Cited by 74Cerebral Palsy and Movement DisordersHuman-Animal Interaction StudiesChildren's Physical and Motor Development

The Effect of Hippotherapy on Postural Control in Sitting for Children with Cerebral Palsy

Hamill, Darrell, Washington, Kathleen, White, Owen R.·2007·Physical & Occupational Therapy In Pediatrics

Abstract

The purpose of this single subject research study was to examine the effects of a once weekly, 10-week hippotherapy program for three children, ages 27-54 months, with cerebral palsy. Participants were rated as Level V on the Gross Motor Function Classification System. The Sitting Dimension of the Gross Motor Function Measure was used to establish a baseline of sitting abilities, and was administered every 2 weeks during intervention. The Sitting Assessment Scale and the Gross Motor Function Measure were administered before, after, and 4 weeks postintervention. Parental perceptions of the hippotherapy intervention were assessed using questionnaires. None of the children made gains on any of the standardized outcome measures. Parental perceptions were very positive, with reported improvements in range of motion and head control.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/j006v27n04_03

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • No improvement was seen for younger (2-5y), non-ambulant (GMFCS V) children receiving lower-dose (8h) hippotherapy in sitting balance (BF&S and activity; evidence level III, conduct moderate).

    “In contrast, no improvement was seen for younger (2 -5y), non-ambulant (GMFCS V) children receiving lower-dose (8h) hippotherapy (one 1h session/wk for 8wks) in sitting balance (BF&S and 'activity'; evidence level III, conduct moderate; see Table IIIb). 46”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hamill, D., Washington, K., & White, O. R.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Washington, Kathleen
Venue
Physical & Occupational Therapy In Pediatrics
Published
2007-01
Volume
27
Issue
4
Pages
23-42
ISSN
  • 0194-2638 (ISSN-L)
  • 1541-3144
OpenAlex
W2099372970
Cited by
74
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 6
FWCI
0.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Physical & Occupational Therapy In Pediatrics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Children's Physical and Motor Development
Keywords
hippotherapy, postural control, sitting, cerebral palsy, children, Gross Motor Function Classification System, Gross Motor Function Measure, parental attitudes, range of motion, head control
MeSH terms
Animals, Cerebral Palsy, Child, Preschool, Female, Horses, Humans, Male, Posture, Physical Therapy Modalities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review