The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Analogue gravity from Bose-Einstein condensates
Open accessAbstract
We analyse prospects for the use of Bose-Einstein condensates as condensed-matter systems suitable for generating a generic `effective metric', and for mimicking kinematic aspects of general relativity. We extend the analysis due to Garay et al (2000 Phys. Rev. Lett. 85 4643, 2001 Phys. Rev. A 63 023611). Taking a long-term view, we ask what the ultimate limits of such a system might be. To this end, we consider a very general version of the nonlinear Schrödinger equation (with a 3-tensor position-dependent mass and arbitrary nonlinearity). Such equations can be used, for example, in discussing Bose-Einstein condensates in heterogeneous and highly nonlinear systems. We demonstrate that at low momenta linearized excitations of the phase of the condensate wavefunction obey a (3 + 1)-dimensional d'Alembertian equation coupling to a (3 + 1)-dimensional Lorentzian-signature `effective metric' that is generic, and depends algebraically on the background field. Thus at low momenta this system serves as an analogue for the curved spacetime of general relativity. In contrast, at high momenta we demonstrate how one can use the eikonal approximation to extract a well controlled Bogoliubov-like dispersion relation, and (perhaps unexpectedly) recover non-relativistic Newtonian physics at high momenta. Bose-Einstein condensates appear to be an extremely promising analogue system for probing kinematic aspects of general relativity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Suggested Interpretation of the Quantum Theory in Terms of "Hidden" Variables. I
Bohm, D. (1952) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.85.166 · Cited by 5,510
Experimental Black-Hole Evaporation?
Unruh, W. G. (1981) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.46.1351 · Cited by 1,774
Gravity with a dynamical preferred frame
Jacobson, T., & Mattingly, D. (2001) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.64.024028 · Cited by 944
Zur Lichtfortpflanzung nach der Relativitätstheorie
Gordon, W. (1923) · Annalen der Physik · doi:10.1002/andp.19233772202 · Cited by 294
Cited by
Barceló, C., Liberati, S., & Visser, M. (2005) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2005-12 · Cited by 1,163
Self-citationGeneral relativistic boson stars
Schunck, F. E., & Mielke, E. W. (2003) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/20/20/201 · Cited by 745
Observation of quantum Hawking radiation and its entanglement in an analogue black hole
Steinhauer, J. (2016) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys3863 · Cited by 640
Barceló, C., Liberati, S., & Visser, M. (2011) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2011-3 · Cited by 598
Self-citationQuantum simulations of lattice gauge theories using ultracold atoms in optical lattices
Zohar, E., Cirac, J. I., & Reznik, B. (2016) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/79/1/014401 · Cited by 422
Metadata
- Authors
- Barceló, C., Liberati, S., & Visser, M.
- Venue
- Classical and Quantum Gravity
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2001-03-14
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1137-1156
- ISSN
- 0264-9381 (ISSN-L)
- 1361-6382
- OpenAlex
- W1992495657
- Cited by
- 284
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 7.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Analogue gravity from Bose-Einstein condensates. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0264-9381/18/6/312
- The paper
- Barceló, C., Liberati, S., & Visser, M. (2001). Analogue gravity from Bose-Einstein condensates. Classical and Quantum Gravity. https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/18/6/312
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.