Cited by 32Pain Management and TreatmentVirtual Reality Applications and ImpactsStroke Rehabilitation and Recovery

Application of Virtual Body Swapping to Patients with Complex Regional Pain Syndrome: A Pilot Study

Jeon, Bomyi, Cho, Sungkun, Lee, Jang-Han·2014·Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking

Abstract

This study aimed to apply virtual body swapping through mental rehearsal for patients with complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) and to investigate whether it is applicable to them. Ten patients who met the diagnostic criterion for CRPS type 1 were randomly assigned to either the treatment or control group. All participants were asked to watch the virtual body swapping training video clip with a head mounted display. The treatment group was additionally asked to assume a posture similar to the body on the screen and rehearse the movements mentally, as if the body presented on the screen was their body. No difference between the groups was found for pain intensity, however, the treatment group showed significantly more improvement in body perception disturbance (BPD) after the treatment than the control group. Even if the presented study is a preliminary one, the above results suggest that virtual body swapping through mental rehearsal is applicable for patients with CRPS and may be useful for improving BPD. The limitations of the study and the future investigations needed to provide clearer clinical suggestions are presented and discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/cyber.2014.0046

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a recent study of CRPS type 1 patients, the treatment group that watched a video clip presenting virtual body swapping and mentally rehearsed movements showed improvement in body perception while the control group did not, despite no group difference in pain levels.

    “The treatment group showed improvement in body perception while the control group did not, despite no group difference in pain levels.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 40 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jeon, B., Cho, S., & Lee, J.-H.
Affiliations
  • Chung-Ang University (KR)
  • Chungnam National University (KR)
Corresponding author
  • Cho, Sungkun
  • Lee, Jang-Han
Venue
Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking
Published
2014-06
Volume
17
Issue
6
Pages
366-370
ISSN
  • 2152-2715 (ISSN-L)
  • 2152-2723
OpenAlex
W2100062056
Cited by
32
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2
FWCI
1.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
Keywords
complex regional pain syndrome, mental imagery, virtual reality, pain intensity
MeSH terms
Adult, Analysis of Variance, Female, Humans, Male, Pain Measurement, Pilot Projects, Complex Regional Pain Syndromes, Republic of Korea, Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review