Cited by 99Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesRelativity and Gravitational TheoryAdvanced Operator Algebra Research

Quantum spin dynamics: VIII. The master constraint

Open access
Thiemann, Thomas·2006·Classical and Quantum Gravity

Abstract

Recently the Master Constraint Programme (MCP) for Loop Quantum Gravity (LQG) was launched which replaces the infinite number of Hamiltonian constraints by a single Master constraint. The MCP is designed to overcome the complications associated with the non -- Lie -- algebra structure of the Dirac algebra of Hamiltonian constraints and was successfully tested in various field theory models. For the case of 3+1 gravity itself, so far only a positive quadratic form for the Master Constraint Operator was derived. In this paper we close this gap and prove that the quadratic form is closable and thus stems from a unique self -- adjoint Master Constraint Operator. The proof rests on a simple feature of the general pattern according to which Hamiltonian constraints in LQG are constructed and thus extends to arbitrary matter coupling and holds for any metric signature. With this result the existence of a physical Hilbert space for LQG is established by standard spectral analysis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0264-9381/23/7/003

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent results indicate that the Barrett-Crane theory appears to fail to yield the correct tensorial structure of the graviton propagator in the low-energy limit.

    “Worse, recent results [14] indicate that it appear to fail to yield the correct tensorial structure of the graviton propagator in the low-energy limit [15].”

    From Flipped spinfoam vertex and loop gravity (2008) · cites this paper as [14]

  • A richer boundary space is needed for a correct classical limit.

    “as well as by the realization that a richer boundary space is needed for a correct classical limit [14].”

    From Flipped spinfoam vertex and loop gravity (2008) · cites this paper as [14]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Thiemann, T.
Corresponding author
Thiemann, Thomas
Venue
Classical and Quantum Gravity
Published
2006-03-14
Volume
23
Issue
7
Pages
2249-2265
ISSN
  • 0264-9381 (ISSN-L)
  • 1361-6382
OpenAlex
W2036644868
Cited by
99
References
48
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 7
FWCI
6.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Classical and Quantum Gravity (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Institut Périmètre de physique théorique
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Mathematical Physics › Advanced Operator Algebra Research
Keywords
loop quantum gravity, Hamiltonian constraint, self-adjoint operators, physical Hilbert space, Dirac algebra, matter coupling, spectral analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review