The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Representations of the holonomy algebras of gravity and nonAbelian gauge theories
Open accessAbstract
Holonomy algebras arise naturally in the classical description of Yang-Mills fields and gravity, and it has been suggested, at a heuristic level, that they may also play an important role in a nonperturbative treatment of the quantum theory. The aim of this paper is to provide a mathematical basis for this proposal. The quantum holonomy algebra is constructed, and, in the case of real connections, given the structure of a certain C*-algebra. A proper representation theory is then provided using the Gel'fand spectral theory. A corollary of these general results is a precise formulation of the 'loop transform' proposed by Rovelli and Smolin (1990). Several explicit representations of the holonomy algebra are constructed. The general theory developed here implies that the domain space of quantum states can always be taken to be the space of maximal ideals of the C*-algebra. The structure of this space is investigated and it is shown how observables labelled by 'strips' arise naturally.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The quantum configuration space A / G is a certain completion of A / G [4,5].”
From Quantum theory of geometry: I. Area operators (1997) · cites this paper as [4]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Over the past three years, this approach has been put on a firm mathematical footing through the development of a new functional calculus on the space of gauge equivalent connections [4-11].”
From Quantum theory of geometry: I. Area operators (1997) · cites this paper as [4]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“This calculus does not use any background fields (such as a metric) and is therefore well-suited to a fully nonperturbative treatment.”
From Quantum theory of geometry: I. Area operators (1997) · cites this paper as [4]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“We develop the framework for the Higgs field, in the diffeomorphism invariant context, by pushing the analogy between a usual path holonomy and a 'point holonomy' constructed from a Higgs Field (see below) and can therefore translate step by step the framework [4, 5, 6, 7, 8] developed for gauge fields to arrive at the Higgs field Hilbert space.”
From Kinematical Hilbert spaces for fermionic and Higgs quantum field theories (1998) · cites this paper as [4]
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“In contrast with the usual Minkowskian situation, however, A , G and A / G are all compact spaces in their natural (Gel'fand) topologies [4-8].”
From Quantum theory of geometry: I. Area operators (1997) · cites this paper as [4]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
In the citing paper
“Furthermore, the resulting quantum algebra is precisely the one used in [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14].”
From Quantum theory of geometry: III. Non-commutativity of Riemannian structures (1998) · cites this paper as [3]
In the citing paper
“The Hilbert space in which we will define the operators is constructed from the gauge invariant cylindrical functions on A [6,7,12,19,20].”
From Volume and quantizations (1997) · cites this paper as [6]
In the citing paper
“In [3] such theories were canonically quantized and the representation of the canonical commutation relations that was chosen is generated by the Abelian C ⋆ algebra W of Wilson loop observables via the GNS construction [4].”
From Kinematical Hilbert spaces for fermionic and Higgs quantum field theories (1998) · cites this paper as [4]
In the citing paper
“If one does not work with half densities then it turns out that a) The gravitational connection becomes complex valued. Thus, the gravitational gauge group would become become SL (2 , C) which is non-compact and would make the arsenal of techniques developed in [4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 3] inapplicable.”
From Kinematical Hilbert spaces for fermionic and Higgs quantum field theories (1998) · cites this paper as [4]
In the citing paper
“Assume now that we would define π := i √ det( q ) η to be the momentum conjugate to η . Upon an integration by parts we see that the symplectic structure becomes up to a total time derivative equal to ∫ Σ d 3 x [ π ˙ η + 1 4 πηE i a ˙ E a i ] where E i a denotes the inverse of E a i . But since E a i is the momentum conjugate to A i a this implies that the real-valued gravitational connection A i”
From Kinematical Hilbert spaces for fermionic and Higgs quantum field theories (1998) · cites this paper as [4]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
2 + 1 dimensional gravity as an exactly soluble system
Witten, E. (1988) · Nuclear Physics B · doi:10.1016/0550-3213(88)90143-5 · Cited by 2,562
New Variables for Classical and Quantum Gravity
