Cited by 108Impact of Technology on AdolescentsCOVID-19 and Mental HealthChild Development and Digital Technology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 6 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Internet-Related Behaviors and Psychological Distress Among Schoolchildren During the COVID-19 School Hiatus

Open access
Chen, Chao-Ying, Chen, I-Hua, Pakpour, Amir H., Lin, Chung-Ying, Griffiths, Mark D.·2021·Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking

Abstract

= 2,026; mean [standard deviation] age = 10.71 years [1.07]; 1,011 [49.9 percent] girls) in Sichuan, China completed a cross-sectional online survey, and this study was approved by the ethics committee of the Hong Kong Polytechnic University (IRB ref: HSEARS20190718001). The Internet Gaming Disorder Scale-Short Form, Bergen Social Media Addiction Scale, and Smartphone Application-Based Addiction Scale were used to assess problematic gaming, social media use, and smartphone use. The Depression, Anxiety, Stress Scale-21 was used to assess distress, and an item rated on a 0-10 scale was included to assess fear of being infected by COVID-19. Fear of being infected by COVID-19 was assessed because this could be a confounding variable in the association between psychological distress and screen time use. Increased time spent on gaming, social media, and smartphones was associated with greater problematic gaming, problematic social media use, problematic smartphone use, and psychological distress, but was not associated with fear of COVID-19 infection. Mediation analyses showed that problematic gaming, problematic social media use, and problematic smartphone use were significant mediators in the association between psychological distress and increased time spent on Internet-related activities during the COVID-19 outbreak period. Children who had psychological distress during COVID-19 outbreak might have spent longer time on Internet-related activities due to the school hiatus and problematic use of Internet-related activities. Parents/caregivers are recommended to monitor their children's use of Internet while encouraging children to engage in positive activities to ease the concern of negative psychological responses during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/cyber.2020.0497

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

23 Own result · 12 Own method · 9 Own interpretation · 5 Not checked yet · 1 No basis given

Verify all 6 references — free account

Show all 30 claims

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 12
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 8
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
20 of 20
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Participants answered the COVID-19 questions based on the moment they completed the survey.

    “No time frame was provided in relation to the COVID-19 questions because it was assumed that participants would answer these based on the moment that they completed the survey.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The single 0-10 item adequately measures fear of being infected by COVID-19.

    “an item rated on a 0-10 scale was included to assess fear of being infected by COVID-19.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The reported increases in time spent on activities are attributable to COVID-19.

    “The COVID-19related items (answered yes/no) were (i)”
3 of 3

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

1 of 1

Citations

Cites

Show all 43 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Csibi S, 2016, Psychiatria Hungarica, 31, 71

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Chen, C.-Y., Chen, I.-H., Pakpour, A. H., Lin, C.-Y., & Griffiths, M. D.
Affiliations
  • Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK)
  • Krirk University (TH)
  • Qazvin University of Medical Sciences (IR)
  • Nottingham Trent University (GB)
Venue
Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking
Published
2021-10-01
Volume
24
Issue
10
Pages
654-663
ISSN
  • 2152-2715 (ISSN-L)
  • 2152-2723
OpenAlex
W3155259296
Cited by
105
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 18
FWCI
28.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Nottingham Trent University's Institutional Repository (Nottingham Trent Repository) (acceptedVersion)
  • qums (Qazvin University of Medical Sciences) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
Keywords
psychological distress, elementary school students, gaming addiction, social media addiction, smartphone addiction, screen time, depression, anxiety, stress, fear of COVID-19 infection, mediation, children's internet use
MeSH terms
Psychological Distress, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Child, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Universities, Pandemics, Social Media

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-05, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-05 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review