The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 6 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
Internet-Related Behaviors and Psychological Distress Among Schoolchildren During the COVID-19 School Hiatus
Open accessAbstract
= 2,026; mean [standard deviation] age = 10.71 years [1.07]; 1,011 [49.9 percent] girls) in Sichuan, China completed a cross-sectional online survey, and this study was approved by the ethics committee of the Hong Kong Polytechnic University (IRB ref: HSEARS20190718001). The Internet Gaming Disorder Scale-Short Form, Bergen Social Media Addiction Scale, and Smartphone Application-Based Addiction Scale were used to assess problematic gaming, social media use, and smartphone use. The Depression, Anxiety, Stress Scale-21 was used to assess distress, and an item rated on a 0-10 scale was included to assess fear of being infected by COVID-19. Fear of being infected by COVID-19 was assessed because this could be a confounding variable in the association between psychological distress and screen time use. Increased time spent on gaming, social media, and smartphones was associated with greater problematic gaming, problematic social media use, problematic smartphone use, and psychological distress, but was not associated with fear of COVID-19 infection. Mediation analyses showed that problematic gaming, problematic social media use, and problematic smartphone use were significant mediators in the association between psychological distress and increased time spent on Internet-related activities during the COVID-19 outbreak period. Children who had psychological distress during COVID-19 outbreak might have spent longer time on Internet-related activities due to the school hiatus and problematic use of Internet-related activities. Parents/caregivers are recommended to monitor their children's use of Internet while encouraging children to engage in positive activities to ease the concern of negative psychological responses during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
23 Own result · 12 Own method · 9 Own interpretation · 5 Not checked yet · 1 No basis given
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“During the school hiatus period, 23.7% of the participants increased their time spent in gaming; 38.9% increased time spent using social media; 49.9% increased time spent using smartphones; 49.0% increased time spent watching television; 53.9% increased time spent exercising; and 69.8% increased time spent reading/studying.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“During the school hiatus period, 23.7% of the participants increased their time spent in gaming; 38.9% increased time spent using social media; 49.9% increased time spent using smartphones; 49.0% increased time spent watching television; 53.9% increased time spent exercising; and 69.8% increased time spent reading/studying.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“During the school hiatus period, 23.7% of the participants increased their time spent in gaming; 38.9% increased time spent using social media; 49.9% increased time spent using smartphones; 49.0% increased time spent watching television; 53.9% increased time spent exercising; and 69.8% increased time spent reading/studying.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“During the school hiatus period, 23.7% of the participants increased their time spent in gaming; 38.9% increased time spent using social media; 49.9% increased time spent using smartphones; 49.0% increased time spent watching television; 53.9% increased time spent exercising; and 69.8% increased time spent reading/studying.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The first three mediation analyses (Figure 1) showed that problematic gaming was a significant mediator in the association between psychological distress (depression, anxiety, and stress) and increased gaming time during the school hiatus.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Moreover, the children reported that their fear of COVID-19 infection was less than 5 (out of 10).”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, 45% of participants who spent increased time on studying reported less time spent on smartphones.”
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This appears to be true for gaming and social media use because the present study's results indicated that 75% of participants who spent increased time on studying reported less time spent gaming, and 58% of participants who spent increased time on studying reported less time spent on social media.”
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Increased time spent on gaming, social media, and smartphones was associated with greater problematic gaming, problematic social media use, problematic smartphone use, and psychological distress but was not associated with fear of COVID-19 infection.”
plaincorrelationaln = 2,026- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The final three mediation analyses (Figure 3) showed that problematic smartphone use was a significant mediator in the association between psychological distress (depression, anxiety, and stress) and increased smartphone use time during the school hiatus.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- It may state two separate claims as one. 12
- Probably not a substantial claim. 8
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Students (n=2026; mean [SD] age=10.71years [1.07]; 1011 [49.9%] girls) in Sichuan, China completed a cross-sectional online survey.”
plainn = 2,026- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Increased time spent on gaming, social media, and smartphones was associated with greater problematic gaming, problematic social media use, problematic smartphone use, and psychological distress but was not associated with fear of COVID-19 infection.”
plaincorrelationaln = 2,026- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In contrast, children who increased their time reading/studying or exercising showed less problematic use of internet-related activities and less psychological distress during school hiatus.”
