CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 120Sexuality, Behavior, and TechnologyAdolescent Sexual and Reproductive HealthImpact of Technology on Adolescents

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Influence of Descriptive and Injunctive Peer Norms on Adolescents' Risky Sexual Online Behavior

Baumgartner, Susanne E., Valkenburg, Patti M., Peter, Jochen·2011·Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking
DOI 10.1089/cyber.2010.0510
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of descriptive and injunctive peer norms on the engagement in risky sexual online behavior. A four-wave longitudinal study among a representative sample of 1,016 Dutch adolescents (12-17 years old) was conducted. Two autoregressive cross-lagged structural equation models were analyzed to investigate the relationship between perceptions of peer norms and risky sexual online behavior. The findings of this study indicate that both, descriptive and injunctive peer norms, predicted adolescents' engagement in risky sexual online behavior. The effect of descriptive peer norms was stronger and more consistent over the four waves. As expected, perceptions of peer norms were predictors, but not consequences, of risky sexual online behavior. The findings suggest that problematic behaviors on the Internet are influenced by perceptions of what peers do, or approve of, in ways similar to offline risk behaviors.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/cyber.2010.0510

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 34 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1996.tb03175.x · DOI
  2. Berkowitz AD, 2005, Changing the culture of college drinking a socially situated health communication campaign, 193
  3. 10.1093/ct/13.2.184 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–118 of 118

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Baumgartner, S. E., Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J.
Affiliations
University of Amsterdam (NL)
ORCID
Venue
Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2011-12
Volume
14
Issue
12
Pages
753-758
ISSN
  • 2152-2715 (ISSN-L)
  • 2152-2723
DOI
10.1089/cyber.2010.0510
OpenAlex
W2130269821
Cited by
120
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
5.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.liebertpub.com/nv/resources-tools/text-and-data-mining-policy/121/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
Keywords
sexual risk behavior, adolescents, online sexual behavior, peer influence, social norms
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Peer Group, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk-Taking, Sexual Behavior, Social Behavior, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review