CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 17

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Harper–Hofstadter Hamiltonian and conical diffraction in photonic lattices with grating assisted tunneling

Dubček, Tena, Lelas, Karlo, Jukić, Dario, Pezer, Robert, Soljačić, Marin, Buljan, Hrvoje·2015·New Journal of Physics
DOI 10.1088/1367-2630/17/12/125002
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1367-2630/17/12/125002

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

FIG. 1 (color online) Illustration of the grating assisted tunneling scheme. (a) Sketch of the spatial dependence of the index of refraction δn L ( x, z ) = δn L + δn T + δn G , which creates a synthetic magnetic field in a photonic lattice. A 1D photonic lattice [ δn L = δn L 0 cos 2 ( πx/a )] is superimposed with a linear gradient index in the x direction ( δn T = -ηx , orange dotted line), and an additional small grating potential [ δn G = δn G 0 cos 2 (( q x x -κz ) / 2)], at a small angle ( θ is on the order of 1 ◦ ) with respect to the z axis. In the xz plane we plot the projection of δn L (blue bold lines), and the grating (green dashed lines). (b) A discrete lattice with complex tunneling matrix elements between sites, K x e iφ m , and spatially dependent phases φ m , can model the system in (a). (c) A particular choice of θ (see text), yields a lattice with φ m = πm , and a dispersion with a 1D Dirac cone at k x = 0. (d) The amplitude of the tunneling K x as a function of the strength of the grating δn G 0 (green squares). The tunneling amplitude J x versus δn G 0 for a system without the tilt. (e,f,g) Numerical simulation of the evolution of a wavepacket that initially excites modes close to k x = 0 in the continuous 1D photonic lattice. (e) Diffraction in a periodic photonic lattice δn L . (f) Propagation in the tilted system, δn L + δn T , shows that the tunneling (diffraction) is suppressed. (g) The tunneling is restored by an additional grating potential with q x = π/a . (h) Propagation of the wavepacket in the corresponding discrete model illustrated in (c).
FIG. 1 (color online) Illustration of the grating assisted tunneling scheme. (a) Sketch of the spatial dependence of the index of refraction δn L ( x, z ) = δn L + δn T + δn G , which creates a synthetic magnetic field in a photonic lattice. A 1D photonic lattice [ δn L = δn L 0 cos 2 ( πx/a )] is superimposed with a linear gradient index in the x direction ( δn T = -ηx , orange dotted line), and an additional small grating potential [ δn G = δn G 0 cos 2 (( q x x -κz ) / 2)], at a small angle ( θ is on the order of 1 ◦ ) with respect to the z axis. In the xz plane we plot the projection of δn L (blue bold lines), and the grating (green dashed lines). (b) A discrete lattice with complex tunneling matrix elements between sites, K x e iφ m , and spatially dependent phases φ m , can model the system in (a). (c) A particular choice of θ (see text), yields a lattice with φ m = πm , and a dispersion with a 1D Dirac cone at k x = 0. (d) The amplitude of the tunneling K x as a function of the strength of the grating δn G 0 (green squares). The tunneling amplitude J x versus δn G 0 for a system without the tilt. (e,f,g) Numerical simulation of the evolution of a wavepacket that initially excites modes close to k x = 0 in the continuous 1D photonic lattice. (e) Diffraction in a periodic photonic lattice δn L . (f) Propagation in the tilted system, δn L + δn T , shows that the tunneling (diffraction) is suppressed. (g) The tunneling is restored by an additional grating potential with q x = π/a . (h) Propagation of the wavepacket in the corresponding discrete model illustrated in (c).CC-BY · From the PDF
FIG. 2 (color online) Grating assisted tunneling and conical diffraction in a square photonic lattice. (a) Sketch of the 2D lattice with grating assisted tunneling along the x direction. The resulting nontrivial hopping phases π and 0 are denoted with dashed and solid lines, respectively. A wavepacket that makes one loop around the plaquette accumulates the phase π . (b) The lattice possesses two 2D Dirac cones at ( k x , k y ) = (0 , ± π/ 2 a ) in the dispersion β ( k x , k y ), where β is the propagation constant. (c) Intensity of a beam, which initially excites modes in the vicinity of the Dirac points, after propagation for z = 162 mm. The intensity has two concentric rings corresponding to the conical diffraction pattern. (d) Simulation of the diffraction pattern in the discrete model corresponding to the lattice in (a), which also exhibits conical diffraction (see text for details).
FIG. 2 (color online) Grating assisted tunneling and conical diffraction in a square photonic lattice. (a) Sketch of the 2D lattice with grating assisted tunneling along the x direction. The resulting nontrivial hopping phases π and 0 are denoted with dashed and solid lines, respectively. A wavepacket that makes one loop around the plaquette accumulates the phase π . (b) The lattice possesses two 2D Dirac cones at ( k x , k y ) = (0 , ± π/ 2 a ) in the dispersion β ( k x , k y ), where β is the propagation constant. (c) Intensity of a beam, which initially excites modes in the vicinity of the Dirac points, after propagation for z = 162 mm. The intensity has two concentric rings corresponding to the conical diffraction pattern. (d) Simulation of the diffraction pattern in the discrete model corresponding to the lattice in (a), which also exhibits conical diffraction (see text for details).CC-BY · From the PDF

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 12 references

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.013904 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1103/PhysRevA.78.033834 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1038/nature08293 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1038/nature12066 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1038/nphoton.2013.274 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1038/nphys2063 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1038/nphoton.2012.236 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.023602 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Manela O, 2010, New J. Phys., 12, 10.1088/1367-2630/12/5/053017 · DOI
  10. 10.1038/nmat3520 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1038/nphoton.2013.42 · DOI
  12. Mukherjee S, 2015, New J. Phys., 17
  13. 10.1038/nphoton.2014.248 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1103/RevModPhys.83.1523 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Goldman N, 2014, Rep. Prog. Phys., 77, 10.1088/0034-4885/77/12/126401 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1103/RevModPhys.82.3045 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1103/PhysRevE.66.046602 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1364/OL.28.000710 · DOI
  19. 10.1364/OPEX.13.001780 · DOI
  20. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.153901 · DOI
  21. Berry M V, 2004, J. Opt. A. Pure Appl. Opt., 6, 289, 10.1088/1464-4258/6/4/001 · DOI
  22. Harper P G, 1955, Proc. Phys. Soc. London, 68, 874, 10.1088/0370-1298/68/10/304 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1103/PhysRevB.14.2239 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.255301 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.185302 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.185301 · DOI
  27. Kolovsky A R, 2011, Europhys. Lett., 93, 003, 10.1209/0295-5075/93/20003 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.806 · DOI
  29. 10.1126/science.1060182 · DOI
  30. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.225304 · DOI
  31. 10.1038/nphys3171 · DOI
  32. 10.1103/PhysRevA.86.033615 · DOI
  33. 10.1364/OL.32.000154 · DOI
  34. 10.1103/PhysRevA.87.013814 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Dubček, T., Lelas, K., Jukić, D., Pezer, R., Soljačić, M., & Buljan, H.
Venue
New Journal of Physics
Publisher
IOP Publishing
Published
2015-12-07
Volume
17
Issue
12
Pages
125002
ISSN
1367-2630
DOI
10.1088/1367-2630/17/12/125002
Cited by
17
References
12
Licence
Funders
  • U.S. Army Research Laboratory (W911NF-13-D-0001)
  • Unity through Knowledge Fund (5/13)
  • U.S. DOE (DE-SC0001299 / DE-FG02-09ER46577)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review