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In contrast, children who increased their time reading/studying or exercising showed less problematic use of internet-related activities and less psychological distress during school hiatus.”
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Fear of COVID-19 infection was weakly and significantly correlated with IGDS-SF9 (r=0.096),BSMAS (r=0.058),depression (r=0.137),anxiety (r=0.117),stress (r=0.124), and not significantly correlated to SABAS (r=0.043;Table 3).”
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Fear of COVID-19 infection was weakly and significantly correlated with IGDS-SF9 (r=0.096),BSMAS (r=0.058),depression (r=0.137),anxiety (r=0.117),stress (r=0.124), and not significantly correlated to SABAS (r=0.043;Table 3).”
plain- Asserted: fails — The authors may not put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. The quote only partly states this claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The internal consistency of the Chinese DASS-21 in the present study was good (α=0.820for depression subscale; 0.778 for anxiety subscale; and 0.813 for stress subscale).”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Therefore, the mediation effects were only partial and the mediators might not substantially impact the direct effect between psychological distress and screen time.”
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Some increased usage may be due to the need for online learning and getting social support on top of staying home for long periods of time.”
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Without the information, the present study cannot conclude whether the present participants did not concern COVID-19 because of lacking related experience.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Second, the present study was cross-sectional without longitudinal follow-up to confirm possible cause-and-effect relationships.”
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“First, participants in this study were recruited from a single province in China, and therefore the findings may not be fully generalized to other provinces countries undergoing the same public health crisis.”
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, these negative impacts were associated with increased time on gaming and the use of social media and smartphone (rather than the fear of COVID-19) which may lead to problematic use of these internet-related activities.45”
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, the participants in the present sample were significantly older than the entire population in the three schools (t=29.87 and p<.001) 4 .”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Given that the large sample size in the present study might make t-tests with a negligible difference significant, effect sizes (ESs) using Cohen's d were calculated to capture the difference magnitude: 0.2 indicates small; 0.5 is moderate; and 0.8 is large 40 ).”
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Furthermore, children may have sense of achievement when they complete schoolwork or exercise, and this sense of achievement may subsequently elevate their satisfaction, resulting in positive psychological effects 42,43 .”
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“All nine models shared the same controlled variables of age, gender, and fear of COVID-19 infection.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Finally, the present study did not ask information regarding whether schoolchildren's family members or friends were at risk of death from COVID-19.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Third, the outcome measures were based on children's self-report.Although the scales used have very good psychometric properties, 8,21,26- 39 the lack of objective measures (i.e., objective indices of time spent on internet-related behaviors and objective/structured diagnoses of depression and anxiety) is still a potential limitation of this study.”
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“More importantly, this finding may reflect that the supervision and support from parents/caregivers was not sufficient when children are experiencing school habitus and suggests the need for better coping strategies in such situations.”
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
The authors state this as an assumption.
Participants answered the COVID-19 questions based on the moment they completed the survey.
“No time frame was provided in relation to the COVID-19 questions because it was assumed that participants would answer these based on the moment that they completed the survey.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The single 0-10 item adequately measures fear of being infected by COVID-19.
“an item rated on a 0-10 scale was included to assess fear of being infected by COVID-19.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The reported increases in time spent on activities are attributable to COVID-19.
“The COVID-19related items (answered yes/no) were (i)”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In general, studies reported that social media use increased during the Covid-19 pandemic (36, 47, 56, 60, 62), including the usage of a variety of social media platforms (e.g., Instagram, Snapchat, TikTok).”
From Digital Media Use and Adolescents' Mental Health During the Covid-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2022) · cites this paper as [62]
In the citing paper
“In addition, young people showed less increment in Internet-related activities and lower psychological distress when involved in structured activities (37) or spent more time reading, studying or exercising (62).”
From Digital Media Use and Adolescents' Mental Health During the Covid-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2022) · cites this paper as [62]
In the citing paper
“That would end up in the experience of negative emotions due to the loss of control over online activities and the search for more frequent gratifications online (62).”