Ashtekar, A. (1986) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.57.2244 · Cited by 1,663
Self-citationNew Hamiltonian formulation of general relativity
Ashtekar, A. (1987) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.36.1587 · Cited by 1,119
Self-citationLectures on Non-Perturbative Canonical Gravity
Ashtekar, A. (1991) · Advanced Series in Astrophysics and Cosmology · doi:10.1142/1321 · Cited by 872
Self-citationLoop space representation of quantum general relativity
Rovelli, C., & Smolin, L. (1990) · Nuclear Physics B · doi:10.1016/0550-3213(90)90019-a · Cited by 806
Nonperturbative quantum geometries
Jacobson, T., & Smolin, L. (1988) · Nuclear Physics B · doi:10.1016/0550-3213(88)90286-6 · Cited by 283
Ashtekar formulation of general relativity and loop-space nonperturbative quantum gravity: a report
Rovelli, C. (1991) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/8/9/002 · Cited by 221
On the bundle of connections and the gauge orbit manifold in Yang-Mills theory
Mitter, P. K., & Viallet, C.-M. (1981) · Communications in Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1007/bf01209307 · Cited by 203
TOPOLOGICAL AND GLOBAL ASPECTS OF QUANTUM THEORY
Isham, C. J. (1983) · Lectures given at · Cited by 202
Self-citationApplications of Harmonic Analysis
(1964) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2013-0-12221-0 · Cited by 199
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Kobayashi S, 1954, C. R. Acad. Sci., Paris, 238, 443
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Background independent quantum gravity: a status report
Ashtekar, A., & Lewandowski, J. (2004) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/21/15/r01 · Cited by 1,951
Self-citationLoop quantum cosmology: a status report
Ashtekar, A., & Singh, P. (2011) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/28/21/213001 · Cited by 1,205
Self-citation(1998) · doi:10.12942/lrr-1998-1 · Cited by 917
Quantum theory of geometry: I. Area operators
Ashtekar, A., & Lewandowski, J. (1997) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/14/1a/006 · Cited by 852
Self-citationMathematical structure of loop quantum cosmology
Ashtekar, A., Bojowald, M., & Lewandowski, J. (2003) · Advances in Theoretical and Mathematical Physics · doi:10.4310/atmp.2003.v7.n2.a2 · Cited by 762
Self-citationThiemann, T. (1998) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/15/4/011 · Cited by 750
Quantum geometry of isolated horizons and black hole entropy
Ashtekar, A., Baez, J. C., & Krasnov, K. (2000) · Advances in Theoretical and Mathematical Physics · doi:10.4310/atmp.2000.v4.n1.a1 · Cited by 580
Self-citationQuantization of diffeomorphism invariant theories of connections with local degrees of freedom
Ashtekar, A., Lewandowski, J., Marolf, D., Mourão, J., & Thiemann, T. (1995) · Journal of Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.531252 · Cited by 528
Self-citationRobustness of key features of loop quantum cosmology
Ashtekar, A., Corichi, A., & Singh, P. (2008) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.77.024046 · Cited by 469
Self-citationThiemann, T. (1998) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/15/5/012 · Cited by 416
(1995) · CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) · Cited by 412
Self-citationProjective techniques and functional integration for gauge theories
Ashtekar, A., & Lewandowski, J. (1995) · Journal of Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.531037 · Cited by 388
Self-citation“Sum over surfaces” form of loop quantum gravity
Reisenberger, M. P., & Rovelli, C. (1997) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.56.3490 · Cited by 372
Differential geometry on the space of connections via graphs and projective limits
Ashtekar, A., & Lewandowski, J. (1995) · Journal of Geometry and Physics · doi:10.1016/0393-0440(95)00028-g · Cited by 303
Self-citationUniqueness of Diffeomorphism Invariant States on Holonomy–Flux Algebras
Lewandowski, J., Okołów, A., Sahlmann, H., & Thiemann, T. (2006) · Communications in Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1007/s00220-006-0100-7 · Cited by 297
Carlo Rovelli, C. (2006) · The frontiers collection · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-55420-4_10 · Cited by 504
FUNDAMENTAL STRUCTURE OF LOOP QUANTUM GRAVITY
Han, M., Ma, Y., & HUANG, W. (2007) · International Journal of Modern Physics D · doi:10.1142/s0218271807010894 · Cited by 292
Baez, J. C. (1996) · Advances in Mathematics · doi:10.1006/aima.1996.0012 · Cited by 266
Quantum spin dynamics (QSD): II. The kernel of the Wheeler - DeWitt constraint operator
Thiemann, T. (1998) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/15/4/012 · Cited by 247
The Phoenix Project: master constraint programme for loop quantum gravity
Thiemann, T. (2006) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/23/7/002 · Cited by 272
