Cited by 32Fire effects on ecosystemsConservation, Biodiversity, and Resource ManagementForest Management and Policy

Intensification of fire regimes and forest loss in the Território Indígena do Xingu

Open access
Silvério, Divino V, Oliveira, Robson Santana, Flores, Bernardo Monteiro, Brando, Paulo M, Almada, Hellen Kezia, Furtado, Marco Túlio, Moreira, Fabio Garcia, Heckenberger, Michael +2 more·2022·Environmental Research Letters

Abstract

The contemporary fire regime of southern Amazonian forests has been dominated by interactions between droughts and sources of fire ignition associated with deforestation and slash-and-burn agriculture. Until recently, wildfires have been concentrated mostly on private properties, with protected areas functioning as large-scale firebreaks along the Amazon’s agricultural frontier. However, as the climate changes, protected forests have become increasingly flammable. Here, we have quantified forest degradation in the Território Indígena do Xingu (TIX), an iconic area of 2.8 million hectares where over 6000 people from 16 different ethnic Indigenous groups live across 100 villages. Our main hypothesis was that forest degradation, defined here as areas with lower canopy cover, inside the TIX is increasing due to pervasive sources of fire ignition, more frequent extreme drought events, and changing slash-and-burn agricultural practices. Between 2001 and 2020, nearly 189 000 hectares (∼7%) of the TIX became degraded by recurrent drought and fire events that were the main factors driving forest degradation, particularly in seasonally flooded forests. After three fire events, the probability of forest loss was higher in seasonally flooded areas (63%) compared to upland areas (41%). Given the same fire frequency, areas that have not suffered with extreme droughts showed a 24% lower probability of forest loss compared to areas that experienced three drought events. Distance from villages and human density also had a marked effect on forest cover loss, which was generally higher in areas close to the largest villages. In one of the most culturally diverse Indigenous lands of the Amazon, in a landscape highly threatened by deforestation, our findings demonstrate that climate change may have already exceeded the conditions to which the system has adapted.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1748-9326/ac5713

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Estimates from the southern Amazon indicate that 5−6% of the landscape has already shifted into degraded open-canopy ecosystems due to deforestation and fires.

    “Estimates from the southern Amazon indicate that 5−6% of the landscape has already shifted into degraded open-canopy ecosystems due to deforestation and fires45,96.”

    From Critical transitions in the Amazon forest system (2024) · cites this paper as [45]

    The Results report forest-cover loss in the Território Indígena do Xingu, with fire the most important predictor, and the Abstract describes degradation as reduced canopy cover. But the paper estimates approximately 7% for this specific territory, not 5–6% of the southern Amazon landscape. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In bistable regions of the Amazon forest with annual rainfall below 1,800 mm, shifts to degraded open-canopy ecosystems are relatively common after repeated disturbances by fire.

    “In bistable regions of the Amazon forest with annual rainfall below 1,800 mm (Extended Data Fig. 1b), shifts to degraded open-canopy ecosystems are relatively common after repeated disturbances by fire45,96.”

    From Critical transitions in the Amazon forest system (2024) · cites this paper as [45]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) reports that, after three consecutive fires, over half of the forests studied in the Território Indígena do Xingu entered a degraded state that could persist for years or decades. This supports the repeated-fire and degradation part of the claim, but the paper does not establish that such shifts are relatively common across Amazonian bistable regions. The 1,800 mm rainfall boundary is attributed in the citing sentence to its own Extended Data figure, not specifically to this source. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • New fire regimes are burning larger forest areas, emitting more carbon to the atmosphere and forcing IPLCs to readapt.

    “As a result, new fire regimes are burning larger forest areas43, emitting more carbon to the atmosphere44 and forcing IPLCs to readapt45.”

    From Critical transitions in the Amazon forest system (2024) · cites this paper as [45]

  • Although these ecosystem transitions have been confirmed only in the Negro river basin, floodplain forests in other parts of the Amazon were shown to be particularly vulnerable to collapse.

    “Although these ecosystem transitions have been confirmed only in the Negro river basin (central Amazon), floodplain forests in other parts of the Amazon were shown to be particularly vulnerable to collapse45,64,65.”