From Digital Media Use and Adolescents' Mental Health During the Covid-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2022) · cites this paper as [62]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ Discussion
“the fear of being infected by COVID-19 did not impact on any noticeable changes concerning increased time or problematic gaming, problematic social media use and problematic smartphone use given the weak significant correlations with small effect sizes (i.e., between 0.117 and 0.137).”
§ Results
“Fear of COVID-19 infection was weakly and significantly correlated with IGDS-SF9 (r=0.096),BSMAS (r=0.058),depression (r=0.137),anxiety (r=0.117),stress (r=0.124), and not significantly correlated to SABAS (r=0.043;Table 3).”
Citations
Cites
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
American Psychiatric Association (2013) · doi:10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596 · Cited by 116,369
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
Muller, K. E., & Cohen, J. (1989) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1270020 · Cited by 99,603
(2013) · Cited by 44,563
The Psychological Impact of Quarantine and How to Reduce It: Rapid Review of the Evidence
Brooks, S. K., Webster, R. K., Smith, L. E., Woodland, L., Wessely, S., Greenberg, N., & Rubin, G. J. (2020) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3532534 · Cited by 16,394
The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: Rapid review of the evidence
Brooks, S. K., Webster, R. K., Smith, L. E., Woodland, L., Wessely, S., Greenberg, N., & Rubin, G. J. (2020) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30460-8 · Cited by 16,378
Wang, C., Pan, R., Wan, X., Tan, Y., Xu, L., Ho, C. S., & Ho, R. C. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph17051729 · Cited by 9,923
Antony, M. M., Bieling, P. J., Cox, B. J., Enns, M. W., & Swinson, R. P. (1998) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/1040-3590.10.2.176 · Cited by 4,874
The Fear of COVID-19 Scale: Development and Initial Validation
Ahorsu, D. K., Lin, C.-Y., Imani, V., Saffari, M., Griffiths, M. D., & Pakpour, A. H. (2022) · International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction · doi:10.1007/s11469-020-00270-8 · Cited by 4,332
Self-citationA “components” model of addiction within a biopsychosocial framework
Griffiths, M. (2005) · Journal of Substance Use · doi:10.1080/14659890500114359 · Cited by 3,088
Self-citationWang, C., Pan, R., Wan, X., Tan, Y., Xu, L., McIntyre, R. S., Choo, F. N., Tran, B., Ho, R., Sharma, V. K., et al. (2020) · Brain, Behavior, and Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.bbi.2020.04.028 · Cited by 2,571 · cited 1×
“38,39 The timeframe used in the original DASS-21 (i.e., asking about psychological distress in the past week) was applied in the present study.”
Brand, M., Wegmann, E., Stark, R., Müller, A., Wölfling, K., Robbins, T. W., & Potenza, M. N. (2019) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.06.032 · Cited by 2,126
Development of a Facebook Addiction Scale
Andreassen, C. S., Torsheim, T., Brunborg, G. S., & Pallesen, S. (2012) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.2466/02.09.18.pr0.110.2.501-517 · Cited by 1,884
Andreassen, C. S., Pallesen, S., & Griffiths, M. D. (2017) · Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.03.006 · Cited by 1,504
Self-citationPsychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on health care workers in Singapore
Tan, B. Y. Q., Chew, N. W. S., Lee, G. K. H., Jing, M., Goh, Y., Yeo, L. L. L., Zhang, K., Chin, H.-K., Ahmad, A., Khan, F. A., et al. (2020) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/m20-1083 · Cited by 1,279
Measuring DSM-5 Internet gaming disorder: Development and validation of a short psychometric scale
Pontes, H. M., & Griffiths, M. D. (2015) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.12.006 · Cited by 1,151
Self-citationLee, S. M., Kang, W. S., Cho, A.-R., Kim, T., & Park, J. K. (2018) · Comprehensive Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.comppsych.2018.10.003 · Cited by 1,112
Internet Addiction - Time to be Taken Seriously?
Griffiths, M. (2000) · Addiction Research · doi:10.3109/16066350009005587 · Cited by 635
Self-citationCross-cultural validation of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale–21 in China.