Gauge field theory coherent states (GCS): II. Peakedness properties
Thiemann, T., & Winkler, O. (2001) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/18/14/301 · Cited by 223
Gauge field theory coherent states (GCS): I. General properties
Thiemann, T. (2001) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/18/11/304 · Cited by 272
Isolated horizons: The classical phase space
Ashtekar, A., Corichi, A., & Krasnov, K. V. (1999) · Advances in Theoretical and Mathematical Physics · doi:10.4310/atmp.1999.v3.n3.a1 · Cited by 209
Self-citationGeometry eigenvalues and the scalar product from recoupling theory in loop quantum gravity
De Pietri, R., & Rovelli, C. (1996) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.54.2664 · Cited by 201
Kinematical Hilbert spaces for fermionic and Higgs quantum field theories
Thiemann, T. (1998) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/15/6/006 · Cited by 184
Representations of the Weyl Algebra in Quantum Geometry
Fleischhack, C. (2009) · Communications in Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1007/s00220-008-0593-3 · Cited by 183
Immirzi parameter in quantum general relativity
Rovelli, C., & Thiemann, T. (1998) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.57.1009 · Cited by 171
Thiemann, T. (1998) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/15/5/010 · Cited by 178
Algebraic quantum gravity (AQG): I. Conceptual setup
Giesel, K., & Thiemann, T. (2007) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/24/10/003 · Cited by 185
Introduction to Loop Quantum Cosmology
Banerjee, K. (2012) · Symmetry Integrability and Geometry Methods and Applications · doi:10.3842/sigma.2012.016 · Cited by 174
A length operator for canonical quantum gravity
Thiemann, T. (1998) · Journal of Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.532445 · Cited by 156
A Length Operator for Canonical Quantum Gravity
Thiemann, T. (1996) · Cited by 151
Algebraic quantum gravity (AQG): IV. Reduced phase space quantization of loop quantum gravity
Giesel, K., & Thiemann, T. (2010) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/27/17/175009 · Cited by 183
Coherent states for canonical quantum general relativity and the infinite tensor product extension
Sahlmann, H., Thiemann, T., & Winkler, O. (2001) · Nuclear Physics B · doi:10.1016/s0550-3213(01)00226-7 · Cited by 168
Gauge Field Theory Coherent States (GCS): I. General Properties
Thiemann, T. (2000) · Cited by 147
Closed formula for the matrix elements of the volume operator in canonical quantum gravity
Thiemann, T. (1998) · Journal of Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.532259 · Cited by 159
On the support of the Ashtekar-Lewandowski measure
Marolf, D., & Mourão, J. M. (1995) · Communications in Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1007/bf02099150 · Cited by 136
Generalized measures in gauge theory
Baez, J. C. (1994) · Letters in Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1007/bf00761713 · Cited by 139
Loop Quantum Gravity: An Inside View
Thiemann, T. (2007) · Lecture notes in physics · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-71117-9_10 · Cited by 153
Gauge field theory coherent states (GCS): III. Ehrenfest theorems
Thiemann, T., & Winkler, O. (2001) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/18/21/315 · Cited by 126
Edge modes of gravity. Part II. Corner metric and Lorentz charges
Freidel, L., Geiller, M., & Pranzetti, D. (2020) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep11(2020)027 · Cited by 157
Quantum theory of geometry: III. Non-commutativity of Riemannian structures
Ashtekar, A., Corichi, A., & Zapata, J. A. (1998) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/15/10/006 · Cited by 129
Self-citationGauge field theory coherent states (GCS): IV. Infinite tensor product and thermodynamical limit
Thiemann, T., & Winkler, O. (2001) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/18/23/302 · Cited by 149
Thiemann, T. (1998) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/15/5/011 · Cited by 128
Volume Operator in Discretized Quantum Gravity
Loll, R. (1995) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.75.3048 · Cited by 124
Coherent States for Canonical Quantum General Relativity and the Infinite Tensor Product ExtensionPreprint
Sahlmann, H., Thiemann, T., & Winkler, O. (2001) · Cited by 133
Complexifier coherent states for quantum general relativity
Thiemann, T. (2006) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/23/6/013 · Cited by 180
Testing the master constraint programme for loop quantum gravity: I. General framework
Dittrich, B., & Thiemann, T. (2006) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/23/4/001 · Cited by 122
SO (4, C )-covariant Ashtekar-Barbero gravity and the Immirzi parameter
Alexandrov, S. (2000) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/17/20/307 · Cited by 112
