Cited by 360Obesity, Physical Activity, DietObesity and Health PracticesNutrition, Health and Food Behavior

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Urban-rural differences in childhood and adolescent obesity in the United States: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Abstract

Background: A systematic literature review and subsequent meta-analysis were performed to investigate differences in childhood obesity between urban and rural areas in the United States. Methods: A search of published studies comparing childhood obesity in urban and rural settings was undertaken by probing PubMed and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) for articles that met predetermined inclusion criteria. A subsequent meta-analysis was conducted to determine the combined effect size and significance of differences in childhood obesity between urban and rural areas. Results: Ten studies were identified for systematic review, five of which contributed to the meta-analysis. All but one study suggested that residence in rural areas was associated with higher prevalence or increased odds of childhood obesity, compared to children living in urban areas. A meta-analysis of 74,168 pooled participants ages 2–19 found that rural children have 26% greater odds of obesity, compared to urban children (odds ratio=1.26; 95% confidence interval, 1.21–1.32). Conclusions: Obesity rates are higher among rural children than urban children in the United States. To ensure successful targeted interventions and effective resource allocation, practitioners and policy makers alike should be cognizant of this disparity in childhood obesity.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/chi.2014.0085

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 33 references

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. National Center for Health Statistics. Health, United States 2006: With chartbook on trends in the health of Americans. 2007 Nov; DHHS Pub No. 2006-1232:1–543.
  2. Gauthier BM, , Hickner JM, , Noel MM. High prevalence of overweight children in Michigan primary care practices: An UPRNet study. J Fam Pract, 2000; 49:73–76.
  3. Neal WA, , Demerath E, , Gonzales E, et al. Coronary artery risk detection in Appalachian communities (CARDIAC): Preliminary findings. W V Med J, 2000; 97:102–105.
  4. Kuczmarski RJ, , Ogden CL, , Guo SS, et al. 2000 CDC growth charts for the United States: Methods and development. Vital Health Stat, 11 2002; 246:1–190.
  5. Office of Management and Budget. Final report and recommendations from the metropolitan area standards review committee to the office of management and budget concerning changes to the standards for defining metropolitan areas. Federal Register, 2000; 65:51059–51077.
  6. Office of Management and Budget. Standards for delineating metropolitan and micropolitan statistical areas. Federal Register, 2010; 75:37246–37252.
  7. Bureau of the Census. Geographic Areas Reference Manual. US Department of Commerce: Washington, DC, 1994.
  8. Ingram DD, , Franco S. NCHS urban-rural classification scheme for counties. Vital Health Stat, 2 2012; 154:1–65.
  9. 10.1089/chi.2011.0090 · DOI
  10. Blumberg SJ, , Olson L, , Frankel MR, et al. Design and operation of the National Survey of Children's Health, 2003. Vital Health Stat, 1 2005; 43:1–131.
  11. Zipf G, , Chiappa M, , Porter KS, et al. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey: Plan and operations, 1999–2010. Vital Health Stat, 1 2013; 56:1–37.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Johnson, J. A., & Johnson, A. M.
Affiliations
  • Rollins College (US)
  • Stetson University (US)
Venue
Childhood Obesity
Published
2015-04-30
Volume
11
Issue
3
Pages
233-241
ISSN
  • 2153-2168 (ISSN-L)
  • 2153-2176
OpenAlex
W1948287158
Cited by
360
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 3
FWCI
3.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Childhood Obesity (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity and Health Practices
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
Keywords
adolescent obesity, urban-rural disparities, rural children, obesity prevalence, health disparities, rural health
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Diet, Humans, Nutrition Surveys, Risk Factors, Rural Population, Socioeconomic Factors, United States, Urban Population, Exercise, Body Mass Index, Prevalence, Odds Ratio, Pediatric Obesity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review