Wang, K., Shi, H.-S., Geng, F.-L., Zou, L.-Q., Tan, S.-P., Wang, Y., Neumann, D. L., Shum, D. H. K., & Chan, R. C. K. (2016) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/pas0000207 · Cited by 635
Social Reaction Toward the 2019 Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19)
Lin, C. (2020) · Asian Journal of Social Health and Behavior · doi:10.4103/shb.shb_11_20 · Cited by 562
Self-citationInternet addiction and sleep problems: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Alimoradi, Z., Lin, C., Broström, A., Bülow, P. H., Bajalan, Z., Griffiths, M. D., Ohayon, M. M., & Pakpour, A. H. (2019) · Sleep Medicine Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.smrv.2019.06.004 · Cited by 559
Self-citationEconomic Impacts of Wuhan 2019-nCoV on China and the World
Ayittey, F. K., Ayittey, M. K., Chiwero, N. B., Kamasah, J. S., & Dzuvor, C. K. O. (2020) · Journal of Medical Virology · doi:10.1002/jmv.25706 · Cited by 507
Xu, H., Wen, L. M., & Rissel, C. (2015) · Journal of Obesity · doi:10.1155/2015/546925 · Cited by 454
Monacis, L., de Palo, V., Griffiths, M. D., & Sinatra, M. (2017) · Journal of Behavioral Addictions · doi:10.1556/2006.6.2017.023 · Cited by 446
Self-citationLeung, H., Pakpour, A. H., Strong, C., Lin, Y.-C., Tsai, M.-C., Griffiths, M. D., Lin, C.-Y., & Chen, I.-H. (2020) · Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2019.04.027 · Cited by 290
Self-citationLin, C., Broström, A., Griffiths, M. D., & Pakpour, A. H. (2020) · Internet Interventions · doi:10.1016/j.invent.2020.100345 · Cited by 290
Self-citationKaraer, Y., & Akdemir, D. (2019) · Comprehensive Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.comppsych.2019.03.003 · Cited by 288
The Psychometric Properties of the Smartphone Application-Based Addiction Scale (SABAS)
Csibi, S., Griffiths, M. D., Cook, B. J., Demetrovics, Z., & Szabó, A. (2017) · International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction · doi:10.1007/s11469-017-9787-2 · Cited by 268
Self-citationLin, C.-Y., Broström, A., Nilsen, P., Griffiths, M. D., & Pakpour, A. H. (2017) · Journal of Behavioral Addictions · doi:10.1556/2006.6.2017.071 · Cited by 236
Self-citationChen, I.-H., Strong, C., Lin, Y.-C., Tsai, M.-C., Leung, H., Lin, C.-Y., Pakpour, A. H., & Griffiths, M. D. (2020) · Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2019.04.018 · Cited by 229
Self-citationZhang, L., Zhang, D., Fang, J., Wan, Y., Tao, F., & Sun, Y. (2020) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.21482 · Cited by 202 · cited 1×
“13 With the restriction of outdoor activities due to school hiatus, participation in other activities (e.g., exercise, watching tele-vision, smartphone use) may increase or decrease.”
Yam, C.-W., Pakpour, A. H., Griffiths, M. D., Yau, W.-Y., Lo, C.-L. M., Ng, J. M. T., Lin, C., & Leung, H. (2018) · Psychiatric Quarterly · doi:10.1007/s11126-018-9610-7 · Cited by 193
Self-citationChen, I.-H., Chen, C.-Y., Pakpour, A. H., Griffiths, M. D., & Lin, C.-Y. (2020) · Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.jaac.2020.06.007 · Cited by 149
Self-citationShoshani, A., & Slone, M. (2017) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01866 · Cited by 119
YOUNG, K. S., & Brand, M. (2017) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01853 · Cited by 117
Properties of the DASS‐21 in an Australian Community Adolescent Population
Shaw, T., Campbell, M. A., Runions, K., & Zubrick, S. R. (2016) · Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1002/jclp.22376 · Cited by 112
Chen, I., Ahorsu, D. K., Pakpour, A. H., Griffiths, M. D., Lin, C., & Chen, C. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00875 · Cited by 109
Self-citationWu, T., Lin, C., Årestedt, K., Griffiths, M. D., Broström, A., & Pakpour, A. H. (2017) · Journal of Behavioral Addictions · doi:10.1556/2006.6.2017.025 · Cited by 103
Self-citationSmartphone Application-Based Addiction Among Iranian Adolescents: A Psychometric Study
Lin, C., Imani, V., Broström, A., Nilsén, P., Fung, X. C. C., Griffiths, M. D., & Pakpour, A. H. (2018) · International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction · doi:10.1007/s11469-018-0026-2 · Cited by 73
Self-citationOlatunji, O. S., Ayandele, O., Ashirudeen, D., & Olaniru, O. S. (2020) · Asian Journal of Social Health and Behavior · doi:10.4103/shb.shb_43_20 · Cited by 65
Soraci, P., Ferrari, A., Urso, A., & Griffiths, M. D. (2020) · International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction · doi:10.1007/s11469-020-00222-2 · Cited by 49
Self-citationInsufficient Physical Activity and Overweight: Does Caregiver Screen-Viewing Matter?
