Cited by 4

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Therapeutic Riding Followed by Rhythmic Auditory Stimulation to Improve Balance and Gait in a Subject with Orthopedic Pathologies

Ungermann, Cathryn M., Gras, Laura Z.·2011·The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine

Abstract

Objectives The study objectives were to investigate the effect of therapeutic riding with a subject who had an orthopedic diagnosis. Design This is a single-subject case report. Location The study was conducted at an equestrian facility with an indoor riding arena. Subject The subject was a 59-year-old woman with grade I spondylolisthesis at L4/L5 and multilevel lumbar spinal stenosis in central and foraminal canals. The subject had an anterior cervical fusion of C3-C7. Evaluation The subject has been ambulating with a straight cane due to her history of frequent falls. Gait, agility, strength, range of motion, and balance testing were performed. The subject had impairments of bilateral lower extremities with an ataxic gait pattern and was at risk for continued falls according to the balance measures. Interventions The intervention comprised therapeutic riding sessions 3 times a week for 20 minutes for 4 weeks. Each riding session was immediately followed by a 10-minute independent walking program with a metronome for rhythmic auditory stimulation. Outcome measures The outcome measures were as follows: Manual muscle testing and range of motion of the lower extremities, Gait Speed Test, Dynamic Gait Index, Four-Square Step Test, Chair Stand Test, Single Leg Stance. Results Improvements were seen in lower extremity strength and range of motion and balance. The subject improved on balance scores, placing her out of the risk for falls category. Conclusions Therapeutic riding foll…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/acm.2009.0708

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. 10.1089/107555303771952163 · DOI
  2. 10.1038/sj.sc.3101492 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.07.015 · DOI
  4. 10.1097/NPT.0b013e31806769f7 · DOI
  5. 10.1017/S0012162207000175.x · DOI
  6. Snider L, 2007, Phys Occup Ther Pediatr, 27, 5, 10.1300/J006v27n02_02 · DOI
  7. 10.1177/1545968307300523 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1191/0269215503cr621oa · DOI
  9. 14. Peterson-Kendall F, Kendall-McCreary E, Geise-Provance P, et al. Muscles Testing and Function with Posture and Pain, 5th ed. Baltimore, MD: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2005:7.
  10. 10.1016/j.apmr.2008.05.012 · DOI
  11. 10.1080/02701367.1999.10608028 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1191/0269215505cr833oa · DOI
  13. 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.08.109 · DOI
  14. Steffen TM, 2002, Phys Ther, 82, 128, 10.1093/ptj/82.2.128 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Rothhaupt D, 1997, Wien Med Wochenschr, 147, 504
  16. 10.1055/s-2007-993368 · DOI
  17. 10.1055/s-2008-1051635 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ungermann, C. M., & Gras, L. Z.
Affiliations
  • Munroe Regional Medical Center, LifeTime Centers, Ocala, FL.
  • The Sage Colleges, Doctor of Physical Therapy Program, Troy, NY.
Venue
The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine
Published
2011-12
Volume
17
Issue
12
Pages
1191-1195
ISSN
  • 1075-5535
  • 1557-7708
Cited by
4
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review