Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 657

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 63 of the 63 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The quantum technologies roadmap: a European community view

Open access
Acín, Antonio, Bloch, Immanuel, Buhrman, Harry, Calarco, Tommaso, Eichler, Christopher, Eisert, Jens, Esteve, Daniel, Gisin, Nicolas, Glaser, Steffen J, Jelezko, Fedor, Kuhr, Stefan, Lewenstein, Maciej, Riedel, Max F, Schmidt, Piet O, Thew, Rob, Wallraff, Andreas, Walmsley, Ian, Wilhelm, Frank K·2018·New Journal of Physics
DOI 10.1088/1367-2630/aad1ea
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Within the last two decades, quantum technologies (QT) have made tremendous progress, moving from Nobel Prize award-winning experiments on quantum physics (1997: Chu, Cohen-Tanoudji, Phillips; 2001: Cornell, Ketterle, Wieman; 2005: Hall, Hänsch-, Glauber; 2012: Haroche, Wineland) into a cross-disciplinary field of applied research. Technologies are being developed now that explicitly address individual quantum states and make use of the 'strange' quantum properties, such as superposition and entanglement. The field comprises four domains: quantum communication, where individual or entangled photons are used to transmit data in a provably secure way; quantum simulation, where well-controlled quantum systems are used to reproduce the behaviour of other, less accessible quantum systems; quantum computation, which employs quantum effects to dramatically speed up certain calculations, such as number factoring; and quantum sensing and metrology, where the high sensitivity of coherent quantum systems to external perturbations is exploited to enhance the performance of measurements of physical quantities. In Europe, the QT community has profited from several EC funded coordination projects, which, among other things, have coordinated the creation of a 150-page QT Roadmap ( http://qurope.eu/h2020/qtflagship/roadmap2016 ). This article presents an updated summary of this roadmap.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1367-2630/aad1ea

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 63 references

Cited by

See all 657

Metadata

Authors
Acín, A., Bloch, I., Buhrman, H., Calarco, T., Eichler, C., Eisert, J., Esteve, D., Gisin, N., Glaser, S. J., Jelezko, F., Kuhr, S., Lewenstein, M., Riedel, M. F., Schmidt, P. O., Thew, R., Wallraff, A., Walmsley, I., & Wilhelm, F. K.
Venue
New Journal of Physics
Publisher
IOP Publishing
Published
2018-08-15
Volume
20
Issue
8
Pages
080201
ISSN
1367-2630 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1088/1367-2630/aad1ea
OpenAlex
W2775516909
Cited by
657
References
63
FWCI
33.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The quantum technologies roadmap: a European community view. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/1367-2630/aad1ea
The paper
Acín, A., Bloch, I., Buhrman, H., Calarco, T., Eichler, C., Eisert, J., Esteve, D., Gisin, N., Glaser, S. J., Jelezko, F., Kuhr, S., Lewenstein, M., Riedel, M. F., Schmidt, P. O., Thew, R., Wallraff, A., Walmsley, I., & Wilhelm, F. K. (2018). The quantum technologies roadmap: a European community view. New Journal of Physics. https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/aad1ea

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.