    From Critical transitions in the Amazon forest system (2024) · cites this paper as [45]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 49

  1. Alencar A, Solórzano L and Nepstad D C 2004 Modeling forest understory fires in an eastern Amazonian landscape Ecol. Appl. 14 139-49 · DOI
  2. Aragão L E O C et al 2018 21st Century drought-related fires counteract the decline of Amazon deforestation carbon emissions Nat. Commun. 9 536 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Aragão L E O C, Malhi Y, Roman-Cuesta R M, Saatchi S, Anderson L O and Shimabukuro Y E 2007 Spatial patterns and fire response of recent Amazonian droughts Geophys. Res. Lett. 34 L07701 Baccini A, Walker W, Carvalho L, Farina M, Sulla-Menashe D and Houghton R A 2017 Tropical forests are a net carbon source based on aboveground measurements of gain and loss Science 358 230-4 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Balch J K J K et al 2015 The susceptibility of southeastern Amazon forests to fire: insights from a large-scale burn experiment Bioscience 65 893-905 · DOI
  5. Barkhordarian A, Saatchi S S, Behrangi A, Loikith P C and Mechoso C R 2019 A recent systematic increase in vapor pressure deficit over tropical South America Sci. Rep. 9 15331 BDGEX Army geographic database 2019 (available at: https://bdgex.eb.mil.br/bdgexapp) (Accessed 30 December 2019) · DOI
  6. Bivand R S, Pebesma E and Gómez-Rubio V 2013 Applied Spatial Data Analysis with R 2nd edn (Berlin: Springer)
  7. Bozdogan H 1987 Model selection and Akaike's information criterion (AIC): the general theory and its analytical extensions Psychometrika 52 345-70 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Brando P M et al 2014 Abrupt increases in Amazonian tree mortality due to drought-fire interactions Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111 1-6 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Brando P M, Soares-Filho B, Rodrigues L, Assunção A, Morton D, Tuchschneider D, Fernandes E C M, Macedo M N, Oliveira U and Coe M T 2020a The gathering firestorm in southern Amazonia Sci. Adv. 6 eaay1632 Brando P, Macedo M, Silvério D, Rattis L, Paolucci L, Alencar A, Coe M and Amorim C 2020b Amazon wildfires: scenes from a foreseeable disaster Flora Morphol. Distrib. Funct. Ecol. Plants 268 151609 · DOI
  10. Bush M B, Silman M R, de Toledo M B, Listopad C, Gosling W D, Williams C, de Oliveira P E and Krisel C 2007 Holocene fire and occupation in Amazonia: records from two lake districts Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 362 209-18 · DOI
  11. Cochrane M A and Schulze M D 1999 Fire as a recurrent event in tropical forests of the eastern Amazon : effects on forest structure, biomass, and species composition Biotropica 31 2-16 · DOI
  12. Cox P M, Betts R A, Jones C D, Spall S A and Totterdell I J 2000 Acceleration of global warming due to carbon-cycle feedbacks in a coupled climate model Nature 408 184-8 · DOI
  13. Almeida D R A, Nelson B W, Schietti J, Gorgens E B, Resende A F, Stark S C and Valbuena R 2016 Contrasting fire damage and fire susceptibility between seasonally flooded forest and upland forest in the Central Amazon using portable profiling LiDAR Remote Sens. Environ. 184 153-60 · DOI
  14. de Resende A F, Nelson B W, Flores B M and de Almeida D R 2014 Fire damage in seasonally flooded and upland forests of the Central Amazon Biotropica 46 643-6 DSEI Xingu 2017 Distrito Sanitário Especial Indígena (DSEI) Xingu: Dados Demográficos do Xingu. Canarana, Mato Grosso (available at: http://www.saudeindigena.net.br/) (Retrieved 30 December 2017) · DOI
  15. Duffy P B, Brando P, Asner G P and Field C B 2015 Projections of future meteorological drought and wet periods in the Amazon Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 112 201421010 · DOI
  16. Flores B M, Holmgren M, Xu C, Van Nes E H, Jakovac C C, Mesquita R C G and Scheffer M 2017 Floodplains as an Achilles' heel of Amazonian forest resilience Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114 4442-6 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Flores B M, Piedade M T F and Nelson B W 2014 Fire disturbance in Amazonian blackwater floodplain forests Plant Ecol. Divers 7 319-27 · DOI
