Cited by 123Non-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringECG Monitoring and AnalysisHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control

Photoplethysmogram signal quality estimation using repeated Gaussian filters and cross-correlation

Karlen, W, Kobayashi, K, Ansermino, J M, Dumont, G A·2012·Physiological Measurement

Abstract

Pulse oximeters are monitors that noninvasively measure heart rate and blood oxygen saturation (SpO2). Unfortunately, pulse oximetry is prone to artifacts which negatively impact the accuracy of the measurement and can cause a significant number of false alarms. We have developed an algorithm to segment pulse oximetry signals into pulses and estimate the signal quality in real time. The algorithm iteratively calculates a signal quality index (SQI) ranging from 0 to 100. In the presence of artifacts and irregular signal morphology, the algorithm outputs a low SQI number. The pulse segmentation algorithm uses the derivative of the signal to find pulse slopes and an adaptive set of repeated Gaussian filters to select the correct slopes. Cross-correlation of consecutive pulse segments is used to estimate signal quality. Experimental results using two different benchmark data sets showed a good pulse detection rate with a sensitivity of 96.21% and a positive predictive value of 99.22%, which was equivalent to the available reference algorithm. The novel SQI algorithm was effective and produced significantly lower SQI values in the presence of artifacts compared to SQI values during clean signals. The SQI algorithm may help to guide untrained pulse oximeter users and also help in the design of advanced algorithms for generating smart alarms.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0967-3334/33/10/1617

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Karlen, W., Kobayashi, K., Ansermino, J. M., & Dumont, G. A.
Affiliations
University of British Columbia (CA)
Corresponding author
Karlen, W
Venue
Physiological Measurement
Published
2012-09-18
Volume
33
Issue
10
Pages
1617-1629
ISSN
  • 0967-3334 (ISSN-L)
  • 1361-6579
OpenAlex
W2160347936
Cited by
123
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3
FWCI
2.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Physiological Measurement (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Hirosaki University
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › ECG Monitoring and Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Keywords
photoplethysmogram, pulse oximetry, signal quality estimation, pulse detection, Gaussian filtering, cross correlation function, signal artifacts, real-time monitoring, smart alarms, heart rate monitoring
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Algorithms, Child, Child, Preschool, Humans, Infant, Middle Aged, Quality Control, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Normal Distribution, Databases, Factual, Photoplethysmography, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review