Cited by 569Relativity and Gravitational TheoryCosmology and Gravitation TheoriesBlack Holes and Theoretical Physics

The warp drive: hyper-fast travel within general relativity

Open access
Alcubierre, Miguel·1994·Classical and Quantum Gravity

Abstract

It is shown how, within the framework of general relativity and without the introduction of wormholes, it is possible to modify a spacetime in a way that allows a spaceship to travel with an arbitrarily large speed. By a purely local expansion of spacetime behind the spaceship and an opposite contraction in front of it, motion faster than the speed of light as seen by observers outside the disturbed region is possible. The resulting distortion is reminiscent of the `warp drive' of science fiction. However, just as happens with wormholes, exotic matter will be needed in order to generate a distortion of spacetime like the one discussed here.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0264-9381/11/5/001

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the Alcubierre warp bubble, the NEC, SEC, WEC, and DEC are all explicitly violated.

    “In this situation explicit computation shows that the NEC, and so the SEC, WEC and DEC, are all explicitly violated.See specifically the original discussion in [1], and the subsequent follow-up discussions in [12][13][14][15][16][17], and [20,21].”

    From ADM mass in warp drive spacetimes (2023) · cites this paper as [1]

    In L77 (p. 77), Alcubierre explicitly says the metric violates the weak, dominant, and strong energy conditions. Our copy does not explicitly discuss or demonstrate violation of the null energy condition, so it does not support the claim that all four are explicitly violated. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • For the Alcubierre warp bubble, the flow field is auto-parallel.

    “For the Alcubierre warp bubble the flow field v(t, x) is auto-parallel. That is v(t, x) = v(t, x) v;v = (constant).”

    From ADM mass in warp drive spacetimes (2023) · cites this paper as [1]

    In the passage labelled U 5, Alcubierre says the timelike curves of the Eulerian observers are geodesics. The L76 passage also says the spaceship follows a geodesic. Those statements support geodesic motion in the warp-bubble spacetime, but our copy does not state that the spatial flow field v(t, x) itself is auto-parallel or satisfies the citing sentence’s equation. (LLM, conf=0.79)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The transport logistics of the presented positive-energy solitons are similar to the solitons of the Alcubierre solution.

    “The transport logistics of the presented positive-energy solitons are similar to the solitons of the Alcubierre solution.”

    From Breaking the warp barrier: hyper-fast solitons in Einstein–Maxwell-plasma theory (2021) · cites this paper as [1]

    The passages labeled L74 and L77 describe Alcubierre’s transport mechanism: a spaceship is carried by a local spacetime distortion, with expansion behind it and contraction ahead. They do not discuss the citing paper’s positive-energy solitons or establish the claimed similarity. L77 also says Alcubierre’s metric requires negative energy density. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The solution of [1] possesses only one negative expansion lobe at the leading edge of its soliton and one positive expansion lobe at the trailing edge.

    “The solution of [1] possesses only one negative expansion lobe at the leading edge of its soliton and one positive expansion lobe at the trailing edge.”

    From Breaking the warp barrier: hyper-fast solitons in Einstein–Maxwell-plasma theory (2021) · cites this paper as [1]

    The introduction (L74) describes expansion behind the spaceship and contraction ahead of it; the discussion of Figure 1 (section (11)) repeats that pattern. These passages support the locations and signs of the expansion regions, but the available text does not establish the claim that there is only one lobe of each sign. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The largest values of θ for the positive-energy soliton coincide with the sources of stress-energy density, in contrast to the solution of Ref. [1] where the energy density and expansion factor are maximally separated on the soliton boundary.

    “The largest values of θ for the positive-energy soliton coincide with the sources of stress-energy density, in contrast to the solution of Ref. [1] where the energy density and expansion factor are maximally separated on the soliton boundary.”

    From Breaking the warp barrier: hyper-fast solitons in Einstein–Maxwell-plasma theory (2021) · cites this paper as [1]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 1 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [2]2. Hawking S W and Ellis G F R 1973 7'ke Large Scale Srrucrure ofSpncerime (Cambridge: Cambridge Univesily
  2. [3]3. DeWin B S 1979 General Relariviry: An &insrein Cenlemwy Sumey ed S W Hawking and W Israel (Cambridge: Smarr (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) pp 8>126 PES) Cambridge Univeniiy Press)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Alcubierre, M.
Affiliations
University of Wales (GB)
Corresponding author
Alcubierre, Miguel
Venue
Classical and Quantum Gravity
Published
1994-05-01
Volume
11
Issue
5
Pages
L73-L77
ISSN
  • 0264-9381 (ISSN-L)
  • 1361-6382
OpenAlex
W2118757814
Cited by
569
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 21
FWCI
8.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Classical and Quantum Gravity (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
Keywords
warp drive, faster-than-light travel, general relativity, spacetime distortion, exotic matter, wormholes, superluminal motion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review