Cited by 70Terahertz technology and applicationsPharmaceutical Quality and CounterfeitingAnalytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals

Detection of porosity of pharmaceutical compacts by terahertz radiation transmission and light reflection measurement techniques

Bawuah, Prince, Pierotic Mendia, Alessandra, Silfsten, Pertti, Pääkkönen, Pertti, Ervasti, Tuomas, Ketolainen, Jarkko, Zeitler, J. Axel, Peiponen, Kai-Erik·2014·International Journal of Pharmaceutics

Abstract

We report on the non-destructive quantification of the porosity of pharmaceutical compacts (microcrystalline cellulose tablets) by using both optical and terahertz techniques. For the full analysis of the porosity of pharmaceutical tablets, the results obtained in both cases have shown that optical and terahertz techniques are complementary. The intrinsic refractive index of microcrystalline cellulose was estimated using the effective refractive index obtained from the time delay of the THz pulse together with the Bruggeman model for effective media. Once this intrinsic refractive index is known, the unknown porosity of the tablet can be estimated with the aid of the measured effective refractive index as well as the thickness of the pharmaceutical tablet. The method was tested using a set of thirteen tablets having different porosities. It is shown that the error in the estimation of the unknown tablet's porosity is less than 1%. In addition, surface roughness was measured by using an optical interferometer and gloss by using a diffractive-optical-element based glossmeter. The measurement was achieved by scanning the tablets with a probe beam and detecting the reflected light. The surface roughness and gloss data show relatively good correlation with the porosities of the tablets.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2014.02.011

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • THz-TDS in conjunction with the Bruggeman effective medium approximation can be used to nondestructively and non-invasively measure the porosity of pharmaceutical tablets.

    “Around the mid 2010s, Bawuah et al. [40] successfully demonstrated that THz-TDS in conjunction with the Bruggeman effective medium approximation can be used to nondestructively and non-invasively measure the porosity of pharmaceutical tablets.”
  • The Bruggeman model could be used to accurately measure the porosity of flat-faced compacts containing only microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) and air, despite its basic assumption that the inclusions are of spherical shape.

    “Despite its basic assumption that the inclusions are of spherical shape, the Bruggeman model could be used to accurately measure the porosity of flat-faced compacts containing only microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) and air [40].”
  • The Bruggeman model is valid for tablets with a wide range of porosity.

    “In that preliminary study, the authors adopted the Bruggeman model due to its validity for tablets with a wide range of porosity.”
  • Total porosity can be calculated from a THz-TDS measurement by using effective medium theory and knowing the intrinsic refractive index of the solid matrix.

    “The total porosity can thus be calculated from a THz-TDS measurement by utilizing effective medium theory and knowing the intrinsic refractive index of the solid matrix.”
  • THz-TDS has been demonstrated to measure porosity of rocks and pharmaceutical tablets and to analyze anisotropy of pore structures.

    “This method has been demonstrated to measure the porosity of rocks [20] and pharmaceutical tablets [21,22,23] as well as to analyze the anisotropy of pore structures [18,24].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bawuah, P., Pierotic Mendia, A., Silfsten, P., Pääkkönen, P., Ervasti, T., Ketolainen, J., Zeitler, J. A., & Peiponen, K.-E.
Affiliations
  • University of Eastern Finland (FI)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
Bawuah, Prince
Venue
International Journal of Pharmaceutics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-04
Volume
465
Issue
1-2
Pages
70-76
ISSN
0378-5173 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2016076718
Cited by
70
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 1
FWCI
4.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Pharmaceutics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Terahertz technology and applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Pharmaceutical Quality and Counterfeiting
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals
Keywords
tablet porosity, microcrystalline cellulose, refractive index, surface roughness, glosses
MeSH terms
Cellulose, Surface Properties, Tablets, Technology, Pharmaceutical, Porosity, Terahertz Radiation, Terahertz Spectroscopy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review