The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Tissue Classification with Gene Expression Profiles
Abstract
Constantly improving gene expression profiling technologies are expected to provide understanding and insight into cancer-related cellular processes. Gene expression data is also expected to significantly aid in the development of efficient cancer diagnosis and classification platforms. In this work we examine three sets of gene expression data measured across sets of tumor(s) and normal clinical samples: The first set consists of 2,000 genes, measured in 62 epithelial colon samples (Alon et al., 1999). The second consists of approximately equal to 100,000 clones, measured in 32 ovarian samples (unpublished extension of data set described in Schummer et al. (1999)). The third set consists of approximately equal to 7,100 genes, measured in 72 bone marrow and peripheral blood samples (Golub et al, 1999). We examine the use of scoring methods, measuring separation of tissue type (e.g., tumors from normals) using individual gene expression levels. These are then coupled with high-dimensional classification methods to assess the classification power of complete expression profiles. We present results of performing leave-one-out cross validation (LOOCV) experiments on the three data sets, employing nearest neighbor classifier, SVM (Cortes and Vapnik, 1995), AdaBoost (Freund and Schapire, 1997) and a novel clustering-based classification technique. As tumor samples can differ from normal samples in their cell-type composition, we also perform LOOCV experiments using appropriately modified sets of genes, attempting to eliminate the resulting bias. We demonstrate success rate of at least 90% in tumor versus normal classification, using sets of selected genes, with, as well as without, cellular-contamination-related members. These results are insensitive to the exact selection mechanism, over a certain range.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cortes, C., & Vapnik, V. (1995) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/bf00994018 · Cited by 59,421
A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting
Freund, Y., & Schapire, R. E. (1997) · Journal of Computer and System Sciences · doi:10.1006/jcss.1997.1504 · Cited by 20,466
Cluster analysis and display of genome-wide expression patterns
Eisen, M. B., Spellman, P. T., Brown, P. O., & Botstein, D. (1998) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.95.25.14863 · Cited by 16,184
The Strength of Weak Learnability
Schapire, R. E. (1990) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/bf00116037 · Cited by 4,600
Cited by
Network‐based classification of breast cancer metastasis
Chuang, H., Lee, E., Liu, Y., Lee, D., & Ideker, T. (2007) · Molecular Systems Biology · doi:10.1038/msb4100180 · Cited by 1,431
Machine learning in bioinformatics
Larrañaga, P., Calvo, B., Santana, R., Bielza, C., Galdiano, J., Inza, I., Lozano, J. A., Armañanzas, R., Santafé, G., Pérez, A., et al. (2006) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbk007 · Cited by 867
Discovering motifs in ranked lists of DNA sequences
Eden, E., Lipson, D., Yogev, S., & Yakhini, Z. (2007) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030039 · Cited by 696
A survey on filter techniques for feature selection in gene expression microarray analysis
Lazar, C., Taminau, J., Meganck, S., Steenhoff, D., Coletta, A., Molter, C., de Schaetzen, V., Duque, R., Bersini, H., & Nowe, A. (2012) · IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1109/tcbb.2012.33 · Cited by 619
Feature selection with multi-view data: A survey
Zhang, R., Nie, F., Li, X., & Wei, X. (2019) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2018.11.019 · Cited by 313
Genome scan for cis-regulatory DNA motifs associated with social behavior in honey bees
Sinha, S., Ling, X., Whitfield, C. W., Zhai, C., & Robinson, G. E. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0607448103 · Cited by 52
Translational bioinformatics and healthcare informatics: computational and ethical challenges.
(2009) · PubMed Central · Cited by 24
Mohsenzadeh, Y., Sheikhzadeh, H., & Nazari, S. (2016) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2016.06.028 · Cited by 22
A steroid metabolomic approach to 17α-hydroxylase/17,20 lyase deficiency
Tiosano, D., Navon, R., Flor, O., Knopf, C., Hartmann, M. F., Wudy, S. A., Yakhini, Z., & Hochberg, Z. (2010) · Metabolomics · doi:10.1007/s11306-010-0217-8 · Cited by 4
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Ben-Dor, A., Bruhn, L., Friedman, N., Nachman, I., Schummer, M., & Yakhini, Z.
- Venue
- Journal of Computational Biology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2000-08
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 3-4
- Pages
- 559-583
- ISSN
- 1066-5277 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-8666
- OpenAlex
- W2611104316
- Cited by
- 741
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 13.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.