Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,249

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Zwicky Transient Facility: Data Processing, Products, and Archive

Open access
Masci, Frank J., Laher, Russ R., Rusholme, Ben, Shupe, David L., Groom, Steven, Surace, Jason, Jackson, Edward, Monkewitz, Serge, Beck, Ron, Flynn, David, Terek, Scott, Landry, Walter, Hacopians, Eugean, Desai, Vandana, Howell, Justin, Brooke, Tim, Imel, David, Wachter, Stefanie, Ye, Quan-Zhi, Lin, Hsing-Wen, Cenko, S. Bradley, Cunningham, Virginia, Rebbapragada, Umaa, Bue, Brian, Miller, Adam A., Mahabal, Ashish, Bellm, Eric C., Patterson, Maria T., Jurić, Mario, Golkhou, V. Zach, Ofek, Eran O., Walters, Richard, Graham, Matthew, Kasliwal, Mansi M., Dekany, Richard G., Kupfer, Thomas, Burdge, Kevin, Cannella, Christopher B., Barlow, Tom, Sistine, Angela Van, Giomi, Matteo, Fremling, Christoffer, Blagorodnova, Nadejda, Levitan, David, Riddle, Reed, Smith, Roger M., Helou, George, Prince, Thomas A., Kulkarni, Shrinivas R.·2019·Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific

Abstract

The Zwicky Transient Facility (ZTF) is a new robotic time-domain survey currently in progress using the Palomar 48-inch Schmidt Telescope. ZTF uses a 47 square degree field with a 600 megapixel camera to scan the entire northern visible sky at rates of ∼3760 square degrees/hour to median depths of g ∼ 20.8 and r ∼ 20.6 mag (AB, 5 σ in 30 sec). We describe the Science Data System that is housed at IPAC, Caltech. This comprises the data-processing pipelines, alert production system, data archive, and user interfaces for accessing and analyzing the products. The real-time pipeline employs a novel image-differencing algorithm, optimized for the detection of point-source transient events. These events are vetted for reliability using a machine-learned classifier and combined with contextual information to generate data-rich alert packets. The packets become available for distribution typically within 13 minutes (95th percentile) of observation. Detected events are also linked to generate candidate moving-object tracks using a novel algorithm. Objects that move fast enough to streak in the individual exposures are also extracted and vetted. We present some preliminary results of the calibration performance delivered by the real-time pipeline. The reconstructed astrometric accuracy per science image with respect to Gaia DR1 is typically 45 to 85 milliarcsec. This is the RMS per-axis on the sky for sources extracted with photometric S/N ≥ 10 and hence corresponds to the typical astrometric uncertainty down to this limit. The derived photometric precision (repeatability) at bright unsaturated fluxes varies between 8 and 25 millimag. The high end of these ranges corresponds to an airmass approaching ∼2—the limit of the public survey. Photometric calibration accuracy with respect to Pan-STARRS1 is generally better than 2%. The products support a broad range of scientific applications: fast and young supernovae; rare flux transients; variable stars; eclipsing binaries; variability from active galactic nuclei; counterparts to gravitational wave sources; a more complete census of Type Ia supernovae; and solar-system objects.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1538-3873/aae8ac

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 1,249

Metadata

Authors
Masci, F. J., Laher, R. R., Rusholme, B., Shupe, D. L., Groom, S., Surace, J., Jackson, E., Monkewitz, S., Beck, R., Flynn, D., Terek, S., Landry, W., Hacopians, E., Desai, V., Howell, J., Brooke, T., Imel, D., Wachter, S., Ye, Q.-Z., Lin, H.-W., Cenko, S. B., Cunningham, V., Rebbapragada, U., Bue, B., Miller, A. A., Mahabal, A., Bellm, E. C., Patterson, M. T., Jurić, M., Golkhou, V. Z., Ofek, E. O., Walters, R., Graham, M., Kasliwal, M. M., Dekany, R. G., Kupfer, T., Burdge, K., Cannella, C. B., Barlow, T., Sistine, A. V., Giomi, M., Fremling, C., Blagorodnova, N., Levitan, D., Riddle, R., Smith, R. M., Helou, G., Prince, T. A., & Kulkarni, S. R.
Venue
Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific
Published
2018-12-07
Volume
131
Issue
995
Pages
018003
ISSN
  • 0004-6280 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-3873
OpenAlex
W2905241809
Cited by
1,249
References
4
FWCI
62.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Zwicky Transient Facility: Data Processing, Products, and Archive. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/1538-3873/aae8ac
The paper
Masci, F. J., Laher, R. R., Rusholme, B., Shupe, D. L., Groom, S., Surace, J., Jackson, E., Monkewitz, S., Beck, R., Flynn, D., Terek, S., Landry, W., Hacopians, E., Desai, V., Howell, J., Brooke, T., Imel, D., Wachter, S., Ye, Q.-Z., . . . Kulkarni, S. R. (2019). The Zwicky Transient Facility: Data Processing, Products, and Archive. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific. https://doi.org/10.1088/1538-3873/aae8ac

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.