Lewandowski, J. (1997) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/14/1/010 · Cited by 112
Quantum theory of geometry III: Non-commutativity of Riemannian structuresPreprint
Ashtekar, A., Corichi, R., Zapata, J. A., & México, A. (1998) · Cited by 125
Self-citationThiemann, T. (2001) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/18/17/301 · Cited by 112
Coherent State Transforms for Spaces of Connections
Ashtekar, A., Lewandowski, J., Marolf, D. M., Mourão, J. M., & Thiemann, T. (1996) · Journal of Functional Analysis · doi:10.1006/jfan.1996.0018 · Cited by 115
Self-citationLoop quantization of spherically symmetric midi-superspaces
Campiglia, M., Gambini, R., & Pullin, J. A. (2007) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/24/14/007 · Cited by 96
Gauge field theory coherent states (GCS) III: Ehrenfest theoremsPreprint
Thiemann, T., & Winkler, O. (2001) · Cited by 112
Reality conditions inducing transforms for quantum gauge field theory and quantum gravity
Thiemann, T. (1996) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/13/6/012 · Cited by 102
Complexifier Coherent States for Quantum General Relativity
Thiemann, T. (2006) · Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics · Cited by 100
Quantum spin dynamics: VIII. The master constraint
Thiemann, T. (2006) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/23/7/003 · Cited by 99
Relation between polymer and Fock excitations
Ashtekar, A., & Lewandowski, J. (2001) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/18/18/102 · Cited by 105
Self-citationJones polynomials for intersecting knots as physical states of quantum gravity
Brügmann, B., Gambini, R., & Pullin, J. (1992) · Nuclear Physics B · doi:10.1016/0550-3213(92)90060-o · Cited by 98
Are the spectra of geometrical operators in loop quantum gravity really discrete?
Dittrich, B., & Thiemann, T. (2009) · Journal of Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.3054277 · Cited by 96
Fusion basis for lattice gauge theory and loop quantum gravity
Delcamp, C., Dittrich, B., & Riello, A. (2017) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep02(2017)061 · Cited by 108
Are the spectra of geometrical operators in Loop Quantum Gravity really discrete?
Dittrich, B., & Thiemann, T. (2007) · MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) · Cited by 96
Projector on physical states in loop quantum gravity
Rovelli, C. (1999) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.59.104015 · Cited by 95
The complete spectrum of the area from recoupling theory in loop quantum gravity
Frittelli, S., Lehner, L., & Rovelli, C. (1996) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/13/11/008 · Cited by 95
From the discrete to the continuous: towards a cylindrically consistent dynamics
Dittrich, B. (2012) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/14/12/123004 · Cited by 107
The Continuum Limit of Loop Quantum Gravity: A Framework for Solving the Theory
Dittrich, B. (2017) · WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks · doi:10.1142/9789813220003_0006 · Cited by 128
Spin networks in nonperturbative quantum gravity
Baez, J. C. (1996) · Proceedings of symposia in applied mathematics · doi:10.1090/psapm/051/1372769 · Cited by 92
Loop Quantum Gravity and the Meaning of Diffeomorphism Invariance
Carlo Rovelli, C., & Gaul, M. (2007) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/3-540-46634-7_11 · Cited by 93
Thiemann, T. (1998) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/15/6/005 · Cited by 89
New variables for classical and quantum gravity in all dimensions: I. Hamiltonian analysis
Bodendorfer, N., Thiemann, T., & Thurn, A. (2013) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/30/4/045001 · Cited by 105
The complete spectrum of the area from recoupling theory in loop quantum gravity
Frittelli, S., Lehner, L., & Carlo Rovelli, C. (1996) · CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) · Cited by 82
A new vacuum for loop quantum gravity
Dittrich, B., & Geiller, M. (2015) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/32/11/112001 · Cited by 96
Parallel Transport and FunctorsPreprint
Schreiber, U., & Waldorf, K. (2007) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.0705.0452 · Cited by 80
Loop constraints: A habitat and their algebra
Lewandowski, J., & Marolf, D. (1998) · MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) · Cited by 79
Time evolution as refining, coarse graining and entangling
Dittrich, B., & Steinhaus, S. (2014) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/16/12/123041 · Cited by 82
Consistency check on volume and triad operator quantization in loop quantum gravity: II
Giesel, K., & Thiemann, T. (2006) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/23/18/012 · Cited by 84
Reality conditions inducing transforms for quantum gauge field theory and quantum gravityPreprint
