Cited by 1,224Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesMedia Influence and HealthBehavioral Health and Interventions

Descriptive and injunctive norms in college drinking: a meta-analytic integration.

Open access
Borsari, Brian, Carey, Kate B·2003·Journal of Studies on Alcohol

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Many college students overestimate both the drinking behaviors (descriptive norms) and the approval of drinking (injunctive norms) of their peers. As a result, consistent self-other discrepancies (SODs) have been observed, in which self-perceptions of drinking behaviors and approval of drinking usually are lower than comparable judgments of others. These SODs form the foundation of the currently popular "social norms approach" to alcohol abuse prevention, which conveys to students the actual campus norms regarding drinking behaviors and approval of alcohol use. However, little attention has been paid to the factors that can influence the magnitude of SODs. This research was conducted to address these issues. METHOD: This meta-analytic integration of 23 studies evaluated the influence of five predictors of SODs: norm type (injunctive or descriptive), gender, reference group, question specificity and campus size. These studies rendered 102 separate tests of SODs in descriptive and injunctive forms, representing the responses of 53,825 participants. RESULTS: All five predictors were significantly related to self-other differences in the perception of norms. Greater SODs were evident for injunctive norms, estimates by women, distal reference groups and nonspecific questions, as well as on smaller campuses. CONCLUSIONS: More systematic attention should be given to how norms are assessed. In particular, SODs can be maximized or minimized, depending on the specificity of the behaviors/attitudes evaluated and the reference groups chosen for comparison.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.15288/jsa.2003.64.331

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The majority of individuals overestimate the prevalence of many undesirable behaviors, such as alcohol use among peers.

    “The majority of individuals overestimate the prevalence of many undesirable behaviors, such as alcohol use among peers (e.g., Borsari & Carey, 2003;Prentice & Miller, 1993)”

    From The Constructive, Destructive, and Reconstructive Power of Social Norms (2007) · cites this paper as Borsari & Carey, 2003

  • Subjects frequently form perceptions of descriptive norms by inferring them from observing others, their comments, and the media, not only from direct summary information.

    “Indeed, or other research found that subjects frequently form perceptions of descriptive norms by inferring these norms (often incorrectly) from simply observing others, their comments, and the media (for example, advertisements suggesting pervasiveness of smoking, or drinking; Borsari and Carey [2003]; Nan and Zhao [2016]; Liu and Shi [2019]).”

    From Science Communication and the Problematic Impact of Descriptive Norms (2023) · cites this paper as Borsari and Carey [2003]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Borsari, B., & Carey, K. B.
Affiliations
Syracuse University (US)
Venue
Journal of Studies on Alcohol
Published
2003-05
Volume
64
Issue
3
Pages
331-341
ISSN
  • 0096-882X (ISSN-L)
  • 1934-2683
OpenAlex
W2130474878
Cited by
1,224
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 57 · 2021: 75 · 2020: 107 · 2019: 56 · 2018: 70 · 2017: 74 · 2016: 85 · 2015: 75 · 2014: 73 · 2013: 84 · 2012: 54
FWCI
9.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Studies on Alcohol (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (F31AA005571, R01AA12518, F31 AA 05571, R01AA012518)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Media Influence and Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
Keywords
college drinking, social norms, descriptive norms, injunctive norms, self-other discrepancy, alcoholism prevention, peer perception, gender differences, reference groups, alcohol consumption
MeSH terms
Alcohol Drinking, Female, Humans, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sex Factors, Students, Universities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review