The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Upsides and Downsides of Reactive Oxygen Species for Cancer: The Roles of Reactive Oxygen Species in Tumorigenesis, Prevention, and Therapy
Open accessAbstract
SIGNIFICANCE: Extensive research during the last quarter century has revealed that reactive oxygen species (ROS) produced in the body, primarily by the mitochondria, play a major role in various cell-signaling pathways. Most risk factors associated with chronic diseases (e.g., cancer), such as stress, tobacco, environmental pollutants, radiation, viral infection, diet, and bacterial infection, interact with cells through the generation of ROS. RECENT ADVANCES: ROS, in turn, activate various transcription factors (e.g., nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells [NF-κB], activator protein-1, hypoxia-inducible factor-1α, and signal transducer and activator of transcription 3), resulting in the expression of proteins that control inflammation, cellular transformation, tumor cell survival, tumor cell proliferation and invasion, angiogenesis, and metastasis. Paradoxically, ROS also control the expression of various tumor suppressor genes (p53, Rb, and PTEN). Similarly, γ-radiation and various chemotherapeutic agents used to treat cancer mediate their effects through the production of ROS. Interestingly, ROS have also been implicated in the chemopreventive and anti-tumor action of nutraceuticals derived from fruits, vegetables, spices, and other natural products used in traditional medicine. CRITICAL ISSUES: These statements suggest both "upside" (cancer-suppressing) and "downside" (cancer-promoting) actions of the ROS. Thus, similar to tumor necrosis factor-α, inflammation, and NF-κB, ROS act as a double-edged sword. This paradox provides a great challenge for researchers whose aim is to exploit ROS stress for the development of cancer therapies. FUTURE DIRECTIONS: the various mechanisms by which ROS mediate paradoxical effects are discussed in this article. The outstanding questions and future directions raised by our current understanding are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hallmarks of Cancer: The Next Generation
Hanahan, D., & Weinberg, R. A. (2011) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013 · Cited by 66,590
Mantovani, A., Allavena, P., Sica, A., & Balkwill, F. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07205 · Cited by 11,399
How mitochondria produce reactive oxygen species
Murphy, M. P. (2009) · Biochemical Journal · doi:10.1042/bj20081386 · Cited by 8,207
The NOX Family of ROS-Generating NADPH Oxidases: Physiology and Pathophysiology
Bedard, K., & Krause, K.-H. (2007) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00044.2005 · Cited by 6,989
Free radicals, metals and antioxidants in oxidative stress-induced cancer
Valko, M., Rhodes, C. J., Moncol, J., Izakovic, M., & Mazur, M. (2006) · Chemico-Biological Interactions · doi:10.1016/j.cbi.2005.12.009 · Cited by 6,680
Targeting cancer cells by ROS-mediated mechanisms: a radical therapeutic approach?
Trachootham, D., Alexandre, J., & Huang, P. (2009) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd2803 · Cited by 5,452
How Matrix Metalloproteinases Regulate Cell Behavior
Sternlicht, M. D., & Werb, Z. (2001) · Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.cellbio.17.1.463 · Cited by 3,959
ROS as signalling molecules: Mechanisms that generate specificity in ROS homeostasis
D'Autréaux, B., & Toledano, M. B. (2007) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm2256 · Cited by 3,642
Crosstalk of reactive oxygen species and NF-κB signaling
Morgan, M. J., & Liu, Z.-G. (2011) · Cell Research · doi:10.1038/cr.2010.178 · Cited by 3,505
NOX enzymes and the biology of reactive oxygen
Lambeth, J. D. (2004) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/nri1312 · Cited by 3,125
Cited by
Cisplatin in cancer therapy: Molecular mechanisms of action
Dasari, S., & Bernard Tchounwou, P. (2014) · European Journal of Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.ejphar.2014.07.025 · Cited by 5,537
Wallace, D. C. (2012) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc3365 · Cited by 2,404
ROS and the DNA damage response in cancer
Srinivas, U. S., Tan, B. W. Q., Vellayappan, B. A., & Jeyasekharan, A. D. (2019) · Redox Biology · doi:10.1016/j.redox.2018.101084 · Cited by 2,144
Reactive oxygen species generating systems meeting challenges of photodynamic cancer therapy
Zhou, Z., Song, J., Nie, L., & Chen, X. (2016) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c6cs00271d · Cited by 2,098
Tebay, L. E., Robertson, H., Durant, S. T., Vitale, S. R., Penning, T. M., Dinkova-Kostova, A. T., & Hayes, J. D. (2015) · Free Radical Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2015.06.021 · Cited by 837
Metadata
- Authors
- Gupta, S. C., Hevia, D., Patchva, S., Park, B., Koh, W., & Aggarwal, B. B.
- Venue
- Antioxidants & Redox Signaling
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2012-06
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1295-1322
- ISSN
- 1523-0864 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7716
- OpenAlex
- W1997238548
- Cited by
- 732
- References
- 30
- FWCI
- 13.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Upsides and Downsides of Reactive Oxygen Species for Cancer: The Roles of Reactive Oxygen Species in Tumorigenesis, Prevention, and Therapy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1089/ars.2011.4414
- The paper
- Gupta, S. C., Hevia, D., Patchva, S., Park, B., Koh, W., & Aggarwal, B. B. (2012). Upsides and Downsides of Reactive Oxygen Species for Cancer: The Roles of Reactive Oxygen Species in Tumorigenesis, Prevention, and Therapy. Antioxidants & Redox Signaling. https://doi.org/10.1089/ars.2011.4414
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.