  18. Flores B M, Staal A, Jakovac C C, Hirota M, Holmgren M and Oliveira R S 2020 Soil erosion as a resilience drain in disturbed tropical forests Plant Soil 450 11-25 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Fu R et al 2013 Increased dry-season length over southern Amazonia in recent decades and its implication for future climate projection Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110 18110-5 · DOI
  20. Hansen M C et al 2013 High-resolution global maps of 21st-Century forest cover change Science 342 850-3 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Heckenberger M J, Kuikuro A, Kuikuro U T, Russell J C, Schmidt M, Fausto C and Franchetto B 2003 Amazonia 1492: pristine forest or cultural parkland? Science 301 1710-4 · DOI
  22. Hess L L, Melack J M, Affonso A G, Barbosa C, Gastil-Buhl M and Novo E M L M 2015 Wetlands of the lowland Amazon basin: extent, vegetative cover, and dual-season inundated area as mapped with JERS-1 synthetic aperture radar Wetlands 35 745-56 · DOI
  23. Hirota M, Holmgren M, Van Nes E H and Scheffer M 2011 Global resilience of tropical forest and savanna to critical transitions Science 334 232-5 ISA 2011 Almanaque Socioambiental Parque Indígena do Xingu: 50 anos ed M Kahn and M Campanili (São Paulo: Instituto Socioambiental) · DOI
  24. Kruid S, Macedo M N, Gorelik S R, Walker W, Moutinho P, Brando P M, Castanho A, Alencar A, Baccini A and Coe M T 2021 Beyond Deforestation: Carbon Emissions From Land Grabbing and Forest Degradation in the Brazilian AmazonData_Sheet_1.PDF Front. For. Glob. Change 4 645282 · DOI
  25. Latrubesse E M, Stevaux J C and Sinha R 2005 Tropical rivers Geomorphology 70 187-206 · DOI
  26. Levis C et al 2017 Persistent effects of pre-Columbian plant domestication on Amazonian forest composition Science 355 925-31 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Levis C et al 2018 How people domesticated Amazonian forests Front. Ecol. Evol. 5 171 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Malhi Y, Roberts J T, Betts R A, Killeen T J, Li W and Nobre C A 2008 Climate change, deforestation, and the fate of the Amazon Science 319 169-72 · DOI
  29. McDowell N et al 2018 Drivers and mechanisms of tree mortality in moist tropical forests New Phytol. 219 851-69 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Meggers B J 1994 Archeological evidence for the impact of mega-Niño events on Amazonia during the past two millennia Clim. Change 28 321-38 · DOI
  31. Morton D C, Le Page Y, DeFries R, Collatz G J and Hurtt G C 2013 Understorey fire frequency and the fate of burned forests in southern Amazonia Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 368 20120163 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Nepstad D et al 2006 Inhibition of Amazon deforestation and fire by parks and indigenous lands Conserv. Biol. 20 65-73 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Nepstad D, Lefebvre P, Lopes da Silva U, Tomasella J, Schlesinger P, Solorzano L, Moutinho P, Ray D and Guerreira B J 2004 Amazon drought and its implications for forest flammability and tree growth: a basin-wide analysis Glob. Change Biol. 10 704-17 · DOI
  34. Nobre C A, Sampaio G, Borma L S, Castilla-Rubio J C, Silva J S and Cardoso M 2016 Land-use and climate change risks in the amazon and the need of a novel sustainable development paradigm Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113 10759-68 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Olofsson P, Foody G M, Herold M, Stehman S V, Woodcock C E and Wulder M A 2014 Good practices for estimating area and assessing accuracy of land change Remote Sens. Environ. 148 42-57 · DOI
  36. Olofsson P, Foody G M, Stehman S V and Woodcock C E 2013 Making better use of accuracy data in land change studies: Estimating accuracy and area and quantifying uncertainty using stratified estimation Remote Sens. Environ. 129 122-31 · DOI
