Cited by 74Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchPhysical Activity and Health

Hatha Yoga Practice Improves Attention and Processing Speed in Older Adults: Results from an 8-Week Randomized Control Trial

Gothe, Neha P., Kramer, Arthur F., McAuley, Edward·2017·The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine: Paradigm, Practice, and Policy Advancing Integrative Health

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Age-related cognitive decline is well documented across various aspects of cognitive function, including attention and processing speed, and lifestyle behaviors such as physical activity play an important role in preventing cognitive decline and maintaining or even improving cognitive function. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of an 8-week Hatha yoga intervention on attention and processing speed among older adults. METHODS: Participants (n = 118; mean age, 62 ± 5.59) were randomly assigned to an 8-week Hatha yoga group or a stretching control group and completed cognitive assessments-Attention Network Task, Trail Making Test parts A and B, and Pattern Comparison Test-at baseline and after the 8-week intervention. RESULTS: Analyses of covariance revealed significantly faster reaction times for the yoga group on the Attention Network Task's neutral, congruent, and incongruent conditions (p ≤ 0.04). The yoga intervention also improved participants' visuospatial and perceptual processing on the Trail Making Test part B (p = 0.002) and pattern comparison (p < 0.001) tests. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that yoga practice that includes postures, breathing, and meditative exercises lead to improved attentional and information processing abilities. Although the underlying mechanisms remain largely speculative, more systematic trials are needed to explore the extent of cognitive benefits and their neurobiological mechanisms.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/acm.2016.0185

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gothe, N. P., Kramer, A. F., & McAuley, E.
Affiliations
  • Wayne State University (US)
  • Northeastern University (US)
  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Corresponding author
Gothe, Neha P.
Venue
The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine: Paradigm, Practice, and Policy Advancing Integrative Health
Published
2017-01
Volume
23
Issue
1
Pages
35-40
ISSN
  • 1075-5535 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-7708
OpenAlex
W2546471590
Cited by
74
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2
FWCI
6.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
Keywords
hatha yoga, attention, processing speed, older adults, age-related cognitive decline, cognitive aging, physical activity, reaction time, visuospatial processing, perceptual processing, yoga intervention
MeSH terms
Aged, Analysis of Variance, Attention, Breathing Exercises, Cognition, Cognition Disorders, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Reaction Time, Yoga, Exercise, Meditation, Spatial Processing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review