Cited by 70Relativity and Gravitational TheoryCosmology and Gravitation TheoriesAdvanced Differential Geometry Research

Warp drive with zero expansion

Open access
Natário, José·2002·Classical and Quantum Gravity

Abstract

It is commonly believed that Alcubierre's warp drive works by contracting space in front of the warp bubble and expanding the space behind it. We show that this contraction/expansion is but a marginal consequence of the choice made by Alcubierre and explicitly construct a similar spacetime where no contraction/expansion occurs. Global and optical properties of warp-drive spacetimes are also discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0264-9381/19/6/308

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the zero-expansion warp bubble, the NEC, SEC, WEC, and DEC are all explicitly violated.

    “In this situation explicit computation shows that the NEC, and so the SEC, WEC and DEC, are all explicitly violated.See specifically the original discussion in [2], and subsequent follow-up discussions in [14][15][16][17], and [20].”

    From ADM mass in warp drive spacetimes (2023) · cites this paper as [2]

    Section 2 calculates negative energy density for the zero-expansion warp bubble, supporting violation of the WEC. Theorem 1.7 (Section 1, p. 1160) says non-flat warp drives violate either the weak or the strong energy condition. Our copy does not explicitly compute NEC violation or establish that this bubble violates all four named conditions. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Natario presents a general argument that in any generic warp spacetime, including Alcubierre, Natario zero-expansion, and Lentz/Fell-Heisenberg zero-vorticity, there must be violations of either the SEC or the WEC, or the trivial case of Minkowski space.

    “note that in reference [10] Nat´ ario presents a quite general argument to the effect that in any generic warp spacetime, (Alcubierre, Nat´ ario zero-expansion, and, yes, it even applies to Lentz/Fell-Heisenberg zero-vorticity warp drives), there must be violations of either the SEC or the WEC. (Or you have the trivial case of Minkowski space.) See his theorem 1.7.”

    From Generic warp drives violate the null energy condition (2022) · cites this paper as [10]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The non-unit-lapse and van den Broeck warp drive spacetimes are physically different from the Natário class (unit lapse, spatially flat 3-geometry).

    “There are other problematic issues with both of these models, but they are physically different from the Nat´ ario class [10], (unit lapse, spatially flat 3-geometry), and must be directly addressed using different techniques.”

    From Generic warp drives violate the null energy condition (2022) · cites this paper as [10]

    Definition 1.1 (§1, p. 1159) defines Natário’s warp-drive spacetimes with a unit-lapse line element and explicitly says their spatial slices have a flat Euclidean metric. Our copy does not discuss non-unit-lapse or van den Broeck spacetimes, so it does not establish the asserted physical difference or the need for different techniques. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The multi-compartment structure is a distinct departure from the single top-hat soliton found in [1] and [11].

    “The multi-compartment structure is a distinct departure from the single top-hat soliton fond in [1] and [11].”

    From Breaking the warp barrier: hyper-fast solitons in Einstein–Maxwell-plasma theory (2021) · cites this paper as [11]

    Section 2 describes one warp bubble with an interior and exterior, which supports the single-bubble part of the comparison. The paper does not describe that bubble as a “top-hat soliton,” so it does not establish that more specific characterization. No page number is available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The Natário generic warp bubbles all have line elements of the form ds^2 = -dt^2 + δ_ij (dx^i - v^i(t,x)dt)(dx^j - v^j(t,x)dt).

    “The Natário generic warp bubbles all have line elements explicitly of the form [2]:”

    From ADM mass in warp drive spacetimes (2023) · cites this paper as [2]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [1]1. Acheson D 1998 Elementary Fluid Mechanics (Oxford: Oxford University Press)
  2. [5]5. Landau L and Lifshitz E 1997 The Classical Theory of Fields (Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann)
  3. [7]7. Schneider P, Ehlers J and Falco E 1992 Gravitational Lenses (Berlin: Springer)
  4. [9]9. Wald R 1984 General Relativity (Chicago: University of Chicago Press)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Natário, J.
Affiliations
Instituto Superior Técnico (PT)
Corresponding author
Natário, José
Venue
Classical and Quantum Gravity
Published
2002-03-05
Volume
19
Issue
6
Pages
1157-1165
ISSN
  • 0264-9381 (ISSN-L)
  • 1361-6382
OpenAlex
W1977770919
Cited by
70
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Classical and Quantum Gravity (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Advanced Differential Geometry Research
Keywords
warp drive, Alcubierre metric, warp bubble, superluminal travel

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review