Cited by 120Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPsychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsHealth, psychology, and well-being

Clinical Applications of the Relaxation Response and Mind-Body Interventions

Jacobs, Gregg D.·2001·The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine

Abstract

Several hundred peer-reviewed studies in the past 20 years have shown that the relaxation response and mind-body interventions are clinically effective in the treatment of many health problems that are caused or made worse by stress. Recent studies show that mind-body interventions may improve prognosis in coronary heart disease and can enhance immune functioning. It is hypothesized that mind-body interventions reduce sympathetic nervous system activation and increase parasympathetic nervous system activity, and thereby restore homeostasis. Researchers have also concluded that cognitive therapy is as effective, and possibly more effective than antidepressant medication in the treatment of major depression. This report provides an overview of some studies that have shown a beneficial role of the relaxation response and cognitive restructuring in the treatment of headaches, insomnia, and cardiovascular disorders. Studies to date suggest that mind-body interventions are effective and can also provide cost savings in patient treatment. It is also clear, however, that mind-body therapies are not panaceas, and should be used in conjunction with standard medical care.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/107555301753393850

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jacobs, G. D.
Affiliations
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Jacobs, Gregg D.
Venue
The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine
Published
2001-12-02
Volume
7
Issue
supplement 1
Pages
93-101
ISSN
  • 1075-5535 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-7708
OpenAlex
W2055246641
Cited by
120
References
31
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 5
FWCI
2.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health, psychology, and well-being
Keywords
relaxation response, mind-body interventions, stress, coronary artery disease, immune function, sympathetic nervous system, parasympathetic nervous system, homeostasis, cognitive therapy, major depressive disorder, cognitive restructuring, headache, insomnia, cardiovascular disease, cost reduction
MeSH terms
Cardiovascular Diseases, Humans, Internal-External Control, Parasympathetic Nervous System, Relaxation, Relaxation Therapy, Stress, Psychological, Sympathetic Nervous System, Mind-Body Relations, Metaphysical

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review