Thiemann, T., & Cgpg, P. (1995) · Cited by 80
LOOP CONSTRAINTS: A HABITAT AND THEIR ALGEBRA
LEWANDOWSKI, J., & MAROLF, D. (1998) · International Journal of Modern Physics D · doi:10.1142/s0218271898000231 · Cited by 76
Loop quantum gravity, exact holographic mapping, and holographic entanglement entropy
Han, M., & Hung, L.-Y. (2017) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.95.024011 · Cited by 82
Fock representations from U(1) holonomy algebras
Varadarajan, M. (2000) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.61.104001 · Cited by 74
On (cosmological) singularity avoidance in loop quantum gravity
Brunnemann, J., & Thiemann, T. (2006) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/23/5/001 · Cited by 80
New variables for classical and quantum gravity in all dimensions: III. Quantum theory
Bodendorfer, N., Thiemann, T., & Thurn, A. (2013) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/30/4/045003 · Cited by 81
Photons from quantized electric flux representations
Varadarajan, M. (2001) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.64.104003 · Cited by 81
A generally covariant quantum field theory and a prediction on quantum measurements of geometry
Rovelli, C. (1993) · Nuclear Physics B · doi:10.1016/0550-3213(93)90567-9 · Cited by 66
New variables for classical and quantum gravity in all dimensions: II. Lagrangian analysis
Bodendorfer, N., Thiemann, T., & Thurn, A. (2013) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/30/4/045002 · Cited by 85
Area spectrum in Lorentz covariant loop gravity
Alexandrov, S., & Vassilevich, D. (2001) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.64.044023 · Cited by 68
Towards a phase diagram for spin foams
Delcamp, C., & Dittrich, B. (2017) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/1361-6382/aa8f24 · Cited by 76
Functional Integration on Spaces of Connections
Baez, J. C., & Sawin, S. (1997) · Journal of Functional Analysis · doi:10.1006/jfan.1997.3108 · Cited by 69
Strings, loops and others: a critical survey of the present approaches to quantum gravityPreprint
Carlo Rovelli, C. (1998) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.gr-qc/9803024 · Cited by 120
Operators for quantized directions
Major, S. (1999) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/16/12/307 · Cited by 71
Quantum Spin Dynamics VIII. The Master ConstraintPreprint
Thiemann, T. (2006) · Cited by 77
Hypercuboidal renormalization in spin foam quantum gravity
Bähr, B., & Steinhaus, S. (2017) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.95.126006 · Cited by 69
New length operator for loop quantum gravity
Ma, Y., Soo, C., & Yang, J. (2010) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.81.124026 · Cited by 66
Quantum gravity kinematics from extended TQFTs
Dittrich, B., & Geiller, M. (2016) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/aa54e2 · Cited by 69
Consistency check on volume and triad operator quantization in loop quantum gravity: I
Giesel, K., & Thiemann, T. (2006) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/23/18/011 · Cited by 75
Diffeomorphism covariant representations of the holonomy-flux -algebra
Oko w, A., & Lewandowski, J. (2003) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/20/16/302 · Cited by 58
On entanglement entropy in non-Abelian lattice gauge theory and 3D quantum gravity
Delcamp, C., Dittrich, B., & Riello, A. (2016) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep11(2016)102 · Cited by 57
Matrix elements of Thiemann's Hamiltonian constraint in loop quantum gravity
Borissov, R., Pietri, R. D., & Carlo Rovelli, C. (1997) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/14/10/008 · Cited by 66
The quantum configuration space of loop quantum cosmology
Velhinho, J. M. (2007) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/24/14/013 · Cited by 58
Metadata
- Authors
- Ashtekar, A., & Isham, C. J.
- Affiliations
- Syracuse University (US)
- ORCID
- Ashtekar, A
- Venue
- Classical and Quantum Gravity
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 1992-06-01
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1433-1467
- ISSN
- 0264-9381 (ISSN-L)
- 1361-6382
- OpenAlex
- W2144505517
- Cited by
- 310
- References
- 24
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 8.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Classical and Quantum Gravity (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Syracuse University
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Mathematical Physics › Advanced Operator Algebra Research
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
- Keywords
- holonomy algebras, C*-algebras, representation theory, non-perturbative quantum gravity, Yang-Mills theory, Yang-Mills fields, maximal ideals, quantum states, loop quantum gravity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
