Cited by 204Cancer survivorship and carePediatric Pain Management TechniquesVirtual Reality Applications and Impacts

Virtual Reality as a Distraction Intervention for Women Receiving Chemotherapy

Schneider, Susan M., Prince-Paul, Maryjo, JoAllen, Mary, Silverman, Paula, Talaba, Deborah·2004·Oncology Nursing Forum

Abstract

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: To explore the use of virtual reality as a distraction intervention to relieve symptom distress in women receiving chemotherapy for breast cancer. DESIGN: Crossover study. SETTING: The outpatient clinic of a midwestern comprehensive cancer center. SAMPLE: 20 women 18-55 years of age. METHODS: Using a crossover design, 20 subjects served as their own controls. For two matched chemotherapy treatments, one pretest and two post-test measures were employed. Participants were assigned randomly to receive the virtual reality distraction intervention during one chemotherapy treatment and received no distraction intervention (control condition) during an alternate chemotherapy treatment. An open-ended questionnaire elicited each subject's evaluation of the intervention. MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES: Symptom distress, fatigue, anxiety. FINDINGS: Significant decreases in symptom distress and fatigue occurred immediately following chemotherapy treatments when women used the virtual reality intervention. CONCLUSIONS: The distraction intervention decreased symptom distress, was well received, and was easy to implement in the clinical setting. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: Nursing interventions to manage chemotherapy-related symptom distress can improve patient quality of life and increase chances for survival by reducing treatment-related symptom distress and enhancing patients' ability to adhere to treatment regimens and cope with their disease.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1188/04.onf.81-88

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schneider, S. M., Prince-Paul, M., JoAllen, M., Silverman, P., & Talaba, D.
Affiliations
Duke University (US)
Venue
Oncology Nursing Forum
Published
2004-01-01
Volume
31
Issue
1
Pages
81-88
ISSN
  • 0190-535X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-0688
OpenAlex
W2085421485
Cited by
204
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 7
FWCI
3.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Oncology nursing forum (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
Keywords
virtual reality, distraction therapy, chemotherapy, breast cancer, symptom distress, fatigue, anxiety, nursing interventions, patient quality of life, medication adherence
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Adult, Anorexia, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Anxiety, Attention, Audiovisual Aids, Breast Neoplasms, Fatigue, Humans, Middle Aged, Models, Psychological, Nausea, Pain, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Surveys and Questionnaires, Respiration Disorders, Severity of Illness Index, Sleep Wake Disorders, User-Computer Interface, Treatment Outcome, Cross-Over Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review