The DOI matches its Crossref record; 88 of the 88 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ionizing Radiation-Induced DNA Damage, Response, and Repair
Abstract
SIGNIFICANCE: Ionizing radiation (IR) is an effective and commonly employed treatment in the management of more than half of human malignancies. Because IR's ability to control tumors mainly relies on DNA damage, the cell's DNA damage response and repair (DRR) processes may hold the key to determining tumor responses. IR-induced DNA damage activates a number of DRR signaling cascades that control cell cycle arrest, DNA repair, and the cell's fate. DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) generated by IR are the most lethal form of damage, and are mainly repaired via either homologous recombination (HR) or nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ) pathways. RECENT ADVANCES: In recent years, immense effort to understand and exploit the differences in the use of these repair pathways between tumors and normal cells will allow for an increase in tumor cell killing and a decrease in normal tissue injury. CRITICAL ISSUES: Regulation of the two major DSB repair mechanisms (HR and NHEJ) and new strategies, which may improve the therapeutic ratio of radiation by differentially targeting HR and NHEJ function in tumor and normal tissues, is of intense interest currently, and is the focus of this article. FUTURE DIRECTIONS: By utilizing the strategies outlined above, it may be possible to exploit differences between tumor and somatic cell DRR pathways, specifically their DSB repair mechanisms, to improve the therapeutic ratio of IR.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Targeting the DNA repair defect in BRCA mutant cells as a therapeutic strategy
Farmer, H., McCabe, N., Lord, C. J., Tutt, A. N. J., Johnson, D. A., Richardson, T. B., Santarosa, M., Dillon, K. J., Hickson, I., Knights, C., et al. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03445 · Cited by 6,683
Specific killing of BRCA2-deficient tumours with inhibitors of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase
Bryant, H. E., Schultz, N., Thomas, H. D., Parker, K. M., Flower, D., Lopez, E., Kyle, S., Meuth, M., Curtin, N. J., & Helleday, T. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03443 · Cited by 5,198
Inhibition of Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerase in Tumors from BRCA Mutation Carriers
Fong, P. C., Boss, D. S., Yap, T. A., Tutt, A., Wu, P., Mergui-Roelvink, M., Mortimer, P., Swaisland, H., Lau, A., O'Connor, M. J., et al. (2009) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0900212 · Cited by 3,634
GSK-3: tricks of the trade for a multi-tasking kinase
Doble, B. W., & Woodgett, J. R. (2003) · Journal of Cell Science · doi:10.1242/jcs.00384 · Cited by 2,084
The cell cycle: a review of regulation, deregulation and therapeutic targets in cancer
Vermeulen, K., Van Bockstaele, D. R., & Berneman, Z. N. (2003) · Cell Proliferation · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2184.2003.00266.x · Cited by 1,773
Delaney, G., Jacob, S., Featherstone, C., & Barton, M. (2005) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.21324 · Cited by 1,727
Chk1 and Chk2 kinases in checkpoint control and cancer
Bartek, J., & Lukas, J. (2003) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/s1535-6108(03)00110-7 · Cited by 1,513
Ward, J. F. (1988) · Progress in Nucleic Acid Research and Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/s0079-6603(08)60611-x · Cited by 1,492
Amé, J., Spenlehauer, C., & de Murcia, G. (2004) · BioEssays · doi:10.1002/bies.20085 · Cited by 1,459
The ATM–Chk2 and ATR–Chk1 Pathways in DNA Damage Signaling and Cancer
(2010) · Advances in Cancer Research · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-380888-2.00003-0 · Cited by 1,276
Cited by
Neutrophil‐Based Drug Delivery Systems
Chu, D., Dong, X., Shi, X., Zhang, C., & Wang, Z. (2018) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201706245 · Cited by 386
Environment, lifestyle, and female infertility
Bala, R., Singh, V., Rajender, S., & Singh, K. (2021) · Reproductive Sciences · doi:10.1007/s43032-020-00279-3 · Cited by 242
Wide range applications of spirulina: from earth to space missions
Fais, G., Manca, A., Bolognesi, F., Borselli, M., Concas, A., Busutti, M., Broggi, G., Sanna, P., Castillo-Aleman, Y. M., Rivero-Jiménez, R. A., et al. (2022) · Marine Drugs · doi:10.3390/md20050299 · Cited by 98
Cortese, F., Klokov, D., Osipov, A., Stefaniak, J., Moskalev, A., Schastnaya, J., Cantor, C., Aliper, A., Mamoshina, P., Ushakov, I., et al. (2018) · Oncotarget · doi:10.18632/oncotarget.24461 · Cited by 83
Deng, S., Vlatkovic, T., Li, M., Zhan, T., Veldwijk, M. R., & Herskind, C. (2022) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers14194874 · Cited by 62
Metadata
- Authors
- Santivasi, W. L., & Xia, F.
- Venue
- Antioxidants & Redox Signaling
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2014-07-10
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 251-259
- ISSN
- 1523-0864 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7716
- OpenAlex
- W1780348968
- Cited by
- 593
- References
- 88
- FWCI
- 4.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ionizing Radiation-Induced DNA Damage, Response, and Repair. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1089/ars.2013.5668
- The paper
- Santivasi, W. L., & Xia, F. (2014). Ionizing Radiation-Induced DNA Damage, Response, and Repair. Antioxidants & Redox Signaling. https://doi.org/10.1089/ars.2013.5668
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