Lin, Y.-C., Fung, X. C. C., Tsai, M., Strong, C., Hsieh, Y., & Lin, C. (2018) · Journal of Child and Family Studies · doi:10.1007/s10826-018-1247-5 · Cited by 34
Self-citationRelationship Between Problematic Internet Use and Time Management Among Nursing Students
Öksüz, E., Guvenc, G., & Mumcu, Ş. (2018) · CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing · doi:10.1097/cin.0000000000000391 · Cited by 31
Lin, Y.-C., Tsai, M., Strong, C., Hsieh, Y., Lin, C., & Lee, C. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph17061878 · Cited by 11
Self-citationSojević, M., Pećanac, D., & Latas, M. B. (2018) · Medicinski podmladak · doi:10.5937/mp69-17929 · Cited by 10
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Csibi S, 2016, Psychiatria Hungarica, 31, 71
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Marciano, L., Ostroumova, M., Schulz, P. J., & Camerini, A.-L. (2022) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2021.793868 · Cited by 420
Ye, J.-H., Wu, Y.-T., Wu, Y.-F., Chen, M.-Y., & Ye, J.-N. (2022) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2022.847672 · Cited by 221
“(56) found that problematic gaming, problematic social media use, and problematic smartphone use are important mediators of the association between psychological distress and increased time spent on Internet-related activities during the COVID-19 outbreak.”
BackgroundAlimoradi, Z., Ohayon, M. M., Griffiths, M. D., Lin, C., & Pakpour, A. H. (2022) · BJPsych Open · doi:10.1192/bjo.2022.26 · Cited by 194
Self-citationJovanović, G. K., Zubalj, N. D., Majanović, S. K., Rahelić, D., Rahelić, V., Lončar, J. V., & Žeželj, S. P. (2021) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu13113788 · Cited by 170
Problematic Internet use (PIU) in youth: a brief literature review of selected topics
Ruckwongpatr, K., Paratthakonkun, C., Ghavifekr, S., Gan, W. Y., Tung, S. E. H., Nurmala, I., Nadhiroh, S. R., Pramukti, I., & Lin, C. (2022) · Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2022.101150 · Cited by 131
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Chen, C.-Y., Chen, I.-H., Pakpour, A. H., Lin, C.-Y., & Griffiths, M. D.
- Affiliations
- Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK)
- Krirk University (TH)
- Qazvin University of Medical Sciences (IR)
- Nottingham Trent University (GB)
- Venue
- Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2021-10-01
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 654-663
- ISSN
- 2152-2715 (ISSN-L)
- 2152-2723
- OpenAlex
- W3155259296
- Semantic Scholar
- 09c8445bcbf43e38415a7b1edaef4531a3df288a
- Cited by
- 105
- References
- 43
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 18
- FWCI
- 28.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Nottingham Trent University's Institutional Repository (Nottingham Trent Repository) (acceptedVersion)
- qums (Qazvin University of Medical Sciences) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
- Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
- Keywords
- psychological distress, elementary school students, gaming addiction, social media addiction, smartphone addiction, screen time, depression, anxiety, stress, fear of COVID-19 infection, mediation, children's internet use
- MeSH terms
- Psychological Distress, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Child, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Universities, Pandemics, Social Media
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-05, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-05 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
