The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 1 are not checked yet.
Virtual Reality Intervention for Older Women with Breast Cancer
Open accessAbstract
This study examined the effects of a virtual reality distraction intervention on chemotherapy-related symptom distress levels in 16 women aged 50 and older. A cross-over design was used to answer the following research questions: (1) Is virtual reality an effective distraction intervention for reducing chemotherapy-related symptom distress levels in older women with breast cancer? (2) Does virtual reality have a lasting effect? Chemotherapy treatments are intensive and difficult to endure. One way to cope with chemotherapy-related symptom distress is through the use of distraction. For this study, a head-mounted display (Sony PC Glasstron PLM - S700) was used to display encompassing images and block competing stimuli during chemotherapy infusions. The Symptom Distress Scale (SDS), Revised Piper Fatigue Scale (PFS), and the State Anxiety Inventory (SAI) were used to measure symptom distress. For two matched chemotherapy treatments, one pre-test and two post-test measures were employed. Participants were randomly assigned to receive the VR distraction intervention during one chemotherapy treatment and received no distraction intervention (control condition) during an alternate chemotherapy treatment. Analysis using paired t-tests demonstrated a significant decrease in the SAI (p = 0.10) scores immediately following chemotherapy treatments when participants used VR. No significant changes were found in SDS or PFS values. There was a consistent trend toward improved symptoms on all measures 48 h following completion of chemotherapy. Evaluation of the intervention indicated that women thought the head mounted device was easy to use, they experienced no cybersickness, and 100% would use VR again.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Also consistent, it was found to be acceptable and safe to use across several settings including inpatient, outpatient and day care.17–19 65–67”
From SafeSpace: what is the feasibility and acceptability of a codesigned virtual reality intervention, incorporating compassionate mind training, to support people undergoing cancer treatment in a clinical setting? (2022) · cites this paper as [17]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Research17–19 has highlighted benefits in chemotherapy populations in particular, with reduction of fatigue, anxiety, symptom distress and perception of time.”
From SafeSpace: what is the feasibility and acceptability of a codesigned virtual reality intervention, incorporating compassionate mind training, to support people undergoing cancer treatment in a clinical setting? (2022) · cites this paper as [17]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“This is consistent with wider literature in which new technologies were also found to be favourable, in their case, regardless of age, background or gender.17 65”
From SafeSpace: what is the feasibility and acceptability of a codesigned virtual reality intervention, incorporating compassionate mind training, to support people undergoing cancer treatment in a clinical setting? (2022) · cites this paper as [17]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“using heart rate as a physiological surrogate for anxiety and distress.12”
From Impacts of Intrafraction Virtual Reality-Based Environment Modification on Procedural Anxiety, Heart Rate, and Overall Radiation Therapy Experience During External Beam Radiation Therapy (2024) · cites this paper as [12]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6 · Cited by 88,282
“Stress: appraisal and coping,”
Folkman, S. (2013) · Encyclopedia of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-1005-9_215 · Cited by 27,833
(1970) · Cited by 24,983
Hirono, N., Mori, E., Ikejiri, Y., Imamura, T., Shimomura, T., Hashimoto, M., Yamashita, H., & Ikeda, M. (1997) · PubMed · Cited by 21,012
Kok, J. S., Berg, I. J., & Scherder, E. J. A. (2013) · Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders Extra · doi:10.1159/000353441 · Cited by 20,589
Older Adults' Reasons for Using Technology while Aging in Place
Peek, S. T. M., Luijkx, K. G., Rijnaard, M. D., Nieboer, M. E., van der Voort, C. S., Aarts, S., van Hoof, J., Vrijhoef, H. J., & Wouters, E. (2015) · Gerontology · doi:10.1159/000430949 · Cited by 19,852
Sensitivity and False Alarm Rate of a Fall Sensor in Long-Term Fall Detection in the Elderly
Kangas, M., Korpelainen, R., Vikman, I., Nyberg, L., & Jämsä, T. J. (2014) · Gerontology · doi:10.1159/000362720 · Cited by 19,007
Jemal, A., Murray, T., Samuels, A., Ghafoor, A., Ward, E., & Thun, M. J. (2003) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/canjclin.53.1.5 · Cited by 3,275
(2019) · doi:10.1188/19.onf · Cited by 3,233
The revised Piper Fatigue Scale: psychometric evaluation in women with breast cancer.
Piper, B. F., Dibble, S. L., Dodd, M. J., Weiss, M. C., Slaughter, R. E., & Paul, S. M. (1998) · PubMed · Cited by 838
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- Lyman G.H., 1996, Cancer Control, 3, 421
- Ezzone S., 1998, Oncology Nursing Forum, 25, 1551
- Arthur C., 1992, New Scientist, 134, 22
- Pratt D.R., 1995, Computer, 7, 17
- Schneider S.M., 2000, Pediatric Nursing, 26, 593
- Oshuga M., 1998, CyberPsychology & Behavior, 1, 10
- Piper B.F., 1998, Oncology Nursing Forum, 25, 35
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ulrich, R. S., Quan, X., Joseph, A., Choudhary, R., & Zimring, C. (2004) · Cited by 649
Kangas, M., Bovbjerg, D. H., & Montgomery, G. H. (2008) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0012825 · Cited by 428
Mallari, B., Spaeth, E. K., Goh, H., & Boyd, B. S. (2019) · Journal of Pain Research · doi:10.2147/jpr.s200498 · Cited by 399
Das, D. A., Grimmer, K. A., Sparnon, A. L., McRae, S., & Thomas, B. H. (2005) · BMC Pediatrics · doi:10.1186/1471-2431-5-1 · Cited by 391
“Owing to its ability to allow the user to immerse and interact with the artificial environment that he/she can visualize, the game-playing experience is very engrossing [14-18,20-22].”
BackgroundIndovina, P., Barone, D., Gallo, L., Chirico, A., De Pietro, G., & Giordano, A. (2018) · The Clinical Journal of Pain · doi:10.1097/ajp.0000000000000599 · Cited by 388
Metadata
- Authors
- Schneider, S. M., Ellis, M., Coombs, W. T., Shonkwiler, E. L., & Folsom, L. C.
- Affiliations
- Duke University (US)
- ORCID
- Schneider, Susan M.
- Venue
- CyberPsychology & Behavior
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2003-06
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 301-307
- ISSN
- 1094-9313 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-8364
- PMC
- PMC3645300
- OpenAlex
- W2098128542
- Cited by
- 135
- References
- 36
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 0.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- europepmc.org
- Locations
- CyberPsychology & Behavior (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Nursing Research (1 P20 NR07795-01, P20NR007795)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
- Keywords
- virtual reality, breast cancer, older women, chemotherapy, symptom distress, fatigue, anxiety, head-mounted displays, cybersickness, symptom management
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Psychological, Aged, Antineoplastic Agents, Breast Neoplasms, Cognition, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Pilot Projects, Surveys and Questionnaires, User-Computer Interface
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review