The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mimicking the nanofeatures of bone increases bone-forming cell adhesion and proliferation
Abstract
There is a great need to design better orthopaedic implant devices by modifying their surface properties. In this respect, one approach that has received much attention of late is the simulation of the surface roughness of bone in synthetic orthopaedic implant materials. Bone has numerous nanometre features due to the presence of nanostructured entities such as collagen and hydroxyapatite. Despite this fact, current orthopaedic implant materials are smooth at the nanoscale. Previous studies have measured increased osteoblast (bone-forming cell) functions on biologically inspired nanophase titania compared to conventional titania formulations. In fact, in vitro calcium deposition by osteoblasts was up to three times higher on nanostructured compared to conventional titania. However, it was unclear in those studies what underlying surface properties (roughness, crystallinity, crystal phase, chemistry, etc) promoted enhanced functions of osteoblasts on nanophase titania. For that reason, the objective of the present in vitro study was to specifically determine the role nanostructured surface roughness of titania had on increasing functions of osteoblasts. To achieve this, the surface roughness of nanophase and conventional titania was transferred to a model tissue engineering polymer: poly-lactic- co -glycolic acid (PLGA). Results of the present study demonstrated greater osteoblast adhesion and proliferation for up to 5 days of culture on PLGA moulds of nanophase compared to conventional titania. In this manner, this study elucidated that the property of nanophase titania which increased osteoblast function was a large degree of nanometre surface features that mimicked bone. For this reason, nanophase materials deserve more attention in improving orthopaedic implant applications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Wan, Y., Wang, Y., Liu, Z., Qu, X., Han, B., Bei, J., & Wang, S. (2005) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.11.016 · Cited by 342
Cited by
Review on titanium and titanium based alloys as biomaterials for orthopaedic applications
Kaur, M., & Singh, K. (2019) · Materials Science and Engineering: C · doi:10.1016/j.msec.2019.04.064 · Cited by 1,451
Advancing dental implant surface technology – From micron- to nanotopography
Mendonça, G., Mendonça, D. B. S., Aragão, F. J. L., & Cooper, L. F. (2008) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.05.012 · Cited by 990
Gittens, R. A., McLachlan, T., Olivares-Navarrete, R., Cai, Y., Berner, S., Tannenbaum, R., Schwartz, Z., Sandhage, K. H., & Boyan, B. D. (2011) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.01.029 · Cited by 827
Liberio, M. S., Sadowski, M. C., Soekmadji, C., Davis, R. A., & Nelson, C. C. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0112122 · Cited by 85
Hansen, J. C., Yul Lim, J., Xu, L.-C., Siedlecki, C. A., Mauger, D. T., & Donahue, H. J. (2007) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2007.03.018 · Cited by 80
Metadata
- Authors
- Palin, E., Liu, H., & Webster, T. J.
- Venue
- Nanotechnology
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2005-07-18
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1828-1835
- ISSN
- 0957-4484 (ISSN-L)
- 1361-6528
- OpenAlex
- W2030550786
- Cited by
- 211
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mimicking the nanofeatures of bone increases bone-forming cell adhesion and proliferation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0957-4484/16/9/069
- The paper
- Palin, E., Liu, H., & Webster, T. J. (2005). Mimicking the nanofeatures of bone increases bone-forming cell adhesion and proliferation. Nanotechnology. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/16/9/069
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.