] that if one considers the rate of Wasserstein-p-distance D p (W t , W 0 ) = W t -W 0 p ≡ dΓ |W(Γ, t) -W 0 (Γ)| p 1/p ,(118) one can derive Ḋp (W t , W 0 ) Ẇt p = v W QSL . (119”
  • The Schatten-p and Wasserstein-p expressions (116) and (119) are fully equivalent up to normalization.

    “The two expressions (116) and (119) are fully equivalent up to normalization [188].”
  • Independent of the choice of measure, quantum speed is universally characterised by the Schatten-p-norm of the generator of the dynamics, and this norm can be computed from the Wasserstein-p-norm of the corresponding Wigner function.

    “In conclusion, it was shown in [188] that, independent of the choice of measure, the quantum speed is universally characterised by the Schatten-p-norm of the generator of the dynamics.Moreover, this Schatten-p-norm can be computed from the mathematically tractable Wasserstein-p-norm of the corresponding Wigner function.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Bengtsson I and Zyczkowski K 2007 Geometry of Quantum States: An Introduction to Quantum Entanglement (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
  2. Deffner S and Campbell S 2017 Quantum speed limits: from Heisenberg's uncertainty principle to optimal quantum control J. Phys. A: Math Theor. in press
  3. Simon B 1979 Trace Ideals and Their Applications vol 35 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
  4. Schleich W P 2011 Quantum Optics in Phase Space (New York: Wiley)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Deffner, S.
Affiliations
University of Maryland, Baltimore County (US)
Corresponding author
Deffner, Sebastian
Venue
New Journal of Physics
Published
2017-10-23
Volume
19
Issue
10
Pages
103018
ISSN
1367-2630 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2607459592
Cited by
78
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 1
FWCI
3.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • New Journal of Physics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Directorate for Biological Sciences (CHE-1648973)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
Keywords
quantum speed limit, Wigner phase space, Schatten p-norm, quantum state distinguishability, quantum Brownian motion, quantum evolution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review