The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Black holes in Einstein-aether theory
Open accessAbstract
We study black hole solutions in general relativity coupled to a unit timelike vector field dubbed the "aether". To be causally isolated a black hole interior must trap matter fields as well as all aether and metric modes. The theory possesses spin-0, spin-1, and spin-2 modes whose speeds depend on four coupling coefficients. We find that the full three-parameter family of local spherically symmetric static solutions is always regular at a metric horizon, but only a two-parameter subset is regular at a spin-0 horizon. Asymptotic flatness imposes another condition, leaving a one-parameter family of regular black holes. These solutions are compared to the Schwarzschild solution using numerical integration for a special class of coupling coefficients. They are very close to Schwarzschild outside the horizon for a wide range of couplings, and have a spacelike singularity inside, but differ inside quantitatively. Some quantities constructed from the metric and aether oscillate in the interior as the singularity is approached. The aether is at rest at spatial infinity and flows into the black hole, but differs significantly from the the 4-velocity of freely-falling geodesics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lorentz-violating vector fields slow the universe down
Carroll, S., & Lim, E. (2004) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.70.123525 · Cited by 340
Constraining the New Aether: gravitational Cherenkov radiation
Elliott, J. W., Moore, G. D., & Stoica, H. (2005) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2005/08/066 · Cited by 204
Cited by
Quasinormal modes of black holes: From astrophysics to string theory
Konoplya, R. A., & Zhidenko, A. (2011) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.83.793 · Cited by 1,532
Black holes, gravitational waves and fundamental physics: a roadmap
Askar, A., Belczynski, C., Bertone, G., Bon, E., Blas, D., Brito, R., Bulik, T., Burrage, C., Byrnes, C. T., Caprini, C., et al. (2019) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ab0587 · Cited by 744
Can environmental effects spoil precision gravitational-wave astrophysics?
Barausse, E., Cardoso, V., & Pani, P. (2014) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.89.104059 · Cited by 605
Yunes, N., & Pretorius, F. (2009) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.80.122003 · Cited by 497
Metadata
- Authors
- Eling, C., & Jacobson, T.
- Venue
- Classical and Quantum Gravity
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2006-08-21
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 18
- Pages
- 5643-5660
- ISSN
- 0264-9381 (ISSN-L)
- 1361-6382
- OpenAlex
- W2019364320
- Cited by
- 166
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 4.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Black holes in Einstein-aether theory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0264-9381/23/18/009
- The paper
- Eling, C., & Jacobson, T. (2006). Black holes in Einstein-aether theory. Classical and Quantum Gravity. https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/23/18/009
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.