Cited by 158Cosmology and Gravitation TheoriesNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesBlack Holes and Theoretical Physics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 91 of the 91 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 11 of the 40 sources its claims cite were checked for support.

Creation of a compact topologically nontrivial inflationary universe

Open access
Linde, Andrei·2004·Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics

Abstract

If inflation can occur only at the energy density V much smaller than the Planck density, which is the case for many inflationary models based on string theory, then the probability of quantum creation of a closed or an infinitely large open inflationary universe is exponentially suppressed for all known choices of the wavefunction of the universe. Meanwhile under certain conditions there is no exponential suppression for creation of topologically nontrivial compact flat or open inflationary universes. This suggests, contrary to the standard textbook lore, that compact flat or open universes with nontrivial topology should be considered a rule rather than an exception.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

For low-scale inflation with \(V \ll 1\) in Planck units, quantum creation of a closed or infinite open inflationary universe is exponentially suppressed. Linde argues that compact flat or open universes with nontrivial topology can instead be created without such exponential suppression, so they may be the rule rather than the exception.

Key findings

  • Standard closed or infinite open creation is suppressed by \(P \sim \exp(-24\pi^2/V)\); for \(V \sim 10^{-12}\), the suppression is \(10^{-10^{14}}\). A radiation-dominated closed universe must have initial entropy \(S \sim V^{-3/4}\), e.g. \(S > 10^9\) for \(V < 10^{-12}\), with probability \(\exp(-S) \sim \exp(-V^{-3/4}) < e^{-10^9}\).
  • In a compact flat toroidal universe, an initial Planckian size \(O(1)\) with radiation domination gives total entropy \(O(1)\); chaotic mixing homogenizes the universe, and inflation begins at \(a \sim V^{-1/4}\), which is smaller than the de Sitter horizon \(H^{-1} \sim V^{-1/2}\). The probability of creating the initial \(O(1)\) patch is not exponentially suppressed and practically does not depend on \(V(\phi)\).
  • The Wheeler-DeWitt equation for the flat toroidal de Sitter universe has no potential barrier, unlike the closed case. The WKB approximation breaks down at \(a \lesssim V^{-1/6}\), and classical space-time description begins at \(a \gtrsim V^{-1/6}\); the action in the quantum regime is \(O(1)\), so there is no tunneling suppression.
  • Including scalar kinetic energy \(K\), for \(48K < 1\) the wave function is non-oscillatory and vanishes as \(a \to 0\); for \(48K > 1\) it is oscillatory. For compact flat or open universes with \(K \gg 1/48\), incident waves are adiabatically transformed without reflection, confirming no exponential suppression.

Methods

  • Theoretical quantum cosmology analysis using the Wheeler-DeWitt equation for closed, flat toroidal, and compact open universes, comparing tunneling barriers and wave-function behavior.
  • Uses chaotic mixing arguments for compact universes and estimates of entropy, radiation density, and scale factor at inflation onset; includes the scalar-field kinetic energy term \(K\) and reports numerical verification for \(K \gg 1/48\).
  • No observational data are used; the paper is an analytic and numerical theoretical study.

Limitations

  • The paper states that there is still no compelling observational evidence for nontrivial topology, and inflation typically makes the universe too large to observe its topology unless the number of e-folds and scalar potential are fine-tuned.
  • The paper states that it ignores the Casimir effect, which is suppressed by supersymmetry but may be negative under certain conditions and could forbid classical evolution at \(a < O(H^{-1})\); adding matter leads to a curvature singularity, so kinetic energy of the scalar field must be included.
  • The paper states that eternal inflation may make initial conditions irrelevant, but probability measures in eternal inflation are delicate, and many inflationary models do not lead to eternal inflation. Evident from the text: the conclusions rely on assumptions such as Planckian initial size, radiation domination, a flat inflationary potential, and specific compact topology, with no observational test proposed.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1475-7516/2004/10/004

Cites

91 of 91 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

29 Own interpretation · 19 No basis given · 10 Not checked yet · 6 No full text of the sources · 4 Couldn’t confirm · 2 Partly supported · 2 Sources not found · 2 Own result · accuracy not yet measured

Verify all 10 references — free account
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 30
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 4
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
34 of 34
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    At the Planck time the universe was radiation dominated, with V << T^4 = O(1).

    “Let us assume, as we did in the beginning of the previous section, that at the Planck time t p ∼ M -1 p = 1 the universe was radiation dominated, V ≪ T 4 = O(1).”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    At the Planck time the total size of the box was Planckian, a(tp)=O(1).

    “Let us also assume that at the Planck time the total size of the box was Planckian, a(t p ) = O(1).”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The inflaton potential V(φ) is constant during the derivation of the Wheeler-DeWitt equation.

    “we temporarily ignored the evolution of the scalar fields (we will discuss it later, see Eqs. (8), ( 9)), and assumed that V (φ) = const, which is a good approximation in inflationary cosmology if the potential V is sufficiently flat.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The scalar field φ is constant for the derivation.

    “Let us assume for a moment that φ is constant (see below).”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The standard description of the universe in terms of classical space-time becomes possible only below the Planck density M^4_p=1.

    “If we assume that the standard description of the universe in terms of the classical space-time becomes possible only below the Planck density M 4 p = 1”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The potential is flat, V(φ)=V.

    “Assuming, as before, that the potential is flat, V (φ) = V , one can separate the variables and reduce this equation to the equation for the wave function of the scale factor Ψ(a):”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Adding any matter contribution to the energy-momentum tensor makes going back in time result in a curvature singularity.

    “It is clear, however, that at least one of the properties of our solution is not generic: If one adds any matter contribution to the energy-momentum tensor, then going back in time will result in the curvature singularity.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Initially all space dimensions were compact; later some continued expansion while others became stabilized.

    “Therefore it seems natural to assume that initially all space dimensions were compact; later some of them continued expansion, whereas some others become stabilized, e.g. by the KKLT mechanism [28].”
8 of 8

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

1 of 1

Citations

Cites

Show all 59 references

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Friedmann A, 1923, Mir Kak Prostranstvo i Vremya, The Universe as Space and Time
  2. Schwarzschild K, 1900, Vierteljahrschrift der Ast. Ges., 35, 67
  3. Zeldovich Y B, 1984, Sov. Astron. Lett., 10, 135
  4. Heckmann O, 1959, Handbuch der Physik, 53, 515
  5. Sokolov D D, 1975, Sov. Phys. JETP, 39, 196
  6. Sokolov D D, 1976, Sov. Astron., 19, 629
  7. Zeldovich Y B, 1972, Sov. Phys. JETP, 34, 1159
  8. Lukash V N, 1974, Sov. Phys. JETP, 39, 933

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 158

Metadata

Authors
Linde, A.
Affiliations
Stanford University (US)
Corresponding author
Linde, Andrei
Venue
Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics
Published
2004-10-05
Volume
2004
Issue
10
Pages
004-004
ISSN
  • 1475-7508 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-7516
OpenAlex
W2094697662
Cited by
158
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 8
FWCI
5.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
National Science Foundation (0244728)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
Keywords
quantum creation of the universe, inflationary universe, wave function of the universe, exponential suppression

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-09, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-09 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review