Cited by 100Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental ImpactLand Use and Ecosystem ServicesAgricultural and Food Production Studies

A vast range of opportunities for feeding the world in 2050: trade-off between diet, N contamination and international trade

Open access
Billen, Gilles, Lassaletta, Luis, Garnier, Josette·2015·Environmental Research Letters

Abstract

Through a detailed analysis of the FAO database, we have constructed a generalized representation of the nitrogen transfers characterizing the current agro-food system (GRAFS) of 12 macro-regions of the world in terms of functional relationships between crop farming, livestock breeding and human nutrition. Based on this model, and maintaining the current cropland areas and the performance of cropping and livestock systems in each region, we have assessed the possibilities of meeting the protein requirements of the estimated world population in 2050, according to various combinations of three critical drivers namely human diet (total amount of protein consumed and share of animal protein in this total), regional livestock production and crop fertilization intensity, in each region. The results show that feeding the projected 2050 world population would generally imply higher levels of inter-regional trade and of environmental nitrogen contamination than the current levels, but that the scenarios with less recourse to inter-regional trade generally produce less N losses to the environment. If an equitable human diet (in terms of protein consumption) is to be established globally (the same in all regions of the world), the fraction of animal protein should not exceed 40% of a total ingestion of 4 kgN capita −1 yr −1 , or 25% of a total consumption of 5 kgN capita −1 yr −1 . Our results show that slightly improving the agronomical performance in the most deficient regions (namely Maghreb, the Middle East, sub-Saharan Africa, and India) would make it possible not only to meet the global protein requirements with much less international trade (hence more food sovereignty), but also to reduce N environmental contamination the most efficiently.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1748-9326/10/2/025001

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Schmitz C et al 2012 Trading more food: implications for land use, greenhouse gas emissions, and the food system Glob. Environ. Change 22 189-209 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Billen, G., Lassaletta, L., & Garnier, J.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Milieux environnementaux, transferts et interactions dans les hydrosystèmes et les sols (FR)
Corresponding author
Billen, Gilles
Venue
Environmental Research Letters
Published
2015-01-26
Volume
10
Issue
2
Pages
025001
ISSN
1748-9326 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2069396979
Cited by
100
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 6
FWCI
12.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Environmental Research Letters (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
French National Research Agency (EMoSEM project (ANR-12-SEAS- 0005-0)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Agricultural and Food Production Studies
Keywords
global food security, nitrogen pollution, international food trade, protein requirements, animal protein intake, animal husbandry, food sovereignty, nitrogen loss

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review