Cited by 360Obesity, Physical Activity, DietObesity and Health PracticesNutrition, Health and Food Behavior

Urban-rural differences in childhood and adolescent obesity in the United States: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Johnson, James Allen, Johnson, Asal Mohamadi·2015·Childhood Obesity

Abstract

Background: A systematic literature review and subsequent meta-analysis were performed to investigate differences in childhood obesity between urban and rural areas in the United States. Methods: A search of published studies comparing childhood obesity in urban and rural settings was undertaken by probing PubMed and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) for articles that met predetermined inclusion criteria. A subsequent meta-analysis was conducted to determine the combined effect size and significance of differences in childhood obesity between urban and rural areas. Results: Ten studies were identified for systematic review, five of which contributed to the meta-analysis. All but one study suggested that residence in rural areas was associated with higher prevalence or increased odds of childhood obesity, compared to children living in urban areas. A meta-analysis of 74,168 pooled participants ages 2–19 found that rural children have 26% greater odds of obesity, compared to urban children (odds ratio=1.26; 95% confidence interval, 1.21–1.32). Conclusions: Obesity rates are higher among rural children than urban children in the United States. To ensure successful targeted interventions and effective resource allocation, practitioners and policy makers alike should be cognizant of this disparity in childhood obesity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/chi.2014.0085

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Johnson, J. A., & Johnson, A. M.
Affiliations
  • Rollins College (US)
  • Stetson University (US)
Venue
Childhood Obesity
Published
2015-04-30
Volume
11
Issue
3
Pages
233-241
ISSN
  • 2153-2168 (ISSN-L)
  • 2153-2176
OpenAlex
W1948287158
Cited by
360
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 3
FWCI
3.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Childhood Obesity (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Obesity and Health Practices
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
Keywords
adolescent obesity, urban-rural disparities, rural children, obesity prevalence, health disparities, rural health
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Diet, Humans, Nutrition Surveys, Risk Factors, Rural Population, Socioeconomic Factors, United States, Urban Population, Exercise, Body Mass Index, Prevalence, Odds Ratio, Pediatric Obesity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review