The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Representations of the holonomy algebras of gravity and nonAbelian gauge theories
Open accessAbstract
Holonomy algebras arise naturally in the classical description of Yang-Mills fields and gravity, and it has been suggested, at a heuristic level, that they may also play an important role in a nonperturbative treatment of the quantum theory. The aim of this paper is to provide a mathematical basis for this proposal. The quantum holonomy algebra is constructed, and, in the case of real connections, given the structure of a certain C*-algebra. A proper representation theory is then provided using the Gel'fand spectral theory. A corollary of these general results is a precise formulation of the 'loop transform' proposed by Rovelli and Smolin (1990). Several explicit representations of the holonomy algebra are constructed. The general theory developed here implies that the domain space of quantum states can always be taken to be the space of maximal ideals of the C*-algebra. The structure of this space is investigated and it is shown how observables labelled by 'strips' arise naturally.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The quantum configuration space A / G is a certain completion of A / G [4,5].”
From Quantum theory of geometry: I. Area operators (1997) · cites this paper as [4]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Over the past three years, this approach has been put on a firm mathematical footing through the development of a new functional calculus on the space of gauge equivalent connections [4-11].”
From Quantum theory of geometry: I. Area operators (1997) · cites this paper as [4]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“This calculus does not use any background fields (such as a metric) and is therefore well-suited to a fully nonperturbative treatment.”
From Quantum theory of geometry: I. Area operators (1997) · cites this paper as [4]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“We develop the framework for the Higgs field, in the diffeomorphism invariant context, by pushing the analogy between a usual path holonomy and a 'point holonomy' constructed from a Higgs Field (see below) and can therefore translate step by step the framework [4, 5, 6, 7, 8] developed for gauge fields to arrive at the Higgs field Hilbert space.”
From Kinematical Hilbert spaces for fermionic and Higgs quantum field theories (1998) · cites this paper as [4]
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“In contrast with the usual Minkowskian situation, however, A , G and A / G are all compact spaces in their natural (Gel'fand) topologies [4-8].”
From Quantum theory of geometry: I. Area operators (1997) · cites this paper as [4]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
In the citing paper
“Furthermore, the resulting quantum algebra is precisely the one used in [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14].”
From Quantum theory of geometry: III. Non-commutativity of Riemannian structures (1998) · cites this paper as [3]
In the citing paper
“The Hilbert space in which we will define the operators is constructed from the gauge invariant cylindrical functions on A [6,7,12,19,20].”
From Volume and quantizations (1997) · cites this paper as [6]
In the citing paper
“In [3] such theories were canonically quantized and the representation of the canonical commutation relations that was chosen is generated by the Abelian C ⋆ algebra W of Wilson loop observables via the GNS construction [4].”
From Kinematical Hilbert spaces for fermionic and Higgs quantum field theories (1998) · cites this paper as [4]
In the citing paper
“If one does not work with half densities then it turns out that a) The gravitational connection becomes complex valued. Thus, the gravitational gauge group would become become SL (2 , C) which is non-compact and would make the arsenal of techniques developed in [4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 3] inapplicable.”
From Kinematical Hilbert spaces for fermionic and Higgs quantum field theories (1998) · cites this paper as [4]
In the citing paper
“Assume now that we would define π := i √ det( q ) η to be the momentum conjugate to η . Upon an integration by parts we see that the symplectic structure becomes up to a total time derivative equal to ∫ Σ d 3 x [ π ˙ η + 1 4 πηE i a ˙ E a i ] where E i a denotes the inverse of E a i . But since E a i is the momentum conjugate to A i a this implies that the real-valued gravitational connection A i”
From Kinematical Hilbert spaces for fermionic and Higgs quantum field theories (1998) · cites this paper as [4]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
2 + 1 dimensional gravity as an exactly soluble system
Witten, E. (1988) · Nuclear Physics B · doi:10.1016/0550-3213(88)90143-5 · Cited by 2,562
New Variables for Classical and Quantum Gravity
Ashtekar, A. (1986) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.57.2244 · Cited by 1,663
Self-citationNew Hamiltonian formulation of general relativity
Ashtekar, A. (1987) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.36.1587 · Cited by 1,119
Self-citationLectures on Non-Perturbative Canonical Gravity
Ashtekar, A. (1991) · Advanced Series in Astrophysics and Cosmology · doi:10.1142/1321 · Cited by 872
