Cited by 561Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental ImpactEconomics of Agriculture and Food MarketsClimate change impacts on agriculture

The future of food demand: understanding differences in global economic models

Open access
Valin, Hugo, Sands, Ronald D., van der Mensbrugghe, Dominique, Nelson, Gerald C., Ahammad, Helal, Blanc, Elodie, Bodirsky, Benjamin, Fujimori, Shinichiro +11 more·2014·Agricultural Economics

Abstract

Understanding the capacity of agricultural systems to feed the world population under climate change requires projecting future food demand. This article reviews demand modeling approaches from 10 global economic models participating in the Agricultural Model Intercomparison and Improvement Project (AgMIP). We compare food demand projections in 2050 for various regions and agricultural products under harmonized scenarios of socioeconomic development, climate change, and bioenergy expansion. In the reference scenario (SSP2), food demand increases by 59-98% between 2005 and 2050, slightly higher than the most recent FAO projection of 54% from 2005/2007. The range of results is large, in particular for animal calories (between 61% and 144%), caused by differences in demand systems specifications, and in income and price elasticities. The results are more sensitive to socioeconomic assumptions than to climate change or bioenergy scenarios. When considering a world with higher population and lower economic growth (SSP3), consumption per capita drops on average by 9% for crops and 18% for livestock. The maximum effect of climate change on calorie availability is -6% at the global level, and the effect of biofuel production on calorie availability is even smaller.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/agec.12089

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Valin, H., Sands, R. D., van der Mensbrugghe, D., Nelson, G. C., Ahammad, H., Blanc, E., Bodirsky, B., Fujimori, S., Hasegawa, T., Havlik, P., Heyhoe, E., Kyle, P., Mason-D'Croz, D., Paltsev, S., Rolinski, S., Tabeau, A., van Meijl, H., von Lampe, M., & Willenbockel, D.
Affiliations
  • International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (AT)
  • Economic Research Service (US)
  • Agricultural Development Economics Division (ESAD); Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO); Viale delle Terme di Caracalla; Roma 00153 Italy
  • International Food Policy Research Institute (US)
  • Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences (AU)
  • Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change; Massachusetts Institute of Technology; 77 Massachusetts Ave. Cambridge MA 02139-4307 USA
  • Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (DE)
  • National Institute for Environmental Studies (JP)
  • Ecosystems Services and Management Program; International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA); Schlossplatz 1 2361 Laxenburg Austria
  • Joint Global Change Research Institute (US)
  • Environment and Production Technology Division; International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI); 2033 K St., NW Washington DC 20006-1002 USA
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
  • Wageningen University & Research (NL)
  • Agricultural Economics Research Institute (LEI); Wageningen University and Research Centre; 2585 DB The Hague Netherlands
  • Trade and Agriculture Directorate (TAD); Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD); 2 rue André Pascal, 75775 Paris Cedex 16 France
  • University of Sussex (GB)
Venue
Agricultural Economics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-12-10
Volume
45
Issue
1
Pages
51-67
ISSN
0169-5150 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1993769610
Cited by
561
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 48 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 64 · 2022: 62 · 2021: 76 · 2020: 78 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 4
FWCI
18.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Agricultural Economics (publishedVersion)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • IFPRI E-brary (International Food Policy Research Institute) (submittedVersion)
  • CGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • International Food Policy Research Institute (International Food Policy Research Institute) (submittedVersion)
  • Publication Database PIK (Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK)) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • IIASA PURE (International Institute of Applied Systems Analysis) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (25285076)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Climate change impacts on agriculture
Keywords
food demand projections, global economic model, AgMIP, Shared Socioeconomic Pathways, income elasticity, price elasticity, animal product consumption, calorie availability, population growth

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review