Cited by 55Surface Roughness and Optical MeasurementsTerahertz technology and applicationsIndustrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection

Optical and terahertz measurement techniques for flat-faced pharmaceutical tablets: a case study of gloss, surface roughness and bulk properties of starch acetate tablets

Open access
Juuti, M, Tuononen, H, Prykäri, T, Kontturi, V, Kuosmanen, M, Alarousu, E, Ketolainen, J, Myllylä, R +1 more·2009·Measurement Science and Technology

Abstract

Surface and bulk properties of flat-faced starch acetate tablets were studied.For surface quality inspection optical coherence tomography and recently developed diffractive glossmeter were utilized.Both these optical devices together provide local information on surface roughness and gloss of a tablet over a measured area.The concepts of mean topography and mean gloss profile for surface quality of a tablet are introduced.It was observed that the surface quality of the tablet varies, and compression at high pressure may not guarantee a good surface quality of the tablet.Using novel statistical parameters for gloss and relevant surface roughness parameter, it is possible to get more comprehensive quantitative data on the surface condition of a tablet.THz spectrometer was utilized for detection of THz pulse delay in transmission measurement mode from the tablets.The delay time and thickness ratio of the tablet are consistent with the porosity of the tablet as a function of compression pressure.We suggest that the multimeasurement scheme using three different devices helps tablet makers to better assess bulk and surface quality of their products.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0957-0233/20/1/015301

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is a linear correlation between the bulk refractive index and the porosity of pharmaceutical tablets.

    “The work demonstrated that there is a linear correlation between the bulk refractive index and the porosity of pharmaceutical tablets, which can be exploited through the so-called zero-porosity approximation (ZPA) as a method for measuring tablet porosity.”

    From Terahertz-Based Porosity Measurement of Pharmaceutical Tablets: a Tutorial (2020) · cites this paper as [35]

    The Introduction says the refractive index correlates with tablet porosity, and the Results report that refractive index increases as porosity decreases. Neither passage establishes that the relationship is linear, and the paper does not describe the zero-porosity approximation (ZPA) as a method for measuring porosity. The study examined starch acetate tablets; page numbers were unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The linear correlation between bulk refractive index and porosity can be exploited through the zero-porosity approximation (ZPA) as a method for measuring tablet porosity.

    “The work demonstrated that there is a linear correlation between the bulk refractive index and the porosity of pharmaceutical tablets, which can be exploited through the so-called zero-porosity approximation (ZPA) as a method for measuring tablet porosity.”

    From Terahertz-Based Porosity Measurement of Pharmaceutical Tablets: a Tutorial (2020) · cites this paper as [35]

    The Results (page unavailable) say that effective refractive index rises as tablet porosity falls, and the Conclusions say a THz pulse can monitor porosity. The paper does not describe the zero-porosity approximation (ZPA) or establish a linear refractive-index–porosity relationship, so those specific parts of the claim are unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Silvennoinen R, Peiponen K-E and Myller K 2008 Specular Gloss (Oxford: Elsevier)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Juuti, M., Tuononen, H., Prykäri, T., Kontturi, V, Kuosmanen, M., Alarousu, E., Ketolainen, J., Myllylä, R., & Peiponen, K.-E.
Affiliations
  • VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland (FI)
  • University of Eastern Finland (FI)
  • University of Oulu (FI)
Venue
Measurement Science and Technology
Published
2008-11-12
Volume
20
Issue
1
Pages
015301
ISSN
  • 0957-0233 (ISSN-L)
  • 1361-6501
OpenAlex
W2094215041
Cited by
55
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Measurement Science and Technology (publishedVersion)
Funders
Academy of Finland
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Surface Roughness and Optical Measurements
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Terahertz technology and applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
Keywords
tablets, starch acetate, surface roughness, optical coherence tomography, terahertz spectroscopy, tablet porosity, compression pressure, surface quality inspection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review