Self-citationLoop space representation of quantum general relativity
Rovelli, C., & Smolin, L. (1990) · Nuclear Physics B · doi:10.1016/0550-3213(90)90019-a · Cited by 806
Nonperturbative quantum geometries
Jacobson, T., & Smolin, L. (1988) · Nuclear Physics B · doi:10.1016/0550-3213(88)90286-6 · Cited by 283
Ashtekar formulation of general relativity and loop-space nonperturbative quantum gravity: a report
Rovelli, C. (1991) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/8/9/002 · Cited by 221
On the bundle of connections and the gauge orbit manifold in Yang-Mills theory
Mitter, P. K., & Viallet, C.-M. (1981) · Communications in Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1007/bf01209307 · Cited by 203
TOPOLOGICAL AND GLOBAL ASPECTS OF QUANTUM THEORY
Isham, C. J. (1983) · Lectures given at · Cited by 202
Self-citationApplications of Harmonic Analysis
(1964) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2013-0-12221-0 · Cited by 199
Charge-monopole duality and the phases of non-Abelian gauge theories
Mandelstam, S. (1979) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.19.2391 · Cited by 197
Reconstruction of gauge potentials from Wilson loops
Giles, R. (1981) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.24.2160 · Cited by 169
2+1 quantum gravity as a toy model for the 3+1 theory
Ashtekar, A., Husain, V, Rovelli, C., Samuel, J., & Smolin, L. (1989) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/6/10/001 · Cited by 165
Self-citationMeasures on Infinite Dimensional Spaces
Yamasaki, Y. (1985) · Total mean curvature and submanifolds of finite type · doi:10.1142/0162 · Cited by 162
Gauge dynamics in the C-representation
Gambini, R., & Trias, A. (1986) · Nuclear Physics B · doi:10.1016/0550-3213(86)90221-x · Cited by 130
Holonomy and path structures in general relativity and Yang-Mills theory
Barrett, J. W. (1991) · International Journal of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1007/bf00671007 · Cited by 119
Geometrical origin of gauge theories
Gambini, R., & Trias, A. (1981) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.23.553 · Cited by 94
Generalized Functions, Volume 4 : Applications of Harmonic Analysis
Gelfand, I. M., & Vilenkin, N. Y. (1964) · Cited by 85
General covariance, new variables, and dynamics without dynamics
Husain, V., & Kuchař, K. V. (1990) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.42.4070 · Cited by 78
A loop representation for the quantum Maxwell field
Ashtekar, A., & Carlo Rovelli, C. (1992) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/9/5/002 · Cited by 57
Self-citationCertain generalizations of the Weierstrass approximation theorem
Hewitt, E. (1947) · Duke Mathematical Journal · doi:10.1215/s0012-7094-47-01435-x · Cited by 51
A Loop Representation for the Quantum Maxwell Field
Ashtekar, A., & Carlo Rovelli, C. (1992) · CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) · Cited by 38
Self-citationInequivalent observable algebras. Another ambiguity in field quantisation
Ashtekar, A., & Isham, C. J. (1992) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/0370-2693(92)92004-z · Cited by 26
Self-citationA new quantum representation for canonical gravity and SU(2) Yang-Mills theory
Loll, R. (1991) · Nuclear Physics B · doi:10.1016/0550-3213(91)90165-t · Cited by 20
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Kobayashi S, 1954, C. R. Acad. Sci., Paris, 238, 443
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Background independent quantum gravity: a status report
Ashtekar, A., & Lewandowski, J. (2004) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/21/15/r01 · Cited by 1,951
Self-citationLoop quantum cosmology: a status report
Ashtekar, A., & Singh, P. (2011) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/28/21/213001 · Cited by 1,205
Self-citation(1998) · doi:10.12942/lrr-1998-1 · Cited by 917
Quantum theory of geometry: I. Area operators
Ashtekar, A., & Lewandowski, J. (1997) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/14/1a/006 · Cited by 852
Self-citationMathematical structure of loop quantum cosmology
Ashtekar, A., Bojowald, M., & Lewandowski, J. (2003) · Advances in Theoretical and Mathematical Physics · doi:10.4310/atmp.2003.v7.n2.a2 · Cited by 762
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Ashtekar, A., & Isham, C. J.
- Affiliations
- Syracuse University (US)
- ORCID
- Ashtekar, A
- Venue
- Classical and Quantum Gravity
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 1992-06-01
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1433-1467
- ISSN
- 0264-9381 (ISSN-L)
- 1361-6382
- OpenAlex
- W2144505517
- Cited by
- 310
- References
- 24
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 8.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Classical and Quantum Gravity (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Syracuse University
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Mathematical Physics › Advanced Operator Algebra Research
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
- Keywords
- holonomy algebras, C*-algebras, representation theory, non-perturbative quantum gravity, Yang-Mills theory, Yang-Mills fields, maximal ideals, quantum states, loop quantum gravity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
