Effect of Steel and Teflon Infusion Catheters on Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue Blood Flow and Infusion Counter Pressure in Humans
Abstract
Background Subcutaneous tissue is an important target for drug deposition or infusion. A local trauma may induce alterations in local microcirculation and diffusion barriers with consequences for drug bioavailability. We examined the influence of infusion catheters' wear time on local microcirculation and infusion counter pressure. Methods One steel catheter and one Teflon (Dupont, Wilmington, DE) catheter were inserted in subcutaneous, abdominal adipose tissue (SCAAT) in 10 healthy, lean men. The catheters were infused with isotonic saline at a rate of 10 microL/h for 48 h. Another steel catheter and a Teflon catheter were inserted contralateral to the previous catheters after 48 h. The infusion counter pressure was measured during a basal infusion rate followed by a bolus infusion. The measurements during a basal rate infusion were repeated after the bolus infusion. Adipose tissue blood flow (ATBF) was measured in SCAAT continuously. Results A significant increase in ATBF was observed with wear time for Teflon but not for steel catheters. Mean infusion pressure during the bolus phase increased significantly from 0 to 48 h for Teflon but not for steel catheters. ATBF and infusion counter pressure was similar between Teflon and steel catheters after acute catheter implantation and after wear time of 48 h. The maximum value of pressure during the bolus phase increased with wear time of a catheter. Conclusions ATBF and bolus mean infusion pressure increased significantly with a…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Previous studies have shown steel cannulas have better durability of favorable IIS properties and greater resistance to kinking than Teflon.
“Previous studies have shown steel cannulas have better durability of favorable IIS properties and greater resistance to kinking than Teflon.18”
From Frequency and Detection of Insulin Infusion Site Failure in the Type 1 Diabetes Exchange Online Community (2023) · cites this paper as [18]
The acute inflammatory response and the infusion of insulin may directly increase local blood flow, which may contribute to increased insulin uptake on day 5 of catheter wear-time.
“Furthermore, the acute inflammatory response and the infusion of insulin may directly increase local blood flow,33–38 which may contribute to increased insulin uptake on day 5 of catheter wear-time.”
From Detailed Analysis of Insulin Absorption Variability and the Tissue Response to Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion Catheter Implantation in Swine (2017) · cites this paper as [34]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Insulin Infusion Set: The Achilles Heel of Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion
Heinemann, L., & Krinelke, L. (2012) · Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology · doi:10.1177/193229681200600429 · Cited by 148 · see citing works
Schmid, V., Hohberg, C., Borchert, M., Forst, T., & Pfützner, A. (2010) · Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology · doi:10.1177/193229681000400429 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Randomized Trial of Infusion Set Function: Steel Versus Teflon
Patel, P. J., Benasi, K., Ferrari, G., Evans, M. G., Shanmugham, S., Wilson, D. M., & Buckingham, B. A. (2014) · Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1089/dia.2013.0119 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Pfützner, A., Sachsenheimer, D., Grenningloh, M., Heschel, M., Walther-Johannesen, L., Gharabli, R., & Klonoff, D. (2015) · Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology · doi:10.1177/1932296815604438 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Hauzenberger, J. R., Hipszer, B. R., Loeum, C., McCue, P. A., DeStefano, M., Torjman, M. C., Kaner, M. T., Dinesen, A. R., Chervoneva, I., Pieber, T. R., et al. (2017) · Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1089/dia.2017.0175 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Hughes, M. S., Douvas, J. L., Layfield-Bryan, M., Blanco, L. E., Gray, J. C., Zapotoczny, G., Espinoza, J., Wilcox, J. H., & Lal, R. A. (2023) · Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1089/dia.2023.0005 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
- Authors
- Højbjerre, L., Skov-Jensen, C., Kaastrup, P., Pedersen, P. E., & Stallknecht, B.
- Affiliations
- University of Copenhagen (DK)
- Novo Nordisk (Denmark) (DK)
- Corresponding author
- Højbjerre, Lise
- ORCID
- Stallknecht, Bente
- Venue
- Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2009-05
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 301-306
- ISSN
- 1520-9156 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-8593
- OpenAlex
- W2026697237
- Cited by
- 24
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 1.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Novo Nordisk
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Intravenous Infusion Technology and Safety
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Intramuscular injections and effects
- Keywords
- infusion catheter, Teflon catheter, subcutaneous adipose tissue, adipose tissue blood flow, local microcirculation, biocompatibility, bolus infusion, drug delivery
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Blood Flow Velocity, Calibration, Catheterization, Catheterization, Peripheral, Diabetes Mellitus, Equipment Design, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Infusions, Intravenous, Insulin, Polytetrafluoroethylene, Skinfold Thickness, Steel, Body Mass Index, Subcutaneous Fat
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review