  37. Piperno D 1997 Phytoliths and microscopic charcoal from Leg 155: a vegetational and fire history of the Amazon Basin during the last 75 k.y Proc. ODP, Sci. Results, 155: College Station Flood R D, Piper D J W, Klaus A and Peterson L C (Texas: Ocean Drilling Program) pp 411-8 · DOI
  38. Pueyo S, de Alencastro Graça P M L, Barbosa R I, Cots R, Cardona E and Fearnside P M 2010 Testing for criticality in ecosystem dynamics: the case of Amazonian rainforest and savanna fire Ecol. Lett. 13 793-802 · DOI
  39. Rowland L et al 2015 Death from drought in tropical forests is triggered by hydraulics not carbon starvation Nature 528 119-22 · DOI
  40. Sanford R L J, Saldarriaga J, Clark K E, Uhl C and Herrera R 1985 Amazon rain-forest fires Science 227 53-55 · DOI
  41. Scheffer M, Carpenter S R, Dakos V and Van Nes E H 2015 Generic indicators of ecological resilience: inferring the chance of a critical transition Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 46 145-67 · DOI
  42. Schmidt M V C, Ikpeng Y U, Kayabi T, Sanches R A, Ono K Y and Adams C 2021 Indigenous knowledge and forest succession management in the Brazilian Amazon : contributions to reforestation of degraded areas Front. For. Glob. Change 4 1-21 · DOI · Paper page
  43. Schwartzman S et al 2013 The natural and social history of the indigenous lands and protected areas corridor of the Xingu River basin Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 368 20120164 · DOI
  44. Silvério D V, Brando P M, Balch J K, Putz F E, Nepstad D C, Oliveira-Santos C and Bustamante M M C 2013 Testing the Amazon savannization hypothesis : fire effects on invasion of a neotropical forest by native cerrado and exotic pasture grasses Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 368 20120427 · DOI · Paper page
  45. Silvério D V, Brando P M, Bustamante M M C, Putz F E, Marra D M, Levick S R and Trumbore S E 2019 Fire, fragmentation, and windstorms: a recipe for tropical forest degradation ed D Edwards J. Ecol. 107 656-67 · DOI
  46. Silvério D V, Brando P M, Macedo M N, Beck P S, Bustamante M and Coe M T 2015 Agricultural expansion dominates climate changes in southeastern Amazonia: the overlooked non-GHG forcing Environ. Res. Lett. 10 104015 · DOI
  47. Staver A C, Archibald S and Levin S A 2011 The global extent and determinants of savanna and forest as alternative biome states Science 334 230-2 · DOI · Paper page
  48. Trumbore S, Brando P and Hartmann H 2015 Forest health and global change Science 349 814-8 · DOI · Paper page
  49. Walker W S et al 2020 The role of forest conversion, degradation, and disturbance in the carbon dynamics of Amazon indigenous territories and protected areas Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117 3015-25 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Silvério, D. V., Oliveira, R. S., Flores, B. M., Brando, P. M., Almada, H. K., Furtado, M. T., Moreira, F. G., Heckenberger, M., Ono, K. Y., & Macedo, M. N.
Affiliations
  • Universidade do Estado de Mato Grosso (BR)
  • Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (BR)
  • University of California, Irvine (US)
  • Instituto de Pesquisa Ambiental da Amazônia (BR)
  • Fundação Renova (BR)
  • University of Florida (US)
  • Instituto Sócioambiental (BR)
  • Woodwell Climate Research Center (US)
Corresponding author
Silvério, Divino V
Venue
Environmental Research Letters
Published
2022-03-21
Volume
17
Issue
4
Pages
045012
ISSN
1748-9326 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4213389811
Cited by
32
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1
FWCI
2.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Environmental Research Letters (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation (9957)
  • Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (442710/2018-6)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Forest Management and Policy
Keywords
forest degradation, forest loss, drought, shifting cultivation, indigenous territories, seasonally flooded forest, human population density, climate change adaptation, Amazon deforestation, forest fires

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review