CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 87

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Psychological Benefits of Being Authentic on Facebook

Grieve, Rachel, Watkinson, Jarrah·2016·Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking
DOI 10.1089/cyber.2016.0010
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Having others acknowledge and validate one's true self is associated with better psychological health. Existing research indicates that an individual's true self may be more readily expressed on Facebook than in person. This study brought together these two premises by investigating for the first time the psychosocial outcomes associated with communicating one's true self on Facebook. Participants ( n = 164) completed a personality assessment once as their true self and once as the self they present on Facebook (Facebook self), as well as measures of social connectedness, subjective well-being, depression, anxiety, and stress. Euclidean distances quantified the difference between one's true self and the Facebook self. Hypotheses received partial support. Better coherence between the true self and the Facebook self was associated with better social connectedness and less stress. Two models provided evidence of mediation effects. Findings highlight that authentic self-presentation on Facebook can be associated with positive psychological outcomes.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/cyber.2016.0010

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. McKenna KYA. (2007) Through the Internet looking glass: expressing and validating the true self. In Johnson A, , McKenna KYA, , Postmes T, ,. Reips UD, eds. The Oxford handbook of Internet psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 205–221.
  2. 10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.052 · DOI
  3. Rogers C. (1951) Client-centered therapy. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
  4. Baumeister RF. (1998. The self. In Gilbert DT, , Fiske ST, , Lindzey G, eds. Handbook of social psychology. 4th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, pp. 680–740.
  5. Goldman BM, , Kernis MH. The role of authenticity in healthy psychological functioning and subjective well-being. Annals of the American Psychotherapy Association, 2002; 5:18–20.
  6. 10.1037/0022-3514.73.6.1380 · DOI
  7. 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1989.tb02384.x · DOI
  8. 10.1016/j.chb.2008.02.012 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1111/jcc4.12103 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/j.chb.2013.07.030 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1080/00223890902935878 · DOI
  12. 10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Lovibond SH, , Lovibond PF. (1995) Manual for the depression anxiety stress scales. 2nd ed. Sydney, Australia: Psychology Foundation.
  14. 10.1016/j.paid.2005.11.018 · DOI
  15. 10.3109/00048674.2010.529604 · DOI
  16. 10.1111/j.1758-0854.2010.01045.x · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.3109/01612840.2011.632708 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1207/s15327906mbr3001_3 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/j.paid.2011.11.007 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1027/1864-1105.20.3.106 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/j.chb.2015.04.034 · DOI
  22. Beck AT. (1967) Depression: clinical experimental and theoretical aspects. New York: Harper and Row.
  23. 10.1037/0021-843X.116.2.313 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 87

Metadata

Authors
Grieve, R., & Watkinson, J.
Affiliations
University of Tasmania
Venue
Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2016-07-01
Volume
19
Issue
7
Pages
420-425
ISSN
  • 2152-2715
  • 2152-2723
DOI
10.1089/cyber.2016.0010
Cited by
87
References
8
Language
en
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review