Cited by 18Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesAdvanced Operator Algebra ResearchRelativity and Gravitational Theory

Automorphism covariant representations of the holonomy-flux lowast-algebra

Open access
Okołów, Andrzej, Lewandowski, Jerzy·2005·Classical and Quantum Gravity

Abstract

We continue the analysis of representations of cylindrical functions and fluxes which are commonly used as elementary variables of loop quantum gravity. We consider an arbitrary principal bundle of a compact connected structure group and, following Sahlmann's ideas (Sahlmann 2002 Preprint gr-qc/0207111), define a holonomy-flux ∗-algebra whose elements correspond to the elementary variables. There exists a natural action of automorphisms of the bundle on the algebra; this action generalizes the action of analytic diffeomorphisms and gauge transformations on the algebra considered in earlier works. We define the automorphism covariance of a ∗-representation of the algebra on a Hilbert space and prove that the only Hilbert space admitting such a representation is a direct sum of the spaces L 2 , given by a unique measure on the space of generalized connections. This result is a generalization of our previous work (Okołów and Lewandowski 2003 Class. Quantum Grav. 20 3543–67 ( Preprint gr-qc/0302059)) where we assumed that the principal bundle is trivial and its base manifold is .

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0264-9381/22/4/002

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Given a flux vector field X_{S,f}, the map Ad ̃φ maps the generalized flow into the flow of the flux vector field X_{φ(S), ̃φ∗f}.

    “Given a flux vector field X S,f , the map Ad ˜ ϕ defined above maps the generalized flow (17) into a new flow Ad ˜ ϕ θ ( · ) . It is easy to check, that the new flow is the flow of the flux vector field X ϕ ( S ) , ˜ ϕ ∗ f [20], hence”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [18][18] Okosuppress l´ ow A 2004 Representations of Quantum Geometry, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Warsaw

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Okołów, A., & Lewandowski, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Warsaw (PL)
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
Venue
Classical and Quantum Gravity
Published
2005-01-25
Volume
22
Issue
4
Pages
657-679
ISSN
  • 0264-9381 (ISSN-L)
  • 1361-6382
OpenAlex
W3101097682
Cited by
18
References
20
Citations by year
2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Classical and Quantum Gravity (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Mathematical Physics › Advanced Operator Algebra Research
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
Keywords
loop quantum gravity, principal bundles, cylindrical functions, flux, generalized connections, gauge transformations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review