Cited by 775Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein CondensatesAdvanced Condensed Matter PhysicsQuantum Mechanics and Non-Hermitian Physics

Experimental Realization of Strong Effective Magnetic Fields in an Optical Lattice

Open access
Aidelsburger, M., Atala, M., Nascimbène, S., Trotzky, S., Chen, Y.-A., Bloch, I.·2011·Physical Review Letters

Abstract

We use Raman-assisted tunneling in an optical superlattice to generate large tunable effective magnetic fields for ultracold atoms. When hopping in the lattice, the accumulated phase shift by an atom is equivalent to the Aharonov-Bohm phase of a charged particle exposed to a staggered magnetic field of large magnitude, on the order of 1 flux quantum per plaquette. We study the ground state of this system and observe that the frustration induced by the magnetic field can lead to a degenerate ground state for noninteracting particles. We provide a measurement of the local phase acquired from Raman-induced tunneling, demonstrating time-reversal symmetry breaking of the underlying Hamiltonian. Furthermore, the quantum cyclotron orbit of single atoms in the lattice exposed to the magnetic field is directly revealed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.107.255301

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Control over the sign can be acquired by dynamical modulation of the lattice, Raman-assisted tunneling or embedding defects in infinite arrays.

    “Control over this sign can be acquired by dynamical modulation of the lattice [16-21], Raman-assisted tunneling [22, 23] or embedding defects in infinite arrays [24].”

    From Universal Sign Control of Coupling in Tight-Binding Lattices (2016) · cites this paper as [23]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aidelsburger, M., Atala, M., Nascimbène, S., Trotzky, S., Chen, Y.-A., & Bloch, I.
Affiliations
  • Max Planck Institute of Quantum Optics (DE)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
2011-12-12
Volume
107
Issue
25
Pages
255301-255301
ISSN
  • 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1079-7114
OpenAlex
W2012813559
Cited by
775
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 29 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 55 · 2019: 46 · 2018: 55 · 2017: 51 · 2016: 64 · 2015: 77 · 2014: 79 · 2013: 83 · 2012: 58
FWCI
38.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Condensed Matter Physics › Advanced Condensed Matter Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Non-Hermitian Physics
Keywords
effective magnetic field, optical superlattice, ultracold atoms, Aharonov-Bohm phase, staggered magnetic field, ground state degeneracy, time-reversal symmetry breaking, flux quantum

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review