Cited by 56Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchAttention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderBehavioral and Psychological Studies

Rating of the effectiveness of 26 psychiatric and seizure medications for autism spectrum disorder: Results of a national survey

Open access
Coleman, Devon M., Adams, James B., Anderson, Amy L., Frye, Richard E.·2019·Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to provide an evaluation of the benefits and adverse effects (AEs) of psychiatric and seizure medications commonly used for individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Methods: As part of the National Survey on Treatment Effectiveness for Autism, we report ratings of 26 psychiatric and seizure medications by 505 participants. Each medication was rated with a standardized scale for overall benefits, overall AEs, and specific symptoms affected. The frequency of use and net perceived benefit (overall benefit minus overall AE) are reported. Results: Most medications were rated as having a slightly greater benefit than AE. Six medications (lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine, clonidine, guanfacine, buspirone, and sertraline) had benefit ratings that were more than twice their adverse rating. Conversely, some medications had slightly negative net benefit ratings (worse AEs than benefits on average), including Adderall, Paroxetine, Quetiapine, Olanzapine, and Topiramate. However, there were wide variations in individual ratings of benefit and AEs, suggesting that clinical response to medications was highly variable, so these scores simply represent averages. A ranking of the top medications (those with the highest net perceived benefit) for each of 18 different symptoms is provided, which may provide some clinical guidance as to which medications may be most worth considering for a given symptom. A comparison of the survey results with the results of clinical trials shows generally good agreement in terms of medication benefits with some differences; in some cases the differences are because the clinical trials did not assess all of the symptoms assessed by this survey. Conclusions: It is hoped that physicians and their patients will find the survey results useful in selecting the most promising medications for a given symptom, and also for monitoring for likely benefits and AEs, especially for medications for which few or no studies have been carried out in ASD populations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/cap.2018.0121

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Evidence from case reports and clinical trials indicates guanfacine can be helpful in boosting top-down control to reduce oppositional, self-injurious and repetitive behaviors in children on the autism spectrum, including children with severe cognitive impairment.

    “Evidence from case reports and clinical trials indicate that guanfacine can be helpful in boosting top down control to reduce oppositional, self-injurious and repetitive behaviors in children on the autism spectrum, including children with severe (e.g. nonverbal) cognitive impairment”

    From Guanfacine’s mechanism of action in treating prefrontal cortical disorders: Successful translation across species (2020) · cites this paper as Coleman et al., 2019

    The Results sections on psychiatric medications and top medications for different symptoms (page not specified) report survey-rated improvements with guanfacine in attention, cognition, hyperactivity, and aggression/agitation, and mention trial evidence for hyperactivity and inattention. They do not establish a top-down-control mechanism or benefit for oppositional, self-injurious, or repetitive behaviors specifically, including in children with severe cognitive impairment; the paper says self-injury and stimming/perseveration were not significantly affected by the medications surveyed overall. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Coleman, D. M., Adams, J. B., Anderson, A. L., & Frye, R. E.
Affiliations
  • Arizona State University (US)
  • Barrow Neurological Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Adams, James B.
Venue
Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology
Published
2019-03
Volume
29
Issue
2
Pages
107-123
ISSN
  • 1044-5463 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-8992
OpenAlex
W2912990928
Cited by
56
References
31
Citations by year
2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3
FWCI
4.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Autism Speaks
  • Organization for Autism Research
  • Northwestern University
  • Autism Research Institute
  • Zynerba Pharmaceuticals
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, psychiatric medication, antiepileptic drugs, seizure medications, perceived treatment effectiveness, adverse effects, lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine, clonidine, guanfacine, buspirone, sertraline, topiramate, olanzapine, quetiapine, paroxetine, Adderall
MeSH terms
Autism Spectrum Disorder, Adolescent, Adult, Anticonvulsants, Child, Female, Humans, Male, Psychotropic Drugs, Surveys and Questionnaires, Treatment Outcome, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review